Sign In:
Login with Facebook
54707
Type: Album Release date: 02/11/2009
Your Rating:

Hindsight reveals a certain irony to the fact that, as a debut album, 1989’s Bleach effectively shared some common traits with Pearl Jam’s perpetually misappropriated Ten. Not on the surface, of course - musically, they could scarcely be more different - but both records are ultimately frustrated by a certain naivety: where Ten’s self-consciously anthemic stadium karaoke acts as a glorified placeholder for a band not yet having worked out precisely what it is they want to achieve, Bleach’s strangulated snarl is the sound of Kurt Cobain having a pretty clear idea as to his long-term aspirations, but as yet lacking the full toolkit for putting it all together.

That said, Nirvana’s inaugural effort never really felt like the paradigm of back catalogue sore thumbs that Ten would eventually prove to be. The queues snaking back towards Bleach on the strength of Nevermind and In Utero would encounter the odd balmy waft of familiarity in tracks like ‘School’ - its excoriating one-finger riff housing the core DNA that would shortly evolve into career classics like ‘Breed’ - and the incongruously winsome, quasi-freakbeat jangle of ‘About A Girl’, later resurrected to some extent (albeit in heavily soiled form) on ‘Rape Me’.

The sections of Bleach that do sit somewhat uncomfortably within the wider Nirvana canon, though, concern two songwriting styles that Cobain thereafter more or less jettisoned for good. Gristly, artificially elongated Frankenstein’s monster jams (later to provide much of the second half bulk on compilation oddity Incesticide) represent one extreme, and while neither ‘Paper Cuts’ nor ‘Sifting’ are as stodgily impenetrable as Incesticide’s ‘Aero Zeppelin’ or ‘Big Long Now’, both sink like steel-toed boots amongst Bleach’s lighter, more colourful flotsam and jetsam.

By way of counter-example, ‘Swap Meet’ and ‘Scoff’ are both infinitely more prismatic, shot through with that trickily tongue-in-cheek Cobain wryness that was arguably one of his most overlooked virtues as a songwriter. However, these tracks begin the drift toward Bleach’s other polar extreme: the worryingly lightweight two-chord shrug of ‘Floyd The Barber’, or the, er, worryingly lightweight two-chord shrug of ‘Big Cheese’. Far more than the aforementioned knuckle-dragging plodders, it’s actually this smattering of half-formed afterthoughts that make Bleach a faintly irritating album to wade through in one sitting.

Inevitably, the record only really hits its stride on the middle ground - those places where ‘Blew’s implausibly down-tuned snarl meets ‘School’ and its drooling half-brother ‘Negative Creep’, all three tormented by the effortlessly cocksure ‘Love Buzz’. In fact the presence of the latter cover, brilliant though it is, somehow vies with Jack Endino’s production for the dubious honour of doing the remainder of Bleach the fewest favours: quite why Endino felt the need to push Chad Channing’s oddly anaemic drumming quite so high in the mix isn’t immediately clear, and it doesn’t seem as though the levels have been tweaked significantly (if at all) for this anniversary re-release.

What we do get as a bonus, though, is an Endino-remixed Live At Pine Street Theatre bolt-on. Recorded on Feb 9, 1990 in Portland, it showcases six Bleach standards (only Negative Creep is conspicuous by its absence) alongside ‘Dive’, ‘Spank Thru’, ‘Molly’s Lips’, ‘Sappy’ and ‘Been A Son’. Of these, ‘Dive’ is already the fully-formed monster - indeed, oft-overlooked career highlight - it emerged as on Incesticide, while ‘Been A Son’ and ‘Molly’s Lips’ chug along with all the buoyant disposability that marks them out as welcome light relief on the same album. Crucially, it’s a deftly-recorded live set that achieves remarkable clarity without sacrificing one iota of wallop. It doesn’t boast nearly as rich a setlist as the new Live At Reading behemoth, though, so the jury remains out on whether it fully justifies picking up a second copy of Bleach.

Ironically, this package was always going to be one for the completists, but those who’ll actually get the most from Bleach are still the Nevermind fans left feeling alienated by the gnarled triumph that was In Utero. Cobain’s debut offering is perhaps best viewed as the author showing his working: listened to now, it’s clearly awash with caustic, malformed clues as to how Nirvana made that final giant leap from mainstream success to their swansong - and easily their greatest - studio recording ever.

You've forgotten to close the italics after 'Live At Pine Street Theatre'

Good review though. I love this album.

Incorrect

A DiS reviewer giving Bleach only 7/10? I hear the cosmos omitting a rip-roaring fart squeal in disgust. No way can the various paragraphs of inevitably humourless "Now, let me put this into perspective for you" style post-degree chin-stoking be anything less than an abomination. I won't read a word of it. Shame on you, you nad-less fool.

i never liked this record

Nevermind >>> In Utero >>>> Live at the Wishkah >>>>>> Unplugged >>>>>> Insesticide >>>>>>>> Bleach

It would probably get 6 if it wasn't for the live add-on.

In Utero knocks it into a hatted cock at literally every turn, and there's little point in discussing reissues if we don't filter them through some degree of perspective/hindsight.

Bleach is a scruffy pup - a very lovable album, but by no means a truly great one.

You've got the first two in the wrong order. ;)

Apart from that - and the fact that Wishkah doesn't really feel like it should count - I largely agree.

Nevermind wishes it was In Utero. And if it doesn't, it should.

I like that you namecheck my two favourites from Incesticide together - Big Long Now and Aero Zeppelin :)

Fat compression

Is the reason the drums are higher in the mix. But some treble has been rolled off the splash of the cymbals.

You're a cock,

you're a cock, you're a cock.

That comment

made me frightened.

^ what he said

In Utero is the where Nivana is at.

True though, I'm afraid

Not one for audiophiles.

This is possibly

the most ill-informed review I have ever read, and not even speaking from personal bias. 'About a Girl' comparable to 'Rape Me'? Are you mad? They're not remotely similar - if anything the rhythm of RM is reminiscent to Smells Like Teen Spirit, but that's as far as the likeness goes. And Floyd The Barber? Lightweight? Are you deaf as well as mad? And two-chord? What about all the other chords in it? What about the middle 8?

I could go on but it's making me angry.

Have you ever seen a band play before?
Have you ever even seen a musical instrument?
Did you even listen to the album, or just look at the pictures and the sleeve then throw it all in the bin when you realised it didn't have the man from the Foo Fighters playing on it?
And how old were you when Bleach came out anyway? 2?

ha ha ha ha

not that there's any reason you should know Mr Powell's bio, but you're WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY off the mark here.

This is possibly

the best comment ever.

And no, I've never done any of those things. Busted!

I like in depth reviews

and this is ok on that front but it seems a bit like reading Dickins or something. Really like trawling through mud. Here's a cumbersome example: "incongruously winsome, quasi-freakbeat jangle" when discribing About a Girl.

Don't agree with all of it but only skimmed read the end and generally, you're not emant to agree with reviews so much as appriciate what they're trying to say.

Basically it's s'lright

kthxbye

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon