Implode.Exploit. Repeat
virtual-court.com, june 2004, 9:52am. London.
- Judge: Bring out the mp3s! Mister.pee-free, you are charged with the man slaughter of the music industry!
Compere: Let me hear a biiig ’Fuck yeah!
Judge: You are also charged with the murder of global culture and the creation of the terrorbucks empire, how do you plead…?
Fast forward to the present day…
….And the whole coke-addled music biz, right now, somewhere in west London and LA, is in total disarray, firing staff and hoping that television-made stars, for television-infatuated people, people who don’t actually care if things are good, bad, terrible, covers or even nazi anthems, just aslong as it has a good melody and someone they just maybe could fuck - if they lost 4 stone and got a facelift, a thirty quid hair cut and a life away from the goggle box, obviously.
But, yeee-haaaah, mp3s, lassoo 'em up and shoot 'em down, they are at the core of the end of the music industry and the entertainment business for that matter and probably all the creative industries too, probably. Let’s face it, we all go out and buy 10 albums a week, at £10+ each, regardless of what it is, just as long as we’re immersed in the advertising on every street corner and there’s some good hype by sun journalists and Jonafon Woss! We can do this because we all work jobs we hate, with people who oggle over Heat and think watching Channel 4 news makes you an auntie-christ. Pah.
There’s a problem, accepted, but I’ve got news for you: It’s not because of mp-fucken-threes! And it’s more than just the music bizness that is suffering! And who apart from the music industry cares about those poor suffering people able to get paid for working with something they love? NO FUCKERZ!!! That’s who.
Who are our cultural icons, our teenage role models, the people who wish we were nowadays? Where for art thou David Bowie of 2002 or Iggy Pops or Kurt Cobains, Blondies, Lydons, Princes, Stevie Wonders, Otis Reddings, Wacko Jackos.. See what I mean? Not the copies, the coca-cola endorsed real things! And not just that, people are taking idiots with high pitch voices seriously! Where is the proper public dissenters, the ones telling kidz to spit on the monarchy in page 4 of the daily mirror? Where are the outlandish trend setters? The people bigging up life-changing books, places and people? Shirley Manson and Roddy Woomble? Maybe for a brief half a second when they have an album out, when people are even giving half a shit. I guess the Massive Attack guys and Damon Albarn are saying something, but why would you or I wanna be them? Or follow their advice? What have they ever, really, given you? Free gigs? £25 japanese imports, that's what!
Let’s also bare in mind that in days gone by, our entertainment exports, were our countries biggest exports, right from the Beatles to Morecambe and Wise. Maybe it’s the covert American colonisation of the world that I want to rant about here, not that the music industry hasn't invested in developing genuine, back-catalogue-selling (which is where the real money is people!), life-changing, genre-breaking, timeless, classic, TALENT! Not winners of shopping-centre contests with nice guys, sweet gals and a good bodies! Brains? Who cares?
Also, I blame media hype. It's not the bands, the ones who barely get away with ripping off bands who were big once (see also: Nickleback, The Strokes, Datsuns, Cast…) selling records to people who aren't old or informed enough to realise it's all been done better before. Blame the A&R's who're trying to regain their yoof! Blame the journalists confused about what is new and what sounds like things they used to like, when they loved music...
And blame the bands who are wasting money, those tried and tested wrinklers, who haven’t been dropped and haven't released anything any good since their debut or that tricky second album at best (see also: Oasis, Reef, Supernaturals, Suede…) these are bands who’ve had their day, can’t cut it anymore and maybe if they keep churning out an album to the marketing departments rota, every 2years, at vast recording costs, living off the back of one hit single and a few thousand fans, they might, eventually, 9 albums down the line, do something interesting again. But who gives a fuck? And is that economical or exciting? Can we grow old with bands like that? I wanna be able to listen to the Cure and Jesus and Mary Chain and Fairport Convention, like the oldies do, and remember who, what, where I was then, when everything made sense amongst the angst and beer.
There’s also the fact loads of bands rush their first album because they have a single all over the airwaves. Take-away food! Rush-Rush-Zoom! What is value? What’s meaning? What’s respect? What’s being proud? Who, what, where am I?
And these rushed albums, these all filler albums, with nothing much for the fans (see also: The Hives, The Vines, My Vitriol), who could, in all honesty, just have done mini albums, or EPs (remember them?) and kept fans happy, people interested in music and the buzz going for the first album, proper, when the band had a chance to develop in a live context with people watching (rather than the bull’n’gate, etc) and let’s not forget, people actually buying singles, with good packaging, goodies and all that, instead of just getting the single and maybe 2 half-good tracks and 9 they write in the studio. Bollocks to this. Who gives a fuck, I’d rather just have b-sides on a 'product' that had some thought and love go into it. Hundred Reasons album having most of the ep tracks on their fans already got, what's the point?
Seek. Exploit. Market.
Repeat.
But who should we really be blaming? The Man, of course! Yes, him/her/it, with ones mansion and story about once upon a time finding a band that meant something. Actually, maybe they just employ all the best people and have decades of experience of how to sell records in shops, so yeah, that said, it's cus they can't sell music online, that's the problem, surely. Bollocks is it! Maybe point your speed-soaked pinkies to the people with the exciting bands, who’re afraid to sell out (don’t get me started!!!) and spread the amazing bands around, get them out there, market them and blimey, get people hearing great music if that’s such a crazy idea? (see also: Fat Cat, Southern, one-man-labels). This is all nearly as crazy as people embracing the internet and using free downloads to sell albums, like singles and radio play do. We need a paradigm shift, a transition, something pioneering and revolutionary to happen! But we need the acts to do it, to inspire first and to do that, they need acts to inspire people, and to do that, they need stars and do get them, they need to know what a star is, rather than what photographs well and can have their voice EQ’d well in a studio.
Walk.
Don't Walk!
In conclusion - if you’re a moron - I’m saying, stop blaming mp3s, stop being so fucken negative, stop being SO elitist, stop wasting SO very much money and killing cultures! I want history made now for all the good bits that are never forgotten! I want everyone out there to feel a part of the movement because they are, or at least could be. Give up on these constipated heroes/zeros! I want another renaissance! I don’t want to be forever in reality, we all need things to take us elsewhere, but should it be drugs? And most of all, I don’t want to live in a town which is just like any other town in America or Tibet or Bland-land: US State 20055. I want things around me to define me, to make me who I am, a stronger, more self-aware, more world-conscious, better person and most of all, I wanna find myself surrounded by people I actually want to whisper to ”Look at the stars, look how they shine for you” and I don’t mean cheesily to a lover, because I’ve found one of them, somehow. And I can grin and be happy, because I’ve got my Trail o’Dead, my Cooper Temple Clause, my Arab Strap, my Queens of the Stoneage, my Oceansize, my Kinesis, my iDLEWiLD, my Weezer, my Sigur Ros, my Burning Airlines, and my Elliot Smith back catalogue; to keep lil ol’ me happy, inspired, defined and thinkin’ about STUFF!
- "No one wants to spend fifty minutes with an album if it’s all just misery" - DiS meets Aidan Moffat
- Aidan Moffat releases Oh! What A Night Before Christmas
- Drowned in Scotland: December
- Listen: Aidan Moffat and Malcolm Middleton cover Slow Club
- Aidan Moffat on Getting Older...
- Watch: 'And So Must We Rest' by Aidan Moffat & Bill Wells (DiS exclusive)
- Mixtape Monday: 10 Songs That influenced Mogwai by Stuart Braithwaite
- A Decade of Glasgow bands
Re: Implode.Exploit. Repeat
"the record label is taking a bit of a risk, but can't really loose"
Er, yes it can. If the act doesn't sell (m)any copies of the music that the label forked out cash to have made, they'll obviously not get their investment back let alone make a profit. So, actually, they will lose (money), and therefore have no choice but to drop the artist for future releases (because the risk of the same thing happening again is too great).
As for the case with Robbie, he probably did get a lump sum, but that will be because he's already made his forthcoming album and so on handing over the rights to publish it to EMI, they pay him for the privilege. And yes, as people have pointed out, part of that deal includes him giving a share of merchandise, touring and other revenue streams - EMI's Alain Levy and David Munns said to the LA Times: "Our goal is to transform EMI from a recording company into a music company that shares in all kinds of revenue generated by the artist. Dem boyz is gettin clever - they're already doing it with the Coldplay, Queen, Gorillaz and Kylie webstores (amongst others, no doubt).
Out of interest Sean, what single label actually has 100 acts all promoting their own releases at the same time? And when has a label ever been stoopid enough to put out 15 records all at the same time? There's no point exaggerating to prove a point if you ask me.
At the end of the day, the only way of measuring how good something is, is by looking at whether it's achieving what it set out to do. Surely the fact that record companies haven't gone bust may say something about that.
Major labels have many uses indeed. One of them is they sign both pop acts and more alternative acts, and are able to take money earnt from the successful pop acts and invest it in the less popular ones. For instance, The Cooper Temple Clause being on the same label as Will Young and Gareth Gates (BMG). Those karaoke stars have probably helped TCTC get where they are now and will probably continue to do so.
Re: Implode.Exploit. Repeat
So when did it actually 'mean anything'?! Perhaps you're just getting older and realising that all isn't (and has never been) so rosy.
MP3s aren't killing anything and nobody ever said they were. What the labels have been reported as blaming for sales being down is piracy and illegal Internet filesharing. MP3s - compressed music files - are already legally available from major/indie labels. See emusic.com - undoubtedly the best value you'll get for about £7 (actual price $9.99USD) a month for unlimited downloads from their huge archives.
Re: Implode.Exploit. Repeat
Erm, except that only about 10 albums a year sell over a million copies in the UK anyway, and those albums are by either pop, easy listening or gentle indie-style acts (last year, for instance, they were Dido, Robbie Williams, David Gray, Gabrielle, Steps and Eva Cassidy, with Stereophonics, Travis, Destiny's Child, Kylie Minogue, Shaggy, Westlife and Hear'Say coming close). And the mainstream public who are the people who are able to buy a million copies don't want something that sounds like it was recorded in a toilet.
Your flawed maths also completely forget that for EMI to make £13,713,000,000, the public would have to collectively buy 1,430,000,000 albums in a year, when at the moment the total is morelike 100,000,000. So you're basically saying people would have to spend 14 times as much money on music as they currently do. Yeah. Right.
Oh, and you also forget that EMI don't get 100% of the money for a CD handed over at the counter. The retailer takes a 30%ish cut, and then there's the distributors, and then a lot of stuff has to be paid for such as the manufacturing, the publishing (fees and royalty), the marketing, general overheads, and of course, the recording royalties for the bands, before getting down to profit left for them.
What I think you need to appreciate is that most people aren't really into music and only buy a handful of CDs a year, and that's it's far more cost-effective to release something that they, the masses, will want, instead of pandering to the needs of the minority music fans like us. Why invest in hundreds of smaller acts, and probably only have a tiny fraction actually make the money back that will be spent on them, when you can invest in a couple of big ones where success is pretty much guaranteed?!
"Record companies dislike MP3s so much because they create wiser consumers."
Nah. Record companies dislike people stealing their music (it's nothing to do with MP3 as a format) because then they don't get the profit they are entitled to (for investing in the music in the first place). The decreased sales figures that have just been published do demonstrate that something is wrong.
"Before, magazines would hype up albums and you'd shell out your cash. If you were disappointed, well, tough titty."
Since when? You've always been able to go into HMV, buy a CD, take it home and give it a listen, then if you don't like it, take it back next week to swap for something else. Stores have also had llistening posts for years, and now official artist sites offer the online equivalent.
"Nowadays people avoid buying music they don't like by listening to it first."
So are you saying that people didn't used to have the common sense to try before they buy?!?
"On the flipside, how many people buy albums as a result of hearing tracks online first?"
I do! I do! I hear them online via the streams offered by the labels themselves (often via 3rd parties like NME.COM/DiS/e-cards etc.), then I go out and buy them (or order them online for cheap 'cos then I don't need to help pay for pretty shop displays and checkout tills).
"As well as MP3s, there's also fantastic sites like www.launch.com -- if record companies embraced the Internet pro-actively they could target the right people for less money."
Erm, how do you think the music gets onto launch.com? They can't just make magic it up out of thin air - it all comes from the labels. Hence they are already doing what you suggest.
P.S. The White Stripes are shite no matter how much or how little they spend on their recording process.
Re: Implode.Exploit. Repeat
You're right, people try not to keep making the same mistakes, but to be honest I'd say that mainstream music buyers are pretty happy with what they buy. They've heard the singles on the radio, day-in day-out, so they know what kind of thing they're getting.

Reading Juice?
Favourite 50: The Cooper Temple Clause See This Through And Leave (chosen by Dom Gourlay)
A Decade of Glasgow bands
Arab Strap
Queens of The Stone Age
The Cooper Temple Clause
Elliott Smith
Champion Sound #13: Part 1 – Ten Yeezus Pieces
Parklife Weekender 2013 – The Drowned in Sound Review
Drowned In Sheffield #14
DiS Does Singles 17.06.13: Dornik, Washed Out, AlunaGeorge
All Hail the Culturati... Fighting Over Radiohead's Hail to the Thief
Cutting Through the Noise: What it's really like representing new artists at events like The Great Escape
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article