- Artists:
- The Twang »
- Label:
- B-Unique »
It's Jewellery Quarter, by The Twang. They’re well lairy, right? Like Oasis, yar? Like Ocean Colour Scene, mmm-hmm? Didn't they try to date-rape the NME once? Can I fathom opinion enough to write a review of them? Can I?
Wait: HELLO TWANG FANS. PLEASE DO CALL ME A POOR EXCUSE FOR A HUMAN BEING, PURELY BECAUSE I’M NOT ECHOING YOUR OPINIONS. I OUGHT TO BE ASHAMED OF MYSELF. Wait again: I AM LISTENING TO THIS ALBUM BECAUSE I'M GENUINELY CURIOUS. I just wrote this in capitals in case you skipped to the end only to skip back to the start again, which you did, right?
I'm going to start with some opinion on ‘Answer My Call' (my album highlight), which is pretty alright actually. You heard, I said 'alright'! A track by The Twang just got called 'alright' by a writer on DiS. But hold on, that's not the end of the review. 'Alright' is pretty much the worst that could happen. It means passable, not bad, ok, acceptable, tolerable... Keep saying those words of mediocrity and you'll succumb to a life of horrible, purposeless apathy. The fact that this album isn't wank is actually the opposite of relieving. What is the fucking point?
“I know I'll be alright/if you set me free” is a choice cut from opening track 'Took The Fun'. Listen up: I don't write in clichés and I hate people that do. There's a cowbell thrown in here out of sheer desperation to make the track sound interesting. There seems to be some sort of secret desire (hell!) to turn it into a steel-drum/panpipe extravaganza. To mask its pure greyness, perhaps?
Pre-amble #2: I like music. I want to be challenged. I crave that want-to-hear-it-again nag, the one that incessantly hammers at my ear on the fade-out so much that I end up hating it. The ponderings: "How did they write this?"/"Gosh, this is stark"/"Wow, I wish I could do that". Yeah, it IS about that. It absolutely is about me wanting to feel inferior. Is that perverse?
Or the alternative: Isn't this what everyone wants out of life, let alone music? Perhaps with less of the not-so-secret desire to feel inferior. More importantly, who can possibly want the only lingering question to be whether a person has written an LP in anything other than jest?
And so we continue, to 'Barney Rubble'. It's pure mundanity. The lyrics whinge about what their protagonist should've done. WELL WHY DIDN'T HE JUST GO AND BLOODY WELL DO IT? Easy enough question, really. Lyric example: “It's this repetitive nonsense that brings her down”. Isn't that ironic.
Quick-and-necessary-mention-of-the-music-itself 1/1: there are three notes repeated on the bass, a note-ambit of about five semitones in the vocals, a completely predictable verse-chorus structure and the odd peppering of cod-gospel thirds, but that's kind of it. Can I tell you anything about what they make me feel? No. Can I say I have any sort of reaction to them? Again, no.
“The really pointless stuff about life, like rain. Oh hold on, shall we write a song and use it as pathetic fallacy? Yeah?” I'd like to imagine Phil Etheridge, frontman of The Twang, having this conversation with himself. If it was conscious, I'd maybe even garner a tiny spot of interest.
'Put It On The Dancefloor' is as superfluous as everything apart from two bars picked at random from the album. Actually, it's as superfluous as those too. The album is essentially a two-note non-melody stuck on repeat.
“When I said I liked you/I really meant it” - a lyric taken from 'Encouraging Sign'. It also serves as a sample of why this album is like listening to someone you've bumped into unexpectedly, that friend-of-a-friend's friend who can liquidise even the most interesting person into reconstituted soup.
Back to 'album highlight' (yup, really) ‘Answer My Call’ - there’s trumpets and everything. It's the equivalent of listening to yourself on a C-90 talking French in a Brummie accent unironically. And again, I can offer nothing more than a recollection of my observations. Why? Because I get absolutely no further in the process of extracting meaning from it even on a second-try.
I'm sporadically throwing awful analogies into this review in the hope that they make you cringe. Especially if you're a fan of The Twang and are already turning a shade of red-to-a-bull in response to my superiorised warblings. I want you, the reader, to partake in a new thought process; I want you experience two seconds whereby you wonder “what do those words mean?”. Patronising, me? Never. I don't even mean it like that. What I mean is this: Don't you want to think? Don't you enjoy thinking? Or do you instead prefer listening to background whining? Are you happy to settle for this? Do you not even consider the alternative?
WOAH. MUST CALM DOWN. Think of the ocean.
Look, there's those of you reading this 'cause you've found it via Google. There's also some of you here that probably have Google Alerts switched on 'cause you're that fanatical about this band. Presumably there's some DiSers here just looking for a piss-take. The latter was never going to be the case – I came into this open-minded. Just reiterating that from earlier, remember? Truth is that I've not heard the debut album and didn't really know too much about this band. I knew they'd been hyped but had no idea why. I wanted to find out more. Part as expectant-sadist, part out of genuine curiosity.
Was it worth it? Yes, if this inspires anyone to listen to something better than this. Music as escapism is one thing but you might as well watch your pet slug try to form a crop circle in Central Park if you want to be this uninspired.
I could go on and reference every single track, asking myself why The Twang's Jewellery Quarter is enticing to a single soul, but I'd just repeat and rehash and rejig over and over and over. I'd get bored and a significant proportion of you guys would leave. And therein lies yet another parallel.
Closer: this isn't much a music review at all, it's more me trying to change the world. Yes, the world! The music-listening world. I'm right/you're right. If you think you're right, you aren't; if you can justify you're right, you are. You need a reason to be right. Or a reason to be wrong. Am I the more-reclusive Hitler of the music world? Possibly.
Closer #2: these aren't the songs of an inarticulate brute, instead far from it. The points come across in lucid form, it's just that there's absolutely no purpose to them. Back into my mirror-laden hole I crawl...
- Spotifriday #24: This Week on DiS as a Playlist
- This Week's Singles: 12/10/2009
- The Twang - Jewellery Quarter
- The Twang - Jewellery Quarter
- Chart Round-Up: brought to you by ACME
- Twang: McClaren a 'twat'
- Xfm announces 'Best New Album' prize shortlist
- Chart round-up: just one falsetto, give it to me...
whilst I'm pretty sure this album isn't very good
This is very poor review, and quite befitting of a site where most of the positive reviews of albums involve quite carefully written and thought out opinion pieces, and negative reviews are juvenile, humourless and pointless.
too awkwardly self-conscious
and eager to justify/defend an opinion that's pretty much going to be the party line on here.
the twang are almost certainly a music industry experiment to see what happens if the desperate older band with futile dreams of 'making it' actually get their wish granted. to their credit, they probably know they only have a limited shelf-life so they seem to be living the dream while they can.
they were always going to be the sacrifice for harvest this time around though.
Hello.
@oenso - yep, of course it's the party line from DiS regulars, but not from search-traffic. Hence my purpose.
@johnwiddop - I clarified that humour wasn't what I was going for.
What I should've done was ended with a link to a Spotify playlist of music I love, such as this one: http://open.spotify.com/user/natalieshaw/playlist/7kly6CeR4ENa3LZb0btXAD
"Date rape the nme"...
actuLOL.
No seriously, still laughing at that.
10/10
The Twang are awful
What else did anyone honestly expect Natalie to say?
Did Jeremy Kyle write this?
What with all the capitals and self-importance.
I'm a massive douchebag
check me out.
ALSO
that wasn't meant ironically. i, alexander velky am a douchebag and i once kissed every member of the twank.
There is a song on this album
called 'Barney Rubble'.
Jesus.
What a poor and dislikable review. No-one likes the Twang here anyway (me included), so the review is just giving the majority of the readers what they want. But then the reviewer addresses 'Twang fans' (as if there are any on here) and says something totally brave IN CAPITALS. Wow... that's so... brave, right?!
Jeez
Who cares, really?
Can't argue with the general opinion..
but CHRIST, what a painful review to read. HIGH HORSE etc.
i was going to post
to pan the poor quality of this review, but to be honest I'm just starting to feel a bit sorry for the writer.
Gave up reading after three paragraphs...
That's one of the worst reviews I've ever had the (dis)pleasure to read, maybe perhaps ever. Just plodded about with self importance and was generally quite boring.
Look at Dom's excellent review of the latest Enemy album to see how these kind of reviews can be written.
You can definitely spare me your pity.
This review really wasn't targeted at members of DiS, more those who aren't signed up and have come to the site via search. Which is a significant proportion, I'm sure.
"No-one likes the Twang here anyway" - you'd have thought, but then don't forget that one of DiS' most popular posts was photos of Lady GaGa (right, Sean? or something like that?).
It's not your normal template for a review, no, but hell there's the close button if you don't like it. And comparing reviews to each other is kind of a ridiculous concept. Although that Enemy review was great. But who wants the same thing every time?
The CAPS thing is more than self-explanatory. And the repeated reference to a high horse or whatever, isn't every opinion based on one of those, hmm?
This is actually the first music review I've written where I felt this complete apathy, and let's say it's been a long, long time coming.
There's probably lots more to say here but the defence is in the piece itself. You know, that feels of defence that kicks in when you feel yourself becoming completely indifferent to some sort of art-form you've been presented with. It's all pretty much explained in the review.
The last sentence has a typo. Whatever.
it's a sad thing that these days
America is so much better than the UK not only in terms of music but also music criticism. Say what you will about Pitchfork, there's no way this review would have got anywhere near that site.
I don't know
You've seen the Pitchfork review of Get Born by Jet right?
I dunno
Pitchfork has it's share of smug, pointless reviews, although it is much much better than it used to be. DiS definitely needs some quality-control. I can't be the only person that only really uses this site for the boards now.
I'd be surprised if there were any Twang fans left to bother finding it via Google. I don't care if DiS wants to slate them (who isn't?). This review just flows so badly and is hard to read. The last couple of paragraphs are excruciating.
it's not so much the smugness
well, actually, it is, it's just how badly written the whole thing is. Pitchfork reviews may be very often self-important, and trip over themselves in an attempt to show just how clever they are, but they at least give the impression of being written by vaguely competent writers. This Twang review is just plain bad.
This album was going to get a bad review
But there was no need for a poorly written quipless incoherent rant. Isn't it odd the amount of times "I" features in this review? It seems to be mostly about the writer.
p4k'd
"The Twang, Jewelry Quarter
“I know I'll be alright/if you set me free” is a steel-drum/panpipe extravaganza. It's pure. There are three notes and the odd peppering of cod-gospel thirds.
Phil Etheridge, frontman of The Twang, is essentially a two-note non-melody stuck on repeat. This album is like listening to that friend-of-a-friend's friend who can liquidise trumpets.
It's the equivalent of a C-90 sporadically throwing a new thought process; I want you experience two seconds, whereby you think of the ocean.
Truth is that I wanted to find out more. Part as expectant-sadist, part out of genuine curiosity. Was it worth it? Yes, this inspires anyone to form a crop circle in Central Park and is enticing to a single soul over and over and over.
This is trying to change the music-listening world. You need the more-reclusive lucid form, it's mirror-laden...
The Twang 9.2"
Or Nathan Barley?
(Having been told 'The Twang are not cool')
I think
this is an amazing review, perfectly encapsulates the head-melting, common sense obliterating emptiness and frustration i feel when presented with a band like The Twang.
Hmm not sure about the review,
but the sentiment is spot on.
I mean i fully expect the album to be a non-challenging air vacumm. I just can't imagine anyone with any interest in anything of a higher art form than say...The Daily Sports' political cartoonist finding anything interesting in it.
honestly before this review
i had completly forgotten the twang had even existed.
3
2
1
and their gone again
I like how you're not arguing against it being juvenile and pointless
as for it not intended to be humour, are you serious about "Am I the more reclusive Hitler of the music scene?"
I heard this album today. Dreadful stuff.
This is the kind of review
that gives this website a bad name
Yes, I'm serious.
I just killed Jon McClure, underground.
"This is the kind of review
that gives this website a bad name"
^^^^^^truesay
some on DiS, have a bit of pride in what you produce.
TOTALLY ^t^h^i^s
how much dis content is designed to attract other demographics? it must be a pretty awkward thing to balance but i dont think its that relevant here. i mean, i can imagine >9000 hits on a photo of ladio gaga but not people spoiling for a fight / seeking enlightenment cos another snobby music website slated their beloved twang, especially when it's written like this. in that respect i guess its a bit flawed, but that doesn't detract from it being a well written article from someone who actually gives a shit. and also, pitchfork do this faux-concept review style ALL THE TIME, and imo are way less articulate about it.
iminafuckingfoulmoodtodayyyy
except
that it's really badly written
war and peace?
JUST LOOKING AT THIS REVIEW GIVES ME A FUCKING HEADACHE! reads like natalie wishes she wrote for pitchfork but ain't got the chops. hence, we find her here.
literally nobody in the world cares about The Twang
LITERALLY NOBODY
even the people who liked the first album don't care anymore. If this is some grand scheme to get rabid ad clicking Twang arseholes to this website then you guys really don't have a clue. You might want to give something ubiquitously internet like Animal Collective a shit review though, that'll heat the traffic right up
If you can't have faith in YOUR OWN opinion...
...then whose opinion are you going to bloody well have faith in?
In defence of the reviewer!
It can be one of the hardest things in the world to write about an album that doesnt inspire you. I'm sure a blow by blow account of the albums tracks would have been acceptable but this review conveys a feeling of utter dispair.
I remember when The Twang got signed. There was a lot of jealousy in Birmingham at the time largely due to the fact that there were far better bands around and that The Twang didnt really endear themselves to other bands in Birmingham (eg leaving their stuff onstage after theyd played, spitting onstage,wrecking gear).
Seeing them in interviews since it seems that they are genuinely thankful for the praise that they have recieved though!
It must be shit for them to be slated in every review for this album. Even NME called it dogshit!
Pitchfork is rubbish.
A line from one of their very recent reviews:
'Taking the longview, SDRE seem even less of their time than they were in the mid-90s, positioned between the more stone-faced acolytes of Fugazi and the branches of Jade Tree that went mathletic or simply stuffed as many proper nouns as possible into radio-intended pop-punk (see: songs called "Anne Arbour"). '
Long sentence, name-checking, pointless words like 'mathletic', et cetera.
How is this tedious stuff any better than a review which, although it jumps around a bit, is at least an honest, emotional response? Seriously? Where is its merit? Why is it good? I'm sick of reading music reviews which are full of adjectives. I just want to know how people feel about what they're listening to. More reviews like Natalie's, please.
wi think its ok
listenable, some songs are even quite good, dont think they deserve such a negative review



The Twang
"More bands should split up" - Brett Anderson opens up to DiS about the return of Suede
Drowned in Manchester #15 – May 2013
armchair dancefloor 39: Mount Kimbie interview, Bobby Browser, Powell, Move D, Leon Vynehall...
DiS meets John Lydon - Part 1: The Man
DiS Does Singles 20.05.13: Paramore, Laura Marling, The Replacements
DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article