Sign In:

Chart round-up: it's a DiScussion, too. Wow!

So, indie-rock’s holiday in the sun, its honeymoon period following comeback second albums by Razorlight and The Killers, appears to be over: boybands are back, baby, in a big way.

With Take That – be they back for good or just visiting to make a few bucks for the mortgages – at the top of the singles chart and Westlife beating off competition from Oasis, U2 and The Beatles to romp to the top of the albums chart, it seems that not-so-subtle key changes and four-piece vocal harmonies are very much the order of the commercial-music day. But what does it mean for those following in the reformation wake of the former and the comparatively new-kids-on-the-block coattails of the latter?

So far, so few new boybands have made an impression in 2006: the MTV-assembled Upper Street, comprised of members of S Club 7 and Another Level, 911 and New Kids On The Block, could only make number 35 earlier this year with their ‘The One’ single; they’ve since split up. But does Westlife’s success – against most odds before the release of last week’s aforementioned big three – mean that next year will witness the return of boybands in a big way? And what about Take That: will their amazing comeback success pave the way for the likes of Five/5ive – also recently reassembled, albeit minus one (4our?), and spotted at DiS’s Barfly bash t’other week! – to reap many a reward in the next twelve, or even six, months? What about Steps? They’ve expressed an intention, however slight, to return to action (link).

Of course, not every comeback can be as successful as that of Gary Barlow and company – All SaintsStudio 1 album debuted at 40 last week, but this week sees it waaaaay down at 74. This despite their ‘Rock Steady’ single rising a place on the singles chart, from eight to seven, even though it sounds tailor-made to soundtrack a tampon ad’. Go rollerblading! What can it mean? That you simply can’t predict the charts these days? Probably that and nothing more, although it must be stressed that, that single aside, Studio 1 isn’t so hot. A reported 51% drop in sales from its first week to the second, alongside the single’s success, is surely an indication of word-of-mouth influence along said lines.

So, will boybands, and girlbands, old and new, return to the pop chart thrones for good in the near future, or is this week’s double-header merely a blip, a slight divergence from the established norm of bland-ish indie bands conquering all. Do the charts even matter today, and will they matter even less once the rules are changed early next year to allow any downloadable song to chart, regardless of a physical release? Yes, that means that if you and your 200,000 MySpace mates all downloaded 40 Verve songs in the same week, we could have a top 40 full of nothing else. Great.

So, DiScuss, once you’ve read over the other new entries in this week’s chart…

Album chart: Oasis’s Stop The Clocks best-of debuts at two, followed by The Beatles’ Love at three and U2’s U218 Singles a place lower. Last week’s number one, George Michael, falls to five. Akon makes 22 with his Snoop Dogg and Eminem-featuring opus Konvicted – cunt can’t spell, though – while Killswitch Engage impress with their As Daylight Dies making 64 (review). Foo Fighters’ boring Skin & Bones acoustic collection staggers, bored out of its own mind, to 35, and Tom Waits’ Orphans three-CD set makes 49. Bravo!

Singles chart: Take That, as aforementioned, climb from four to one this week with their sounds-like-Coldplay ‘Patience’; Akon’s ‘Smack That’ falls a place to two. Nelly Furtado’s got a new entry at 13 with ‘All Good Things (Come To An End)’, and The Killers’ ‘Bones’ enters at 50 on downloads. Damien Rice’s ‘9 Crimes’ debuts five places lower than Flowers and co, and The Noisettes’ ‘Don’t Give Up’ (review) is new at 73. That’s a place above The Pussycat Dolls! Bravo!

New releases as recommended, and not, by DiS can be seen here. Buy the Muse single! Buy it!

lol

Nice work there

I would

but Muse are shit.

I didn't know the rules were changing

Forgive me for my ignorance but with these new rules could that mean (hypothetically speaking) if an unsigned band released a song on I-tunes and 200'000 people downloaded it then that band would get a number one??

5ive are great!

everyone should own their second album.

yes

Does

money have to change hands or wil free downloads count?

claire from steps is

now fatter than jupiter.

amusing.

If only she licked the wrong side of the stamp

then she would be in NME's cool list.

errr...

...I guess they'd have to be paid-for downloads.

It would be so amazing

if Knights Of Cydonia got to number one. And then stayed their for Chrimbo :D

It has crap B-sides though, so I doubt I'll buy it.

Yeah!

Suck on THAT, Pussycat Dolls!

argh

my eyes.

Question

If the Indie bubble is about to burst and pop seems not to hint at any revival?

What direction will the Music Chart go next?!?!

death metal

It's the only logical progression.

I've just listened to the

Upper Street single for the first time and I really like it. It's better than I expected, as boybands go.

Erm, can I ask for a the revival of Fast Food Rockers?

bf

this whole 'revival' mentality fucking makes me sick.

Isn't it amazing how you got fifties music, sixties music, seventies music, eighties music, and then retro music. Fucking rubbish.

The reason for that is that the cokehoovers are too scared to sign anyone who isn't a 19 year old amoeba who doesn't know shit from their elbow and couldn't make an unpretentious artistic statement if their lives depended on it.

I watched a bit of top of the pops two the other night. It was amazing to me how many classic songs from the seventies and eighties that we all know and love, were made by wrinkled old bastards who wouldn't get any further than the foyer of EMI today.

The music industry just keeps on shooting itself in the foot...because the INDIVIDUALS involved in making the decisions are too afraid their grand a month 'ents' budget is going to grind to a halt if they sign someone who is over 25, ugly, or writes fucking good songs! unadventurous tossers.

I'm just amazed that a band such as the futureheads, lame though they are, could be dropped after a successful couple of records. Sure, their last album may have only got to seventy or something(?)Some of the greatest artists ever didn't trouble the charts at any point, but did they get dropped?

Judee Sill?...Gene Clark?...Nick Drake? ...I mean, none of these acts would have made a second album, if they'd even got to make a first album. Even the Beach Boys past 1967- some of their best records- Sunflower got to like, a hundred and ten on the charts. Would a modern record company have allowed them to make a follow up? Would they fuck. As it happens that follow up was 'surfs up'. Yay to the modern music industry! What we have learned over the past forty years, is that we wouldn't have wasted the money involved in making 'surfs up' hoorah! One less classic album to worry about!

Good article

Although you missed out the reformation of Don Caballero - bearing in mind the drummer is the only origianl member, the new album got bad reviews and the fact that the majority of its hardcore fanbase refuses to acknowledge the new line up. OK bad example. there also Bis (although I think its just a one off)

and a lot thinner

there's 5.9 calories in every stamp you lick.

she must have gotten through a few quids worth.

well grockle that's

a good point. cos basically who gives a shit what the latest scene is as long as there's good music to buy - except if there's a choke on new talent then we're really screwed. except i don't totally agree - let the music industry screw itself up, seal off any new talent, drive everyone with any taste to hate everything out there and then, and only then, will a truly indie scene re-emerge with original music. small labels need the lack of individuality shown by big labels if they're to survive.

the noughties (excuse the horrific headline naming) are about postmodernism - pastiche and rehash, churn and spew. sad but true - but the hope is that the next decade will be one of truly inspirational quality. mid 40s to mid 50s? shocker - and then came, effectively, the whole modern music scene from mid-50s on. today's is a necessary hiatus for refreshing the well.

but i don't like the beach boys. oh well.

radiohead are

the most progressive mainstream rock band since the beatles, in terms of what they've done with their last three albums and still remained massive sellers.

and they're an anomaly, because although creep was a bit pants... but it was also the only reason they got to make 'the bends'.

that's enough stating the obvious from me...

you're right bedge, there has to be something new... and it has to happen soon.

something that'll blast our socks off...

my money's on a transvestite with a washboard selling 800,000 records in 2009.

i'm so

putting in a pre-order for that...

breastfuck

The only reason The Beatles are considered 'progressive' is cos they are the most famous band that did progressive things- not cos they actually initiated them.

Oh, to give them their dues, they were the first band to put shit childrens songs on their albums and STILL have people beg to suck the shit from their scouse arseholes

famous

hence "mainstream rock band"

the same way radiohead didn't initiate electronic music, it was comparatively obscure non-mainstream bands like autechre, squarepusher, aphex twin et al

not a big fan of the beatles neither mate

hold up

that reads wrong

*the same way radiohead were influenced by... and didn't initiate them

not that anyone really cares, but i can go back to sleep now

really

interesting read. I think counting EVERY download as chart elligible could be strange as it most probably won't represent a lot of new artists. But who knows, it may really help the smaller bands with solid fan-bases!

ah, Take That

Well, I was such a fan from the ages of about 12 to 15 (and simultaneously listening to the Evening Session; no-one should ever apologise for loving the pop. Anyway, because of that formative time, I still get happy shivers now when I hear of Take That. And Gary was always my favourite: history has proved me right. I still definitely, DEFINITELY would. Bring on the boy band revival!

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon