Sign In:

You are the quarry: Morrissey to sue NME, play more shows

Shrapnel continues to fly from the NME vs. Morrissey collision.

First, the singer pledged yesterday (29 Nov) to sue the music publication after they missed a 1pm deadline to issue an apology for running a feature that seems to paint the former Smiths man as a racist.

Further evidence has been produced implicating the magazine in what’s been described as a “hatchet-job” from voices in Morrissey’s camp – manager Merck Mercuriadis unveiling a letter written to NME editor Conor McNicholas before, apparently, the last issue - featuring these comments - went to press.

It reads:

“Dear Conor,

“Morrissey has completed the follow up with Tim
(Jonze, NME scribe and interviewer) and wants there to be no ambiguity in his position that he abhors racism. He has read your "Love Music Hate Racism" issue and believes in what you are doing. As a result he wants to pledge his support to the campaign and add a "Love Music Hate Racism" sticker to the forthcoming 7" cover mount giveaway as well as add the logo to our tickets and advertising for the forthcoming UK dates. I believe Morrissey's voice will be a very powerful one to have behind the campaign - particularly in light of his empathetic songs on the subject such as "I Will See You In Far-Off Places" and "Irish Blood, English Heart" - and it will let the world know how strongly he is opposed to racism and encourage his loyal fans to take the same position.

“I will prepare a press release immediately and get it to you by the end of my day.

“Best wishes,
Merck”

Mercuriadis alleges that McNicholas ignored the letter, re-wrote the interview – to the extent that original author Tim Jonze requested his name be removed from the feature - and plotted instead the “character assassination” on Morrissey.

“We can only guess that his personal agenda to unjustly smear Morrissey and sensationally sell more papers took priority over their commitment to this worthy campaign,” comments Mercuriadis, who claims, on contacting LMHR, that the organisation had heard nothing from McNicholas on the planned alterations.

Whether or not this shows Morrissey and Mercuriadis up as trying to worm their way out of an undoubtedly sensitive sitation, the dismissing of the letters by McNicholas could have consequences in the event of any legal action.

In other news, the singer confirmed some more dates on his tour in the new year – see below for full details:

January
21 London Roundhouse *
22 London Roundhouse *
23 London Roundhouse *
25 London Roundhouse *
26 London Roundhouse *
27 London Roundhouse *
30 Doncaster Dome

February
1 Sunderland Empire
2 Edinburgh Playhouse

* = sold out


Got news? Email us at newsdesk@drownedinsound.com for back slaps and a credit...

I think J-Lo said it best when she uttered that immortal line

'It's turkey time, gobble, gobble'

^ :-D ^

I saw him at the Donny Dome

in the early 90s and it wasn't too pleasant...

I suppose, even given all that's happened this week, nothing can ever be as bad as a gig promoting the album Kill Uncle. In Doncaster.

I'd like to hear

J Lo say "It's turkey time, gobble gobble". I think that'd just about make my day...

god

I abhor Conor McNicholas

It would be fantastic

If Moz actually had a hand in finally putting the NME out of business, at least as a print publication. Maybe he could drop a piano on Mike Joyce while he's at it?

I might just have to do that

but why did they devote three whole chapters to the review when it was clearly a load of wankamuffin?

It does

People took Jonze's email to mean the NME sensationalised his interview, but according to Jonze, they toned it down. Both sides seem to be coming out of this quite badly.

i dont think

anyone is gonna come out of this one smelling like roses...

Holy fuck

He's playing Sunderland.

Biggest ticket in that town for years!

Jonze was always going to backup NME

All he's saying is he would have put an even worse spin Morrissey's comments. I don't know why people have been seeing Jonze as the hero in all this. He was the one who saw a scoop and a chance to make a name for himself and decided to extend the immigration angle of the article in the first place.

does anyone know

the legal ins and outs of this? i obviosuly dont i was just wondering whether these are grounds for sueing?

not really...

whats that old saying...'it's only slander/defamation if it's not true.'

not really...

whats that old saying...'it's only slander/defamation if it's not true.'

for crying in a

bucket. If I hear one more sad, 35 year-old man declaim 'Oh the NME's not like it used to be, y'know', I shall drop a piano on myself.

It's not the passing of some halcyon magazine age you're mourning, chum, it's your own youth. If you're not a teenager, then why do you feel you have any franchise in whether it is or isn't any good anyway? Shut up your face and get back to dribbling incontinently over Beirut, or Dan Deacon, or Emmy The Great, or somesuch insufferably worthy act.

"Oh, I remember receiving a Jesus and Mary Chain cover-mount flexi-disc in 1985. Its been downhill ever since." Excuse me while I anaesthetise my frontal lobes.

There's a shop in Soho that sells back-issues from the 80s and 90s. Go down there and tell me whether the Tim Booth cover emblazoned "Are James ready for superstardom?" strikes you as eternally relevant.

The point is, its not mean to be. NME's a defiantly pop-music oriented weekly aimed at actual young people, not those who merely fantasise about an idealised youth.

Alternatively, if you want to be all snooty and grown-up, you can read Kev Kharas or Dom Passantino talking down to you and polishing their scenester credentials right here right now. Go do it!

Anyway, Conor may be a dick, but guys, have you ever actually met Sean Adams? Dick.

The NME..

Cant even write intelligently about music why are they bothering with "politics"

Racist not Racist? Who even fucking cares...in fact who even reads the NME anymore?

Hmm

I certainly suspect that many people have become disillusioned with the NME as they have merely 'outgrown' it in some way. .And I really dont know why people would actually feel compelled to complain about the NME unless they had some sentimental attachment to it formed in their youth.

However, its role within the British music scene and general ethos has definitely shifted at various points during its existence. Major changes seem to have occurred at the start of this decade, prompted by the emergence of the internet, file sharing and sites of this nature, I imagine. It had to alter its approach in order to survive.

attila ...

you totally miss the point. Of course the NME may not be right in holding out James, Gay Dad or whoever out for superstardom in the past. But if I look back at my old NMEs, regardless of the bands they were covering the thing had lots more pages which was a direct result of the reviews, interviews and features being of a higher, more detailed quality (bar the singles reviews which have always been throwaway snippets). It was less like a flimsy magazine with a load of soundbites, advertising and posters.

I can read NME in Sainsburys now in about 10 minutes. Old NMEs used to be at least a couple of days worth of reading the interviews and features.

This ^^

I was going to post pretty much this exact point. It's all very well saying "You don't like the NME now because you're old", but that ignores the fact that the quality and quantity of the writing has clearly, unarguably declined. And I speak as someone who actually does own boxes of NMEs from the 90s with which to do a valid comparison.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon