- Artists:
- Scissor Sisters »
- Label:
- Polydor »
Scissor Sisters' electro-pop defined mainstream music in the Noughties, with every producer, songwriter and pop artist clawing for a bit of their success. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, though possibly not when that imitation is Mika. Even though Scissor Sisters have been consumed, digested and regurgitated by the mainstream, ‘Comfortably Numb’ was still a defining moment in pop.
But, when everyone else steals your band’s identity, what’s your next move going to be? With electro now being a staple of most mainstream pop from faux feminist Katy Perry to jailbait Cyrus and bucktooth Bieber, what exactly is the Scissor Sisters' niche? It’s obviously been something they’ve been have been contemplating over the past three years; Night Work is their second attempt at a third album after they were told by Elton John, on hearing their first attempt, to stock up on the pro plus and fags and get back to studio.
Rather than forging out a new identity for the band, Night Work, like some warped Buffalo Bill, tries on the skins of the corpses of hit songs from the past 40 years. Opener ‘Night Work’ has the howling riff of Duran Duran’s ‘Hungry Like The Wolf’; ‘Harder You Get’ takes on the drowning sleazy synths of Iggy’s The Idiot; ‘Sex And Violence’ has the same tense beat and desperation of Bronski Beat’s, ‘Smalltown Boy’.
You can’t focus on the quality of the actual tracks, as it becomes a distracting game of ‘guess that tune’. ‘Invisible Light’, starts off promisingly, with no discernable aural theft; the chorus is infectious and club beats create a driving pulse. But, as the beat drops an unnecessary “mwah, ha, ha, ha” voice of God a la Michael Jackson's Thiller interrupts and you’re yet again left guessing guess as to what the real identity of the band is. Lyrically, it’s like Keith Lemon’s black book with fake tan stains on the stuck together pages. ‘Running Out’ starts with some serious heavy breathing and ‘Any Which Way’ has Anna Matronic putting on her best phone sex voice for: “take me anyway you like it, in front of the fire place, in front your yacht, in front of my parents, I don’t give a damn baby, take me!”. Not sure, what the bum tapping masses of Asda are going to think when it ends up in their shopping basket next to a copy of Now, but it's hardly the sweet sentiment of ‘Take Your Mama’.
From Bowie to Ga Ga, some of the most memorable pop records are built on clichés about hedonism and sex. And, fair enough, the Sisters probably aren't being too serious. But it all feels a bit too top shelf, from the butt clenching cover up, with Jake Shears' tongue is so firmly in his cheek, it’s nearly puncturing flesh.
Night Work is a pastiche of Scissors Sisters’ former glories that sees the band desperately sewing together the leftover scraps of their idols in a vain attempt to recapture the pertinence of their debut. In an era when electro is pop, Scissor Sisters needed to deliver a record that reinvented them rather than reproducing the same tired tricks that half the charts are now turning. This is not it.
- In Photos: Scissor Sisters @ Shepherds Bush Empire, London
- Scissor Sisters - Magic Hour
- Splendour 2011: The DiS review
- Scissor Sisters - Night Work
- Summercase in your face: first information on exciting Spanish festival
- Scissor Sisters fans "soul-sucking," says Ditto
- Kylie WON'T play Glastonbury, after all
- Scissor Sisters - Land of a Thousand Words
It's Night WORK, not Nightlife
One can usually make an album review a tad more valid if they can get the title of the album correct. Makes us all wonder if you really listened to it or just skimmed over.
It's quite meh
The debut is honestly one of my favourite debuts of the past decade and as such it's annoying to see that the band who made it can't seem to follow it up with anything good. Ta-Dah was patchy as all hell, this one's consistent in style but someone forgot to actually write songs to go with it. It's just dull. That said, Invisible Light is BRILLIANT - shame it just feels like such a waste for it to find its home on this.
Ta-Dah
was indeed a huge disappointment following up the classic debut. The fact that it took them 3 yrs and several tries to release this album shows they've lost their confidence. Haven't heard this yet, I'll be buying it this week, but most reviews are positive this one's the odd one out.
Yeah on early listens
this seems like a case of further diminishing returns, which is a shame after the very good debut album. And Fire With Fire is terrible.
Ta-Dah
Ta-Dah is superior to Scissor Sisters and I could care less who disagrees.
Also
P.S. This review is bullshit. You can tell the reviewer didn't really listen to the album just from her careless mistakes. Poor journalism. Come correct or don't come at all.
scissor sisters live
The pure joy of the Scissor Sisters is their live performance. I have seen them live on every UK tour. They are a band who actually care about putting on a show, giving a polished performance and connecting with the audience. Their ticket prices are ridiculously low - the best value ever. Money well spent - I could not see how this tour could equal the previous two, but it did and now I begin the looooooong wait for their next one. For me Scissor Sisters can do no wrong - a feel good, joy inspiring celebration of all that is happiness in this world. Thank you Scissor Sisters.
Ta-dah +
I agree that Ta-Dah was a better album than their original outing.
It covered considerable ground style/genre wise, something that's very rare these days and one of the only other person doing it with any assurance these days is Mika, regardless of the facile comment about him in this "review."
I've heard Shears describe this album as having a "slimmer colour palette," than "Ta-Dah," and there's no denying that.
It seems to draw on and distill a considerable number of 70's/80's motifs and references, some of which are bleeding obvious, moving beyond pastiche to downright rip-off!
But, who cares? they do it so well and their musical and harmonic language means that they are more accomplished at delivering well developed songs than some of the people they imitate.
I'm sure there's much more to come from this band and the fact that they have a number of high(er) profile stars in their fan base speaks volumes.
Ever so often, real talent is not recognized till it's passed. I don't think this will be the case..
And, crikey, it's only their 3rd album. If the'yre not "getting it right," at this stage, there's plenty of time..and one of the many things to be admired about this outfit, all camp theatrics aside, is that they really think about what they're doing and are totally professional with it.
In these days of plastic, instant pop stars, they're (still) a breath of fresh air, as, if you're any sort of musician, you'd realize Ms Wood..
Sometimes talent is beyond "niche markets."
Rich.
x
Ta-Dah unfairly gets written off by many for being deliberately less hook-laden than its predecessor. It forsakes immediacy for craft, as evident in the increased sophistication and deftness of the arrangements. While their debut was a near-flawless collection of songs, that's exactly just what it is--a collection. It didn't particularly coalesce well as a coherent album, often gliding schizophrenically from track to track. The only reason it worked is because each song was instantly memorable. Ta-Dah concerns itself more with presentation while dialing back on the kitschiness that pervaded that first album. Its strength is not in providing cheap pop thrills. Instead, it is a wonderfully crafted pop album with a genuine sense of creative inspiration. Ta-Dah is a more mature, subdued effort, but more careful examination, which it wasn't given, proves it to be even more essential than the album that staked their claim to fame. Its songs are exquisitely constructed, with wildly imaginative flourishes, i.e. the banjo and barrelhouse pianos in "I Can't Decide," the scribbled synth work in the introduction to "The Other Side," and the soulful sitar riffs of "Might Tell You Tonight." Ta-Dah is an album in the truest sense, opting to be taken seriously as a whole rather than cherry-picked for hit singles. It's handsomely packaged and the songs are fluid and congruent. It really deserves a reappraisal and with time, I believe it will be recognized as their high-point.
Its hard for pop bands
to make a good album after a successful one cause record companies will copy anything that makes them lots of money. So its hard to stay fresh when everyones copying you.
I'll listen to it but I don't have high expectations.
getting the name of an album wrong...
pretty much DiScredits any review.



"More bands should split up" - Brett Anderson opens up to DiS about the return of Suede
Drowned in Manchester #15 – May 2013
armchair dancefloor 39: Mount Kimbie interview, Bobby Browser, Powell, Move D, Leon Vynehall...
DiS meets John Lydon - Part 1: The Man
DiS Does Singles 20.05.13: Paramore, Laura Marling, The Replacements
DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article