Sign In:
Login with Facebook

U2 announce another best-of album

WAIT! Didn't a pair of best-of albums come out t'other year? I'm sure I have one. Or maybe two. Don't hurt me...

Anyway, Irish rockers U2 are to release another best-of compilation record, albeit with new songs alongside a selection of (probably fairly predictable) classics.

The two new songs are produced by Rick Rubin; one, 'The Saints Are Coming', is a collaboration with Green Day. The album's released on November 20.

The album's tracklisting is yet to be officially announced. (I.e. we can't tell you... yet. But you can guess, right?)

How can

there be a best of U2? Possibly a worst...

It's controversial to say it I know

but I think U2 do actually have enough material for a decent best-of.

Best Of BS

This kind of shite really winds me up! As you say, no more than a few years ago they released two "best of" albums. Do they actually feel that their last two albums were go amazingly great that it merits the release of this? I think not.

For someone so concerned about poverty and world capitalism, Bono seems only too happy to bow to corporate pressure when it lines his pockets

This is strange

U2 have the best of 1980-1990 and 1990-2000

since 2000 they have had one new album. There is no need for a new best of.

corporate pressure, in this case,

being hordes of besuited office drones, middle managers and their weathered partners all clamouring for more easy-on-the-ear empty hollow faux-progressive pieces of aural shite to absorb whilst sitting in their humble abodes in suburban hell, picking their noses and shouting for another glass of cheap pink wine.

fuck 'em, and fuck their soundtrack as well.

This winds me up:

How to reward loyal fans - Release a best of which contains two new songs which compels the hardcore fans into buying it.

It may be controversial

but it's true.

Dear Mr Bongo

and the Mr The Edge of Oirland,

You spoil us, no really you do. And a Green Day collaboration. I can only compliment you on both your artistic endeavour and your rampant commercialism. Love you!

The Edmund.

Their Groupie-Love-Children

Probably have to buy them for the Mondeo - plenty of them are going to be old enought to vote by now...

YEAH!

Let's give to The Man! I would imagine that The U2 were forced into this tricky situation by the evil The Man who owns their record company and made them do it so he could buy more heroin for his kids or summat. He is eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaavvvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllllleeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

ha ha! too true!

I can just imagine Billy Joe Armstrong, back in those early 90s, Gilman Street, Smoothed out Slappy Hours days, sitting on a stoop, drinking beer, dreaming about working with Bono...

maybe it'll be an actual definitive

best of, with ALL the decent songs on, a mix of the last two, with added 'bullet the blue sky' and no fucking dance remixes.

How can you say

no dance remixes? On A Ragga Tip was their biggest of big hitters FFS!

Nobody

has to buy this - you could just download the two new songs if you're bothered. I have to buy it though because Bono is my father, it's part of the deal.

much as i dislike them your probably right

enough for one best of...not 3 which is the numeber they have released....

could it possibly be a U2 RED (the best of)....for which all profits go to BONIO's red charity-where he gets people who exploit povery- Gap et al, to give money to poor people...hmmm

If its not for profit, fair play..if its just another bid to line bono's pockets he really is on another planet

full blown aids?

you mean the side project by the guy from anal cunt? i'm not even joking..thats what its called

I can beat that claim to fame

The Edge is my cousin's ex-girlfriend.

like buses

I admired them for not putting out a best of for so many years, but now, like buses, they're all coming in a flurry!

I...

...really like U2.

another one?

have they been releasing secret albums or something....?

This would be a valid question, if it wasn't for the size of Bono's ego.

I'm sure I read somewhere...

That due to the fear of a change in Ireland's tax laws (like other "artists" Bono & co currently don't pay income tax), U2 were moving assets out of the country even as we speak.

I love Achtung Baby, but everything else they've ever done makes me want to throw up. Sorry

yep they relocated to Holland

where the taxes are lower.

Exactly.

Are they just going to release their last 2 albums again, and put all those songs on a single CD?

A new Best Of album since their last one means.....

....their new Best Of album will probably be a single, no? Maybe a short EP?

I hate to play devil's advocate, but...

1) It is highly likely that this album is a studio venture, not the band's greedy whim.

2) If someone is that much of a fan that they'll pay an album's price for two songs, well it's a silly choice, but so is buying The Others' new album. God I hate The Others.

3) I don't like U2, i haven't bought any of their numerous albums, but it seems as though for them nowadays the ends justify the means - they make money for charity (and obviously themselves), and we don't listen. Poor people benefit, we don't listen to two new U2 tracks.

4) Fair enough this venture probably is going to line fatcats' flappy pockets, but the fatcats are always going to get stroked so let's concentrate on what is new and relevant.

In conclusion: fuck U2 but fair play to them.

tut

for fucks sake, haven't we had enough?

bono...

...can suck my bono, the tit.

hey, i hear jesus is looking for a replacement, maybe bono the saint can take his place.

bono is bollocks, baby.

he hasn't made a decent record in fifteen years.

saying that i quite liked that batman forever track they did.

I don't know, little boys!

I'm a hard line alternative music fan and have been for many years but this diatribe against U2 is immature and incorrect. I agree that 3 best of albums is stupid but someone will but them and therefore that is why they release them. Repackaging hits albums is comon now (Beatles, Elvis, Stones, even Hendrix and the Doors) I don't doubt that they have their older fans who (shock horror) have jobs, families and live in the 'burbs. Fact is they have been around since 1979. What do you expect? I'm not a massive fan but I know their music pretty well and I have to say that they stay relevant. See Q reviews, the 'too cool for school' DJs such as Zane Lowe, Tonge, et al, they all agree. Now if you don't fine, but when you leave Uni (a guess because I was an immature faux nihalist too) and enter planet earth you'll appreciate respect and how this bunch of blokes deserve it.

Go listen to your 'scarey' pastiche bands who sell you a line like crack cocaine and grow up.

:yawn:

Up til 1997, U2 were (at times) phenomenal. Now get your head out your arses and your attention span out of the last ten years and realise that they have an impressive back catalogue.

This release is still unneccesary though. But then again, the last two studio albums were pointless too.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon