Sign In:
17047
Type: Album Release date: 02/10/2006
Your Rating:

There’s a conspiracy. A wilful negligence of some kind and I can no longer ignore it or pretend that it’s a common, garden-variety mistake. Not for the first time, a major release has eased its way into the office some time after it made a whole lot of difference whether or not we reviewed it; a whole week after a significant number of people have already been prescribed - what music junkies refer to as a bad dose - via predictably gushing reviews from juiced-in rags and psychosis-inducing radio. It’s only after they’ve choked it down and the acid burn has had time to induce a bilious rage that some people realise it wasn’t really the fix they needed.

Suffice to say it’s happened again with The Killers; the lateness, that is. I’d like to think that being the wildcard, untameable mavericks we are, marketing overlords are worried to the extent that they don’t want to risk a million album sales on the whim of a loose reviewer; one liable to trash it as “The godawful Killers album”, as I referred to it as to a close friend, shortly after listening to Sam’s Town right through for the first time. The reality, however, is that we didn’t receive Sam’s Town because whatever we say, or any one else says for that matter, it won’t make a blind bit of difference to the destiny of this release. Even in a climate where music fans’ band loyalty album-to-album is on the wane, this second Killers effort will burn an inevitably hard, straight line to multi-platinum sales.

From the off, The Killers have elbowed their way into that exclusive club occupied by over-earnest fist-clenchers, and set about clawing their way to the pinnacle by drawing influence from every one of them, at the same time. The resulting soup is a dead-cert recipe for sales due to the sheer number of bases covered by this kind of wagon-hopping. Sometimes, however, it is less a kaleidoscopic masterstroke than a spew-flecked tableau like ‘Midnight Show’. It was ‘All These Things’ which really did it, though. A song which played directly into the vocal range of eighty-five per cent of its audience and slow-burned its way into their hearts with the kind of unifying power that has grown men in stadium-sized crowds saluting the stage like grunts in some kind of totalitarian display of strength. I know: I was one of them ferchristsakes.

While The Killers are approaching Sam’s Town from a slightly different angle, talk of a paradigm shift is nonsense. It is very much a progression of Hot Fuss, with more meat and less fluff. If anything, the influences are even more apparent, particularly the bombast of U2 (which I’ve always though is one of The Killers’ most obvious traits). In fact, the ghost of Bono and company hovers over this band like some imminent possession; to the extent that in recruiting U2 collaborators like Flood and Anton Corbjin, it’s quite clearly an obsession. A tacit admission that Flowers is aiming for the stars. But we knew that already; pretentiousness will not be diluted, neither by purchasing a synthesizer nor by effecting metrosexuality.

The oft-levelled Bruce Springsteen influence on Sam’s Town is undeniable, and while musically this may not be particularly evident (other than on ‘The River Is Wild’), Flowers - whilst occasionally straying into the realms of Meatloaf (‘When We Were Young’) - commits admirably to the Boss’s blueprint. It’s in the way he tries to manhandle the vocals, bending them to his will where in the past he has struggled to cope. Indeed, there is still an element of him occasionally being steamrolled by a song, leaving him clinging on, but his knack with melody is undeniable and infectious, and in songs like ‘Why Do I Keep Counting’ and ‘My List’ anthems abound.

Essentially, The Killers still sound like the Killers – a very clever pastiche. But here’s the bit I don’t understand. After an initial revulsion, with each forced listen Sam’s Town increasingly sounds like a tonic. It gets easier on the ears: the initially jagged layers weave themselves together and the hooks start to snag. Bit by bit this album wound me in, to the point where I like it. I really like it.

Taken as a body of work it is certainly more consistent than Hot Fuss. It hangs together more coherently, being less reliant on obvious-single fodder, and is sequenced to encourage repeated playback in its entirety. In the end, whether or not you like Sam’s Town will depend heavily on the degree to which you like, or can tolerate, Flowers’ delivery. It does grate – to my ears at least – but if you can learn to live with it then there is a studied but incredibly rewarding trove of songs to discover.

Having their glare set so single-mindedly on the trophy might ultimately be what topples The Killers. Parody, even honest plagiarism, has a tendency to send acts onto the skids as their trajectory levels out, and whether or not The Killers will topple or join the stalwarts they’ve set their sights on will depend on their ability to make the high-speed leap from this particular kart to one of their own.

spot on review

This is just how I felt about this album.

It's stadium rock perfection, hook after hook after hook. Each song trouncing the one before for anthemic bliss until 'Why do I keep counting?' blows them all away with It's monstrous singalong chorus.

I hated this band now I find them rather agreeable.

i concur also!

when i first heard the killers ripping off the boss i was thinking that i'd never buy the idea

the more i hear when we were young the more i'm like 'yeah, it's not a bad song' but i haven't bought the album yet.

i'll like it if they either
a) only have slight springsteen influence
b) 100% ape him so it just sounds like a springsteen record

the best review

i have read on here for some time.

it's even enough to make me open soulseek, type the name in and nick it.

still not gonna buy it though, they're not gonna need my dough- this will sell like hotcakes.

apparently they sell very well in some places.

Problem is, it's not 1987 anymore

It's almost '07 and this music sounds dated. Doesn't matter how competent they are, how catchy the tunes, how well-produced, it still sounds stale, programmed, market-analyzed, processed, and tableau-spewed right into that great flaming void which is Modern Rock Radio. Why does DiS review this kind of stuff? Why am I writing this? Am I a butterfly dreaming that I am a band called the Killers from Las Vegas, plasticfuck capital of Western Civilization? Or am I a band called the Killers dreaming I'm fucking U2 20yrs ago when stadium rock mattered?

Why, why, oh-why-why....

good review.

I felt that very way about the albumn, it seems to be the anti kasabian record. gets better the more you hear it, kasabian, gets more dull.

dont like it

liked the first, but this one is AWFUL. the production doesnt suit the new style they're trying to write in, lyrics are worse than on the first record and the boss aping is fucking awful. i hate the single more every time i hear it. negativity negativity negativity. LBUELBURGH!

Fair Review

I like the Killers very much. I too, liked this record upon playing ita few times. Hot Fuss was the same way. I didn't like that record at all until it was pounded in my head by a friend, and even to this day, I only like a few songs from that record. Sam's Town is different. The songs really do stick with you. I don't hear the Boss' influence all over this record. More U2 as the review mentioned. I do agree though more with the statement that on this record, the Killers still sound like the Killers-- and maybe that is their biggest fault. There are many people who never liked them in the first place. All that being said, I think this is a solid effort, and the record is more artistically cohesive then the previous one. I'd give it about a 7 or 8 -- so in short I agree with this review more than many others that I've read. And point well taken, only the Killers can prove if they are meant to stick around longer than most of their peers (I think they have the talent to). But, I'm prone to agree that their place in the history of rock and roll is theirs to earn or lose.

I'm Still Debating

If I'll Like It. I Loved The First Album For Its Sheer Sing-a-long-abilty, But If This Release Is Anything Like 'When We Were Young', I Wont Bother. Its Put Me Off Listening To It For This Long.

chris almighty

that cunt's voice has got to be the most annoying sound since a pneumatic drill once copped off with the squeaky bint out of will and grace

I REALLY

like this album.

And I have great taste.

DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE

DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE etc

well

shit name for an album really

This album is irritating.

It takes 3 listens to get into, and then a few listens after that I'm sick of it.

Without doubt the best song on it is Exitlude. The rest is just too pompous, and workmanlike at times, apart from When You Were Young. I'd give it a 6 out of 10 though.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon