Sign In:
42971
Type: Album Release date: 13/10/2008
Your Rating:

A mere five months on and we've got album number two from Cardiff's Los Campesinos! in our hands and ears. But We Are Beautiful... isn't regurgitated remains, studio-floor leftovers or a swerve in a different direction - instead, it's the sound of a band with a shedload of energy and ideas getting that vital, cathartic release before fatigue sets in.

And whereas many bands are chastised for repetition, you can't ever imagine wanting Los Campesinos! to veer away from their particular sonic furrow. So while it _is_ more of the same, when that same is such an unpretentious joy to listen to it's churlish to complain. That's not to say it's perfect though: one or two tracks are slightly stretched beyond their natural life, and 'Between An Erupting Earth And An Exploding Sky' seems like 76 seconds of swirly sounds to bump the record up to ten tracks. But these are minor quibbles.

We Are Beautiful... certainly hits the ground running - sprinting, actually, at an Olympic pace with 'Ways To Make It Through The Wall'. Here, lyrics such as "I think it's fair to say that I chose hopelessness / And inflicted it on the rest of us / But at least I've come to terms with my mortality" revisit the familiar themes of youth and youthful despondency of the first album, and this continues in 'Miserabilia': "Shout at the world because the world doesn't love you / Love yourself because you know that you'll have to".

Those still bewitched by 'You! Me! Dancing!' will fall head over heels for the title track, despite it sulking in the corner like a jilted sister. And in "Absence makes the heart grow fonder / Fondness makes the absence longer" and "You said he had his teeth fixed / I'm gonna break them", it contains two of the best couplets you'll hear this year. And there's also a wonderful terrace chant, making fine use of the 'F' word.

Central to this record is 'You'll Need Those Fingers For Crossing', the longest track here at just over five minutes. It's a song that swells with yearning and talks of "A soft porn version of the end of the world"; musically, it's proof that it _is_ possible for a band to grow and develop in the space of five months. The same goes for the tender 'Heart Swells/Pacific Daylight Time'.

So where does that leave us? Well, whack both LC! albums together and, though you've got barely an hour of music, it's still a better hour than most bands manage during the first couple of years of their existence. Give them another six months in the studio and they'll probably come up with the ultimate indie-pop song to conquer the world's dancefloors - but, for now, this is certainly more than acceptable.

"unpretentious"

...

i think 7/10 is selling them short.

8/10 as its more of the same (awesome stuff)

Is this an album review or

songmeanings.net?

shit lyric

"more than acceptable"

No need to crack out the hyperbole then.

IMO, this is a better album: in terms of lyrics, musicianship and sound. I think it deserves a better if not equal mark to the original.

its lame and i shouldnt do it

but part of me thinks this got a seven just because its quite short and has come out so soon after hony. it does exactly what that album did except better.

Am i the only one who is completely underwhelmed by this record?

Don't get me wrong i love Los Camp!, they were probably my Reading highlight this year. However, this record is average. It sounds like a B-sides collection. There is no progression from the first EP and LP and bar a couple of songs (the splendid title track, for example) it is largely forgettable. However, as it is Los Camp! it IS a lot more listenable than most of the tripe out there!

I agree

they reaaally needed to wait longer before recording more stuff.

I think 7/10

is a pretty fair summing up. I've listened to it a fair bit now and I like it but I don't love it (Whereas I most certainly DO love Hold on Now Youngster). I think that if this were a debut album, we might feel slightly (only very slightly, mind) short-changed. Though I guess that's perhaps why they've been distancing themselves from calling it an album. I'm still glad they've done this.

Not sure whether it is

just more of the same... the 'sound' is different, the relationship between gareth's and alek's vocals is different and the content is completely different.

Too much

focus on the lyrics for my liking.

It's not an album.

it is though isnt it

oh jesus christ stop it

seriously

Hilar that NME 9/10'ed WAB,WAD

and DiS 7'ed it.
Whereas, it was the other way around for HONY,

Me too.

ENeMy

Actually, I think DiS have give a more down to earth review than the NME.

its not actually proper 2nd album is it doh

i think its more mature, less poppy and not quite! as good

8/10

and its not even their follow up

I'm a disgustingl big lc! fan

and I agree wholeheartedly with JontyBriggs.
Still more spectacular than a lot of other stuff floating around.

As good as the old but more mature

Heart Swells/ Pacific Daylight surprised me.

bloody good mean

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon