Sign In:
54373
Type: Album Release date: 19/10/2009
Your Rating:

Kings of Convenience are the Daft Punk of acoustic music. When Daft Punk’s epic Human After All came out after a five year wait the deceptively simplistic techno loops had just about everybody confused – how did it take seven years? At five years since their last LP, Kings of Convenience are just as prolific, and their minimal approach is just as deceptive. How did it take five years to come up with Declaration of Dependence? The question answers itself with each new listen, as tiny details and methodically charted rhythms reveal themselves.

The set opens with the uncomplicated ’24-25’, a sparse exercise in Simon and Garfunkelisms draped in gorgeous fingerpicked patterns. Paul'n'Art comparisons are often fired at the duo, but it’s a smart reference, not mere aping, an acknowledgement that their music has a huge nostalgic rush in its veins; by channelling that which is almost the very sound of nostalgia itself – wistful longing for lost summers, loves or friends the band capture exactly the mood the lyrics call for. The blueprint set down by ’24-25’ is one that serves the band for the rest of the album – as it has on all of their previous work.

Their rigid approach might seem strange considering Erlend Øye’s well documented musical travels. Indeed, his part as one-half of Kings of Convenience is almost eclipsed by his endeavours in electronic music – his DJ Kicks disc is to my ears the best thing he has done – something that you might have thought could crossover into Kings of Convenience at some point. That it hasn’t so far suggests that the duo’s dogmatic stylistic approach is unwavering for a reason.

‘My Ship is Not Pretty’ is the furthest away from the shoreline of comfort that they get, and it’s a shame, because it’s also the strongest track on the album, Eirik Bøe anxiously sings ‘The telegraph gave us hope/ Before was the silence and the panic it brought / The sky was the blackest sheet / We drew lines upon it, so our thoughts could meet’. It’s not the standard nostalgic fare that Kings of Convenience have perfected over the years. It’s tinged with darkness and depth - the space and sparse guitar recalls the way Scott Walker evolved his chamber pop into an entirely different beast – and to hear the duo deconstruct the style that they have honed so perfectly is exciting; that it is an anomaly on the album is frustrating.

If ‘My Ship’s Not Pretty’ closed side A then it’s possible Kings of Convenience could have stretched their legs over Side B into new territory, or torn down their comfort zone as many bands have done to rousing success over the past decade (Modest Mouse on Moon Vs Antartica or Wilco’s modern classic Yankee Hotel Foxtrot) but the band bottle it and the promise of ‘My Ship’s Not Pretty’ is proved to be a one-off as the band make hard work of pretty but unremarkable songs on a punishing latter third of the album – the duo aim for big sentiment on tracks such as ‘Freedom and its Owner’ and ‘Scars on Land’ but fall short as the album plods to a disappointing close.

Some of the disappointment with the latter half is the fault of such an enjoyable start to the album. The album serves as a classic case of frontloading and one gets a sense that the first six songs would have made a better standalone EP, buying the band yet more time to craft something a little more interesting. Three albums in, and after almost ten years the band’s creative flow seems to have pooled – and with the limited nature of acoustic music the song itself is often not enough. If Kings of Convenience could find a way of presenting their music like late-period Elliot Smith or Wilco at their best the duo could be canonised with artists such as Scott Walker or their beloved Simon and Garfunkel. As it is they are danger of losing their charm to complacency.

review

I'm not sure about the review because describing just two songs, another two mark as sentimental and let the rest of the album (with 13 songs) untouched as uninteresting and not worth of writing somethings seems to me not very professional and fulfilling the demands of an 'advanced' DiS reader. After many important points of KoC career isn't this review enough and is more on its halfway than the album it describes. sorry.

meh

this review is spot on; Riot on an Empty Street suffered the same disappointing latter third and what I've heard of this seems to be even less varied. What difference would a list of song titles make?

I find it pretty accurate tho

the review, I mean. I found this album a bit boring. Sure, it starts off ok - but then it goes on and on and on and on and on the same way.

let's not start discrediting the first two albums..

come on people you need to go back and listen to "Riot" again if you think it trailed off in the latter half. That album had "I'd rather dance with you" "Gold in the air of Summer" and "live long" in it's latter half some of the best songs on the album. Both "Quiet is the new loud" and "Riot on an empty street" are classics. The best and most memorable of this type of genre. I can't tell you how excited I was to finally get my hands on a new album this week. The review is right that the album starts off really strong. The first 4 songs are fantastic. I'm only two listens in but it does seem as though the latter half isn't as memorable though I think it's too early to make the call. The band decided to strip it down really minimal on a majority of tracks and i'm confident the song's melodies will grow on subsequent listens. Even if it does end up being only "the weakest out of the 3" I would still take that over no KOC album at all.

what I ment

I don't think that reviewer should describe every single song, but there are many nice and well-written ideas that could be mentioned.
like "I've got no cards to play, that's why, I've got nothing to say, tonight" discussing some frustration of the smallness of his words.
or “I see you building the castle with one hand, while tearing down another with the other” - that's what people do very often, trying to get something and breaking it in the same time. and I think it's a nice metaphor
or simple “So we meet again after several years, Several years of separation” what symbolizes a big part of this album.
and there could be many quotations that I could mention. I would be silly to put everything into one review, but talking about two songs when you have a bunch of emotions & topic seems to me deficient

i find it strange

this album has been reviewed without a single mention of "Mrs. Cold"

.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon