- Artists:
- Nirvana »
Nirvana's 1992 Reading headline slot is one with a place in rock mythology both definite and vague. Let's start with the definites, several of which are confirmed by the rather tardy issue of this DVD/CD package. It was definitely the last gig Nirvana ever played in the UK. Everett True definitely pushed a mock wheelchair-bound Kurt Cobain onto the stage. The gig definitely had some moments that could be described as on the sloppy side, but for all that it could definitely be described as a pretty triumphant affair.
Still, was it an 'important' gig? Many point to their 1991 set at the same festival as the better show; certainly Live at Reading lacks the sense of occasion of MTV Unplugged, while as a summary of their live career as an electric band, the 13-year-old From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah isn’t harmed by being culled from multiple concerts. The whole would they/wouldn't they play drama certainly doesn’t come across as a big deal on the DVD; True's wheeling on of Cobain is over before it begins, a flippant joke that doesn't seem especially morbid, even in hindsight. For all the vaunted lack of rehearsal, the band are actually pretty tight, bar an intentionally ragged encore. Excised from the history books is some dude called Tony, a strange looking man possessed of what I can only conclude is a early Nineties haircut, dancing between Cobain and Krist Novoselic for the whole show, his presence unremarked upon until well over an hour in, when Cobain smirkingly notes that "he still writes all our songs". Listen to the CD and little of this is even apparent. It's a good gig, but I wonder if it isn’t a bigger deal to the British than to Nirvana-philes as a whole.
That taken into account, it’s actually the sense of not being a big deal that makes Live At Reading such a blast. The film stock is cheap, and the combination of the tiny early Nineties stage and the decision to shoot virtually nothing bar Cobain, Novoselic and Tony (i.e almost no crowd shots) gives the impression of a far more intimate show than was the case. Then we have the fact that while all of Nevermind bar ‘Something in the Way’ gets an airing, this is a 25 song set, without Butch Vig on hand to lacquer everything into oblivion. The best bits of Bleach and Incesticide buzz and growl freely amidst a bristling sea of roughed up Nevermind material, an early smattering of In Utero tracks (fully formed versions of ‘All Apologies’ and ‘Dumb’ suggesting a rather less visceral record than the one more faithfully pointed to by ‘Tourette’s’) and a couple of sludgy punk covers (Fang’s ‘The Money Will Roll Right In ‘ and Wipers’ ‘D-7’). It’s a satisfyingly vicious brew, an engaged, passionate performance, with the only indication of the band’s unease with success being a sardonic snatch of Boston’s ‘More Than A Feeling’ prior to ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ (rather grumpily left off the CD) and a mangled ‘Star Spangled Banner’ at the end, presumably an ironic Woodstock nod. It probably goes without saying that the songs are almost uniformly magnificent, but certainly the band seem as aware as anyone as to which bits of Bleach were the keepers.
So it’s good, but given the large amount of quality Nirvana concert stuff out there, does Live At Reading really have much by way of USP? Probably, yeah, if only because it's the band's sole full electric gig commercially available (bar the early one on the second disc of the Bleach reissue). It also offers an alternate take on Nevermind for those who can do without the claggy production. It looks and sounds intimate and punk rock, and there’s no undue flattering of Dead Icon Kurt Cobain. Above all it’s a good concert of mostly exceptional songs.
Still, calling Live At Reading essential in the greater scheme of Nirvana releases is pushing it; it’s notable that Cobain only chose one excerpt (‘Lithium’) for the project that became Live! Tonight! Sold Out!!. There are those who are just going to enjoy gawping at said Dead Icon, but the whole thing is shot in so no-frills a fashion that I found myself switching to the CD the second time around. Here, I’ve got to gripe that the cuts made to accommodate everything on one disc renders it somewhat impersonal: no ‘More Than A Feeling’, very little banter, an excessively terse pace that takes away some of the concert ‘feel’; maybe splitting it over two CDs would have been excessive, but certainly it’s a lot less personable than MTV Unplugged as a result. It is also, pretty undeniably, a pre-Christmas cash in.
But take that on board and you’re golden. This isn’t the stuff of myth or legend; it’s three great musicians playing some wonderful songs, as yet untouched by the shadow of death.
- Spotifriday #20 Side I: This Week on DiS as a playlist
- Watch: Nirvana - 'School' live at Reading '92
- Muse take lip-syncing to new levels, surpass Nirvana
- Win! A Guitar Hero bundle in our giveaway!
- Party Like It's 1992: Nirvana and Cobain Guitar Hero 'feud' starts to make even less sense
- Nirvana Reading DVD gets front cover and UK release date
- Drowned in Reading Festival: A Greatest Hits Mixtape
- Nirvana's Bleach to get 20th anniversary reissue
More Nirvana
-
Nirvana - Sliver: The Best of the Box
-
Dave Grohl: "One of the biggest jerks..."
-
Drugs. Music. Let's talk.
"Tony" was in fact
a member of 90s (hugely under-rated) band Bivouac. He was also on stage with Nirvana at the 91 festival with "God is Gay" scrawled on his chest.
Bleach
There's video footage of the live set that's just been released with the reissue of Bleach. They should release that. Nice review, by the way.
Negative Bleach
"This isn’t the stuff of myth or legend..."
I don't know about that. For me it's personally not, but for a younger generation who might stumble on to this in their early early teens and discovering this performance might regard this as something legendary.
really?
I had no idea that was Anthony from Bivouac up there! He seemed to do it a lot, I found a video of them live at leeds in 1991 and he's onstage there, he also was onstage for the first foo fighters reading show. The Biv's were bloody brilliant, shame nirvana didn't take them out on tour with them.
1991 was a better gig definitely it would seem, only seen amateur footage of it but it had a lot more energy and no hang ups, I was at 92 just for the day and I only have a bootleg line-up t-shirt and L7's autographs to prove it :D
Yeah, I guess it's all subjective
But I was talking about in the greater scheme of Nirvana gigs, and I suppose an awful lot has been written and said about this gig and if felt a lot more 'normal' than I'd maybe expected. I suppose I'm contrasting with Unplugged, which does feel overtly 'special' and one off and has a kind of end of days thing to it. This is good, and I'm sure a lot of people will get a lot from it.
Bivouac were excellent
now thats a blast from the past!
I'm sure a lot of people who trawl this site were at this show, I was
and it was the end of the pretty long, cold and wet day... It certainly didn't feel legendary at the time. It felt uncomfortable. Mudhoney had mud thrown at 'em, Nick Cave didn't (after John Peel - bless him - suggested it might not go down well). Pavement, the Melvins and the Screaming Trees were all great. Mudhoney were too of course. The whole day was billed as being full of artists chosen by Nirvana/Kurt. But personally speaking... it was a slight anti-climx. I've watched the DVD and whilst it has it's moments, KC is on auto-pilot for 50-75% of the performance.
Tony the dancer performed the year before as well and that show DID feel legendary. Much better set, a nicer day with an equally amazing line up and personally the 1st time I heard SLTS.. one of those moments when you turn to a stranger and go 'Did you just hear that song..?!! F*** me that was good!'. I mean folks KNEW N***** were special pre their performance at Reading in 1991... Christ a lot happened in a year to that band/man. My tuppence. Ta.
I was too and I agree
I was there the year before in 1991, in the pit, and that was incredible. Without any rose tinted spectacles one of the best of my many Reading experiences (and let's not forget Mudhoney in the same main stage slot the year before that).
To be honest my abiding memory of the headline show was being quite far back and a kid with glasses asking if he could sit on my shoulders to see. I duly obliged and did one of my only good-gig turns. Can't really much of the set and agreed it didn't feel super special at the time but hindsight etc. I'll still get the DVD though.
I was there too
and was not that that impressed, particularly after seeing Mudhoney and L7 earlier in the day. One thing I do regret however is leaving Nirvana's set halfway through to pull an Irish girl who'd been staying in the next tent to me. The things you do when you're young, eh...
I asked my wife, who was there as well, if she thought it was a
'legendary' show - no, she thought L7 were better.... Gotten me thinking, where does all this 'legendary' show stuff come from? Journos with agendas:)? It certainly, was their 'last' UK show. It's undoubtedly a 'notable' show maybe even 'infamous'.. but legendary? Nah I think not. to me it smacks of another N******* myth...
The legend was created by Kurt's death
and little else. The whole grunge phenomenon was on its last legs at the time, and while there's no denying the cultural impact Nirvana had, whether it would have been on the same level or magnitude is highly debatable, and of course impossible to say.
good,
if i were to ever film a concert i would keep my camera on the band away from the crowd.


Nirvana
In Photos: Monotonix @ Hector's House, Brighton
In Photos: The Specials @ Hammersmith Apollo, London
In Photos: Camden Crawl Launch Event @ The Blues Kitchen, London
In Photos: La Roux @ Shepherds Bush Empire, London
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article