Sign In:

Burial favourite for Mercury Music Prize

Formerly enigmatic dubstep producer Burial is now clear favourite to scoop the Mercury Music Prize, decided tomorrow at London's Grosvenor House.

Burial, AKA William Bevan, is now favourite with Stan James (5/4), Ladbrokes (8/13), and William Hill (4/7) for last year's Untrue.

Elbow are second favourites for The Seldom Seen Kid with odds ranging from 2/1 at Stan James to 6/1 with William Hill, whilst Radiohead's In Rainbows follows close behind at Stan James (5/1), Ladbrokes (7/1) and William Hill (6/1).

Other contenders for the £20,000 prize include Estelle, Neon Neon and folk-songstress Laura Marling.

Follow live coverage of the event from the BBC here: bbc.co.uk/mercurys**

_DiScuss: who's your money on? Who do you think will win DiS' alternative award, the Pluto prize (vote here), which is also announced tomorrow? _

i hope he doesn't

No comment.

I forgot this was happening

Burial will no doubt win as he is ace.

it's very-very close

Currently only 20 votes between first and fifth!

oh?

intriguing

it's been close since day one.

at more than one point there were two albums tied for the lead.

I'm hopping for a one two double win for the bass crowd

Burial for the Mercury

&

The Bug for the Pluto

Marling for Mercury, MIA for Pluto

would be nice...

^This, for me too

Hoping Elbow win

as they deserve it for having a fourth fantastic album in a row.

Radiohead, Burial, Laura Marling, BSP, they'd all be good too.

MIA should have been shortlisted though

MIA

is a good shout

probably

because so many of them are so average. fuck buttons got my vote but even that's hardly a classic

^

Rubbish, plenty of great albums there.

i'll bet

that there's not one album on the list that people are still goin to be listening to in three years time. as i said, maybe fuck buttons

That's rubbish.

Have you heard all twelve? Didn't think so.

Besides, who cares if they're being listened to in three years' time? I rarely listen to albums I consider classics from three years ago - I listen to what's new, mostly, as do many people who genuinely love their music.

As a snapshot of excellent albums from the period July 2007-July 2008, the Pluto 12 plus the Mercury 12 = a pretty fine 24 indeed.

oh 'most people

who genuinely love their music only listen to new music'? fuck off! no wonder so many people around here express daft opinions like 'the beatles were shit'..i listen to tons of new music (i'd say about 3 hours of new music a day) AND i listen to classics.
just cos you're passionate about music doesn't mean you shouldn't have standards, in fact it should make you more demanding about what's truly great and what's merely good. but then again, you are the guy who saw fit to award 'weekend in the city' a 9 rating.
for the record, i own 7 of the albums and i've heard enough material from the other ones to decide that they're not worth my hard-earned.

MIA?

If nothing else that'll be an album to listen to to in three years, five years, ten years time. PJ Harvey, Portishead and Robert Wyatt are all good on that list too.

Seven from twelve? So you're...

...only just over 50 per cent qualified to state what you did above? Well done. And where do I say 'only new music'? Rarely was the word I used, and I'd imagine that most people who frequently visit DiS for news on current artists breakthrough and mainstream listen to those acts much more than they do, say, the Beatles, Led Zep, Pink Floyd, Wire, Public Enemy, etc.

I own many a 'classic' album - whatever you mean by classic (presumably you're referring to albums that critics too old to remember the last time they went to a gig that wasn't seated consider genre- and era-defining documents and artifacts? Fuck them, fucking dinosaurs) - but rarely turn to them when there's such a brilliant stream of new music coming out week in, week out. It only takes a little time to turn over some stones and discover something magic, something to rate alongside these perceived 'classics', which are only 'classics' today because nobody has had the balls to properly stand up for records released since the birth and death of punk. To move the goalposts. To stick two up to John Lydon and tell him 'Bollocks' is bollocks, and piss on the graves of Harrison and Lennon spelling 'only two songs off the white album are any good, you self-absorbed self-aggrandizing dead twats' as they go.

I HATE the notion of classic albums, given the wholly subjective nature of the absorption and assessment of art - unless you're analyzing the process over the product, exactly what are your guidelines? There were ten or more albums released last year that were better than Sgt Peppers, or Dark Side, if not more... there was because that's progress, evolution, development; it's refinement and redirection and the embracing of technology and sociological elements that simply never existed before the time of those records' gestations.

Music is movement, not moments; it's not judged on static fossils, but on living processes. Snapshots serve as reminders, lists as spotters guides, but there's no such thing as categorical zeniths, as absolute classics. How can there be? If there was everyone making music today would give up.

Saying that the Beatles were shit is not a daft opinion. It is an opinion. Do you not see that that's the beauty of such instantaneous art as pop music - one man's brilliance is another's annoyance. If you can't see that standards exist only in the mind of the individual, and that the archaic notion of classics is born of redundant commentators alone, then truly you're discussing music in the wrong place. Go talk to a wall.

What does it matter what I gave an album that came out last year? What's the relation of that to this argument? I like Bloc Party.

70%

isn't just over 50%. if that's your first sentence i can't be bothered reading the rest.

damn i

failed maths!

incidentally,

how many people voting for this thing own every album on the list?

ok so i read your post.

'one man's brilliance is another's annoyance'. so why am i not allowed to express my opinion that your pluto list is full of, in my opinion, average albums? you called my opinion rubbish. there have been, in my opinion, some outstanding albums released in the last 12 months: hercules and love affair, cut copy, crystal castles, fleet foxes off the top of my head..atlas sound and times new viking are two brilliant albums that i discovered through this website.

come on burial...

although i can't believe that radiohead aren't favourites given on how much media attention they've been given.
Do you think Burial will collect his award in person? I'd love to hear his voice.

take it to The Quietus sister

i think it's a bit sad that you're so militantly pro "new music", rarely looking backwards and constantly pressing forwards (although i suppose it's an effect of being a new-music mogul). Patronisingly enough, i feel a bit sorry for you

And just because you don't like "the classics" doesn't mean there isn't a hell of a lot to discover from times already passed. I could name a fuckload of records from The Past which are better than xyz. And basically, much as i take onboard your opinion on music being about movements, it's about moments as well. In fact, if you totally reject moments then you might as well stop talking about records altogether - go immerse yourself in the artists involved with a scene and view it from a totally organic perspective. Because once it gets pressed onto wax that's it. The motherfucker is a relic, a document, an artifact of a specific time and place and feeling.

Are the records on the list going to stand up in the future? Who knows. Will you want to listen to them again in the future? I would hope so

I am not saying you shouldn't...

...although you should assess things based on the full facts available, i.e. the dismissal of certain releases based on snippets is questionable.

In short: hooray, all told.

There's nothing militant about my position here.

Far from it. I appreciate precedents. I look back to move forward, but forward is the direction one must move.

Of course a record is a 'moment' of sorts, the distillation of discourse to that point. My point is that it's dangerous to dwell upon conventionally recognised 'classics' given the individuality of assessments, changing tastes and the development of technology.

Take it to the Quietus... did a review for them the other day, actually.

Burial

I've just remembered that it was the Mercury prize last year that brought me to read DiS.

A year ago I would never have even listened to Burial let alone thought him so deserving of such a prize. He conjures up an impression in my mind not just of time but of over-lapping images like flash-backs e.g. 'In McDonalds'. Untrue is a work of total genius.

So thanks Mercury, and thanks DiS.

As to the Pluto prize - well Foals surely, though I would be very happy if M.I.A. wins

sure

any opinion of what is "classic" should be taken with a pinch of salt - it's as much about external factors than it is about the music itself. An unquestioning view of the canon is very dangerous indeed, but most actual music fans do question them. The canon is partly a self extending cycle caused by lots of people listening to something because it's hyped, and y'know.. loving it. So the sense of it being part of a canon amongst a majority is continued.

But the same is true about whatever processes were put in place to form the Pluto shortlist. It is an exercise which is primarily based the current opinions of the compilers, and so is coloured by a lack of foresight as much as the canon is coloured by a sense of reverent rose-tintedness. In my opinion, the records on the list should have a sense of longevity - if they fail to live beyond the blogospherical hype surrounding whatever "best album of the year" list they might be involved in then i'd suggest that they are in some way not *that* good. But maybe that's just a criteria that i use and which you don't. Who is right? Me of course, but for argument's sake we'll put it down to the old opinion conundrum

i thought i was

pretty qualified to make the statement: 'PROBABLY because SO MANY of them are so average'.

10 albums released last year better than Sgt Peppers?

Rubbish. I'd love to see your list of these albums. I agree with a lot of what you say, and it is all opinions of course, but, heck, 10 or more albums better than Pepper last year?! :-0

There were some great albums for sure and see your point about music moving forward. Albums today sure do sound more advanced in terms of production, sonic effect etc. and all of this is important, but I think what really makes a great album is intangible and hard to analyse. I'm struggling to explain my point but I think some albums just 'sound' special, like Pepper etc. From the past few years, of the albums I've heard, I think for example Bon Iver's album will be held up as a classic in years to come.

Anyway, mini-rant over. I'm off to listen to The Kinks Are The Village Green Preservation Society :-)

'blogspherical'

Lose eleven million indie points.

hey

i've got plenty spare

^5s

WELL

I would personnally like Radiohead to win as I think In Rainbows is one of their greatest albums.

But Burial really would be the most logical winner (great album and popular "newcomer") It would make the mercury prize actually look vaguely on the ball.

If that makes sense.

The british sea power album is also excellent.

Thats dumb logic

people don't win because they are ace!

honestly :P

Marling will win.

60% of the time I'm 100% right. Off to Ladbrooks.

is music really moving forward in alot of these cases?

to take one example, portishead's third was done a whole lot better a full 10 years ago. mezzanine by massive attack was the album

i got Burial at 6/1

i did

smart money

on burial & marling but I'm not smart so I've banked on elbow producing a shock

i got in rainbows at 6.2/1

and antony and the johnsons at 13/1 a fewyearsback!! that was lucky punt

lol

that was such a pathetic rant, proper funny seeing peasants like you get fired up about nothing

I would bet on radiohead winning

OK Computer missed out 11 years ago and i think this is the best album by Radiohead since then. One of the few albums of last year that i keep coming back to. Burial and Elbow would be close runners up.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon