- Artists:
- Marissa Nadler »
- Label:
- Box of Cedar »
Does music necessarily need to boldly make a point to be worthy of merit? A friend and I once had a debate about whether, to truly be considered art, a piece of music, painting or sculpture must specifically make a statement. He agreed with this point; I vehemently didn’t. Of course, it is necessary to have items of culture that push buttons, pull levers and propel platforms upwards to some higher plane. But wouldn’t the world be a dreary, obnoxious and pretentious place if we all did that? Sometimes music just needs to be something attractive, something to fill the space and time with a bit of atmosphere. Now I’m not necessarily talking about background music, no. And I’m certainly not talking about the current penchant for Tesco shopping trip 'Ooh, look at this!' derivative bullshit that spews from the assorted orifices of the major labels while they greedily rub their hands, greased by the cleavage sweat of Jessie J. But aurally massaging and satisfying music that is crafted and clever despite not changing the orbit of the planet? There’s nothing wrong with that. Right?
You might be able to predict where I’m going with this. But hold fire for a moment. The initial reaction upon listening to Marissa Nadler, the eponymous fifth record by the Boston based painter/singer, is to be smitten with just how strikingly beautiful it all sounds. Obviously, there’s her startling honey and sawdust voice: that angel-sucking-a-cigarette tone that could bring many grown men down onto their knees (and probably has done). Alongside this, producer Brian McTear creates a sparse, gossamer web of understated brush-drums, subtle acoustics and dreamy Fridmann-esque soundscapes that support her vocals on a hammock of cotton and silk. It’s unquestionably well put together musically and when it works, it carpets the album with a layer of magic complimenting the hanging questions and enticements falling from her lyrics. Opener ‘In Your Lair, Bear’ has a genuinely bruised, tender yearning running through its slow-burning fuse while ‘The Sun Always Reminds Me of You’ sees Nadler trying to reinvent the torch song as something more inverted and sensitive. But the highlight is undoubtedly ‘Puppet Master’, growing initially out of a mysterious sea-witch incantation amongst shipwrecked acoustic guitars with Nadler pleading “cobalt and sea / come back to me / I’ll never do you wrong”. And then, it suddenly transforms mid-song into an eastern-tinged lovelorn lament, dragged along by nagging guitars as the sound of waves breaking on a beach resonates in the background, before flipping back into dark mystery again. The contrast between the two is delectable and is a fine example of how the sweet and sour of her musical persona can, when used appropriately, be combined to dizzying effect.
But at that point, I refer back to my opening paragraph and prepare to slightly contradict myself. Despite how glorious the whole thing sounds, there is a continual critical doubt that keeps pulling at my sleeve whilst listening to the album. And the problem with Marissa Nadler as a composite piece of work is that the tracks and moments where it genuinely stands up proud and triumphant above the parapets are few and far between. That’s not to say that there’s anything poor on the record, there is not. As a matter of fact, there isn’t really anything that drops below the middle-ground bar. But at the same time, there isn’t too much that rises above that particular bar either. Shorn of the gothic gloom and striking visions of decay that defined her earlier work, much of the album is played out in a fairly safe environment of subtle longing, ethereal prettiness and fleetingly passionate musical parkland, without ever particularly reaching or hoping for anything more extreme or elaborate. It’s hardly a cardinal sin or an excuse to berate; but in contrast to her beautiful voice and the sheer quality from which the structure and tone of the record is built, there is an occasional lack of depth and exploration within the tracks that means that ultimately, the seduction of the first kiss doesn’t end up becoming something more profound and meaningful.
Ultimately, Marissa Nadler is a good record with a couple of standout moments within it. My only concern would be this: how often are you honestly going to play this record? It’s lovely for one or two listens but in view of the lack of truly momentous moments, I can see it being a record that spends less time embracing the drawer of your CD player than it may have otherwise done. That’s not to say that it is a poor, offensive or annoying record – it is far, far away from being any of those things. It’s just that when you strip away that beautiful voice and the devastatingly lush production, there isn’t honestly a huge deal going on here. But does that really matter? Because having said all that, I did enjoy listening to it. It lightened my morning blues, made me smile, it made me content. And even if I don’t ever listen again, that probably means that it fulfils its concept and raison d’etre. Music doesn’t always need to be about preaching, grand-slam bombastic leanings or pushing the envelope forward – that’s a fallacy. Sometimes it can just be sonically gorgeous, layered and pleasing to your hearing and thought - just as Marissa Nadler ends up being. I suppose we should all remember that a little more often. Or maybe that’s just me…
- Marissa Nadler - Marissa Nadler
- Spotifriday #90 - This week on DiS as a playlist ft. Björk, Fair Ohs, Spoon + more
- Watch: Marissa Nadler - 'Baby, I Will Leave You In The Morning'
- ATP Godspeed You! Black Emperor: the DiS review
- Help Marissa Nadler record her new album and receive nice things
- Gett OFF to Poland: a festival preview
- Win: trip to La Route Du Rock to see MBV, Horrors, Deerhunter, Grizzly Bear & more
- Rossi, Banhart and Nadler contribute to benefit compilation
I've had this record for about a month now (I was part of the kickstarter campaign)
and I play it about 2/3 times a week.
Hmmmmm
Seems like you had a crisis as a listener more than you reviewed this record. Sure, you've now questioned "what is the function of music?" and gotten it off your chest but you've done so at the expense of a really carefully crafted set of songs, it seems to me.
Because you can't figure out what mood you'd be in, or what activity you'd partake in, while listening to this record it's automatically a middling failure? Confusing.
So, since you asked, "how often are you honestly going to play this record?" I will answer you honestly. I've listened to it once a day, at least, since mid-May. It's great for meditative thinking, dinner parties, late night headphone sessions, careful listens while taking a walk, and it's the perfect soundtrack for reading off-the-mark pretentious zine ramblings of a writer running out of ways to experience and explain music.
I don't normally feel the need to reply to comments...
...and I'm not going to make a major exception now.
But I really think you need to re-read the review. You've got it wrong from so many angles that I don't even know where to start.
I liked the record. I gave it 6/10. I praised the good parts of it. It's not a hatchet job. I don't take snide pot-shots. No need to get upset.
Secondly, the "middling failure" (your words, not mine. And the album certainly isn't a failure) is because I feel too many of the tracks run out of ideas. I don't make any mention of how the mood or niche of the album leads it to not fulfilling its potential. That's just part of the review narrative.
I'm glad you like this record. And I'm also perfectly happy if you find what I write "off-the-mark pretentious zine ramplings". Opinions are a good thing; we should all have them. Just like my thoughts on this particular album. Music is a subjective pleasure. Getting angry just because someone has a different take or perception on something so subjective is completely ludicrous and ill-becoming.
Reply to Reply (which I don't normally do) [but I guess now I do]
While I respect you standing behind your position I have reread your review per your request and still stand behind my impression of it. In fact, I found more elements of your review that I strongly disagree with!
You say there's nothing "extreme or elaborate" on this record. Did you even register the song structure of "Baby, I Will Leave You In The Morning" during your listens? Were you not confounded by some of the complex fingerpicking patterns here? Does lyrical content such as a love song to a deceased, conjoined sibling somehow not meet the criteria for an attempt at an "extreme" reinterpretation of the modern day love song? Is there any chance that what you interpreted as "not a huge deal" and/or effortlessness is actually the massive, subtle, secret weapon of this album? This didn't reveal itself to me for about 5 or 6 listens but, boy oh boy, it is there.
Lastly, I wonder if you would have written the following sentence if your review had not been about a female songwriter. You wrote, "there’s her startling honey and sawdust voice: that angel-sucking-a-cigarette tone that could bring many grown men down onto their knees (and probably has done)." Just a quick perusal of your other reviews on this site reveals you don't often make sexual assumptions about what the artist's talents might do to the opposite sex. I wonder why?
I disagree, but then you already knew that from the review.
Your last comment however, is ridiculous. Music is sensual and affecting and I don't see how describing the possible effects of such a beautiful and seductive voice is a problematic thing. And I've made such comments plenty of times before.
When you're criticising the compliments I'm giving her way then I don't really see any resolution to this. As I say; you loved this record, I merely liked it. That is all.
i've got to agree with 'hinderwander' here.
i didnt see any such allusions in your Raging Speedhorn review.
Ah, the hazards of editorial control Jordan!
I wrote 500 words on the deep, seductive, loin-bothering wonder of Raging Speedhorn & how their first record was mine & my girlfriend's favourite music for romantic candlelit dinners.
But they edited it out. Said it was irrelevant. Phillistines! Now they'll never know how I feel about them. Probably why they split up ;-)



DiS meets John Lydon - Part 1: The Man
DiS Does Singles 20.05.13: Paramore, Laura Marling, The Replacements
DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Drowned in Bristol #12
DiS Does Singles 13.05.13: Swim Deep, These New Puritans, The National
Darkstar, Ed Harcourt, Halls, Wall +more for 3 DiS-curated nights at Great Escape 2013
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article