Sign In:
Login with Facebook
78276
Type: Album Release date: 15/08/2011
Your Rating:

Ryan Lott (aka Son Lux) is one of a long list of classically-trained musicians who have made the step into a more ‘alternative’ sphere, applying an intimate knowledge of melody, hues and palette to a more beat-driven, rhythmic sound.

We Are Rising is Lott’s second album, following on from his acclaimed, experimental 2009 debut, At War With Walls & Mazes. Apparently not one to rest on his laurels, Lott created his latest in just 28 days as part of National Public Radio’s ‘RPM Challenge’ (an aural equivalent of the increasingly popular National Novel Writing Month).

In a sense, it sounds like it was recorded quickly. Not to suggest it sounds sloppy or amateurish, rather that it is surprisingly sparse. For a man with an apparent obsession with noise (between 2007-10 he compulsively hoarded thousands of sounds — one and two-note fragments, samples and live snippets), his voice, rather than overt aural trickery, forms the centre of most of the tracks here. Similar to labelmate Yoni Wolf of Why?, his voice is unspectacular but emotive.

This is proved right from the off with opening track ‘Flickers’, which - after some tense synth stabs - relaxes into a more meditative tone, driven by gently throbbing bass and twinkling piano. Long stretches are instrumental, with ghostly vocals drifting in the background, but when Lott’s ‘real’ voice returns the backing instrumentation tends to recede, leaving him to float unhindered.

‘Flickers’ sets the tone for much of the album, which is a strange beast. On paper it’s your standard one-man laptop pop, but this is occasionally much more subtle than that tag suggests. Much of the record is underpinned with a delicately creepy, almost gothic vibe. If Batman had access to some early Hot Chip and a copy of Audacity, it might sound a little like this.

‘Leave the Riches’ is a highlight, the refrain “leave the riches, take the bones, I’m ready to be robbed” is repeated throughout, a simple line, but one rich with implications. The off-kilter atmosphere is completed with crunching, fluttering percussion and chilling, high-pitched vocal samples, the latter escalating to create an almost church-like ambience.

The slightly eerie feeling reaches its apex in ‘Claws’, with a backdrop of harsh-sounding, stretched vocal samples, and the mysterious repeated line “you’ve got your claws in me, don’t you” again in Lott’s favoured ambivalent tone of voice.

A problem emerges when the final two tracks abandon the cold atmospherics, opting to finish on a lighter, more triumphant note. This is particularly jarring at the close of ‘Rebuild’, a sunny cacophony of trilling keys and trumpets. These are not bad songs, but in terms of tone they seem very much at odds with the rest of the album, perhaps evidence of the truncated recording cycle.

In a way, that issue sums up We Are Rising. All the ingredients are there, they’re just not combined in a wholly satisfying manner. Right now, if you want some electronic pop with orchestral lacings I’d go for the thoroughly excellent Apparat, or maybe Baths for something a bit more percussion-ridden.

The good news is that Lott is clearly a talent, with a rich array of tools and an advanced understanding of how to use them, and there’s a good chance he’ll return in two or three years with a real classic. In the meantime, We Are Rising is a decent enough listen. Just don’t expect anything astonishing.

Nothing astonishing? Really?

An album which has a track like 'Flickers' on it should be getting more than 7/10 imo. Overall, I think the album works really well, a strong 9/10 for me. I agree the next one could be a 10/10.

Hey Lilo. If I'm being honest, I had trouble downloading my review copy and so only had a couple of days to listen to it! Very hard to form a concrete opinion on a record in that space of time as I'm sure you know, and it certainly seemed like a grower. However, I listened to it as thoroughly as I could and 7/10 seemed fair, I liked it but it didn't quite 'wow' me.

This was my first DiS review so I appreciate the feedback =) Always good to hear other people's thoughts!

Not to worry, just a difference of opinion

very courageous to write a review. I know I could not do it myself!
I think it's one of those albums that will 'work' for some people and not for others. I think quite a few people will be put off by his voice. I quite like it myself.
I would also like him to do an instrumental album 'a la World's End Girfriend' mould. That would be something.

The review seems rushed, not the record!

A standout album in so many ways. A shame it will not find an audience it should among DiS readers as a result of the REVIEWER's hurry (ironically). In the crowded field of indie-this and indie-that, designed to wow you and die away by summer, this release stands out and deserves a thorough review.

As I said, I only had limited time to listen to the record. I didn't have as much time as I would've liked but I certainly didn't rush this review. I had made extensive notes and thought long and hard about the rating. 7 is quite a common rating and so I understand if it looks like I just slapped it on, but I can assure you I didn't
This is a complex record, and as I said it may grow on me further. Please bear in mind that a 7 doesn't mean I disliked it. 7 is good! But I've listened to a lot of albums this year and this isn't up there with my favourites.
Cheers for your thoughts.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon