Sign In:
Login with Facebook
46485

Radiohead's Kid A - the DiS re-appraisal



Prompted by Radiohead Week, a raft of re-issues from, erm, some record company or other and the shameful knowledge DiS awarded Kid A a scathing 4/10, way-back-when. It’s time to make amends...

 

Kid A was born in 2000, towards the end of New Labour's first term. Kid A parents were quietly thinking about religion (and whether it looks unfashionable these days), but mostly about which young and upwardly mobile people to invite around, and which shirts showed sweat during important meetings.

Kid A would grow up amid ever-escalating tests that made school un-fun, but new media all the more exciting. Kid A's parents were secretive about whether or not they gave Kid A the combined jab (increasing the risk of autism), and there was a lot of gossiping about who was doing what (with little regard for actual medical advice), whilst no-one seemed to question the fact that everyone's kids seemed to be on the spectrum of autistic disorders nowadays… could it be all that time spent in front of the computer? Kid A grew up with a fear of public transport, after something happened he only dimly remembered, and so he liked the safety of his parents' big car, although sometimes there were scratches down the side, in the morning, like a wild animal tried to get through the doors. Kid A had nightmares about a street full of people carrying babies in coffins that his parents couldn't explain – maybe he saw it on the History Channel?

It's almost as if it was a memory from another life, seen through a fog of amnesia. Kid A knew there were bad people in the world, but they were far away, and they abused our trust, buying our weapons to defend themselves, they said. All in all, Kid A was - on average - fitter, happier but by the time he was eight or nine he could see the poor kids were dropping out faster; you only noticed after their grades slipped that more often came from those rows of identical houses in the labyrinthine estates – until then, they seemed equal to you, identical, almost like you're all clones of each other.

"Kid A is dedicated to Leo"

As Grant Gee's tour-film / Rockumentary / allegory-of-accelerated culture that is Meeting People Is Easy shows, Radiohead's fourth album came freighted with as much baggage as, well, its dedicatee; the son of the second most important (or, at least, most visible) person in the world, one of a generation of instant-celebrity children who would be in the crosshairs of journalists looking to exploit signs of double-standards on the part of actual public figures, rather than doing all the brainwork and dissecting their ideology. By the same token, the media, circa 2000, seemed to be asking: would Radiohead be able to save the planet? Were their tours as green as their rhetoric? Would their follow-up to the most critically acclaimed album of the decade save popular culture? Was guitar-music dead? Had we all overloaded five young men from Oxford with messianic expectations because we no longer had faith in our capacity to participate in democracy? (Okay, I made up the last one; so far as I know, no-one was that prescient; not even the satirical author Curtis White, who hauled Nick Hornby over the critical coals for berating Radiohead's betrayal of their fans, as if they should remain one-trick ponies AND LIKE IT; White branded Hornby's negative review of Kid A symptomatic of a commerce-driven, target-oriented culture desperately in need of some experimentation to cure it.)

 


 

Depending on your interpretation of Radiohead's underlying ethos, Kid A (2000) is either: a slightly uneven and generally less dynamic version of Business-as-Usual, with new equipment (samplers, Kaos pads, Pro-Tools) and very old (the Ondes Martenot, a jazz horn-section, a pump organ) all so as to provide new textures, in place of custom-built effects-pedals; OR it's an unprecedentedly bold move into electronica for a band who in the 1990s pretty much perfected (post-punk and new-wave derived) guitar music; OR it's a very-much-precedented move into electronica from a bunch of charlatans who could be reasonably confident a bit of dabbling wouldn't be a career-killer (cf. Bjork's Homogenic album; Blur from The Great Escape onwards; UNKLE's Psyence Fiction).

 


 

There's a lot of truth in each of the above. Thing is, about half of Kid A is a legitimate "move into electronica" and not a case of "bringing in the synths" as everyone from Genesis to The Strokes has done, when inspiration and musicianship fails them; after all, the dynamics of pop or rock music (geared towards dancing, shagging, exercise, and repetitive tasks) just aren't there. Track by track: 'Everything in Its Right Place' is as bright and refreshing and un-rock'n'roll as a glass of orange juice with the morning papers; Yes, it displays the 'opulent harmonics' Alex Ross praises Radiohead for, generally, and the line "We've got heads on sticks / You've got ventriloquists" is two-party politics provocatively reduced to Itchy & Scratchy, but almost ten years on, it still feels like throat-clearing for the album-proper. Actually, so does 'Kid A', the melody of which stumbles even more naïvely over psychedelic sounds of Yellow Submarine flowers waking up and stretching their petals. For both, Thom may have a shiny new toy (a human voice generating programme), but then so did The Beatles on 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer' (i.e. a Moog). As a pair, they're easy to like, but you have to work hard to argue for their importance.

 


 

The album hits its stride on 'The National Anthem' and 'How to Disappear Completely', each six minutes long. Darker than almost anything before, the combination of fat, grinding bass and a hovering, otherworldly Ondes Martenot make the former a more compelling depiction of the struggle to speak amidst the cacophony of the early 21st century. The latter took a simple, familiar, busker-friendly chord progression on acoustic guitar (just the one suspended chord dropped in, as a surprise), and placed it over bubbling horns, low in the mix, and swooping violins in a call-and-response pattern with cellos representing dark valleys between these peaks. A few years before, R.E.M. had opened their long, recorded-on-the-road, experimental album (New Adventures In Hi-Fi) with a curiously sparse piano number, and then daringly stuck two astonishingly dark songs back-to-back that threw everything into the whirlwind of Stipe's imagination, and could easily be regarded as career-bests. In comparison, Yorke seemed to be shying away from his voice-of-a-generation status, as a younger Stipe had done... even as Yorke struggled to live up to his heroes.

 


 

Mid-album, 'Treefingers' erased Yorke altogether, for an oneiric flight over the landscape depicted in the artwork; paradoxically, this was the clearest message yet – if you keep pushing me (again, see Meeting People Is Easy), maybe I will disappear, like Richey Manic. It seems banal to gloss the end-of-days lyrics of 'How to Disappear Completely' as references to Radiohead's Glastonbury appearance ("Floodlights / And blo-wn speakers / Fire-works / and hurricanes // I'm not here / This isn't happening"), and the chorus as a mantra for dealing with stress (or fame?) suggested by Stipe, rather than an existential statement about the illusoriness of a star's persona. Actually, though, if you've seen footage from the stage, outwards across the beatific crowd, you'll know what Thom means, saying "It's not a human feeling", in a later interview. At the time, you could see he was looking over the edge of the world, just as Pulp's last-minute Glastonbury appearance in 1995 had seen them elevated to godlike status.

 


 

Side Two (as it were) dilutes its highs... but it's not a drop-off overall. 'Optimistic' is a live recording, and far from the best version – others you can find on bootlegs have a looser, funkier, more melodic bassline; Thom's voice sounds like it "Just came out of the swamp..." The choice of live-version was an attempt to cut through their own perfectionism, as a band, but that, in turn, tells you the amount of pressure Radiohead were under as a band – you might expect Thom to experience a hypomanic deluge of ideas... and the inability to choose between all his recent lyrics (ultimately, spread across three albums); the experience was head-spinning, though, for all four players and producer Nigel Godrich. Over the next four tracks, Thom juxtaposes mystical visions and domestic ennui: 'In Limbo' floats you through the waters surrounding the Hellish city of Dis, 'Idioteque' dances while New Rome burns, the album's final harps and strings are a Disneyfied ascent into Heaven… but 'Morning Bell' is the underlying panic of the bourgeoisie, poorly anaesthethised by "Red wine and sleeping pills" in the lyric of 'Motion Picture Soundtrack').

 


 

Ultimately, Radiohead shot themselves in the foot by spreading so much innovative material across Kid A (2000) and Amnesiac (2001), not to mention that they shuffled the order and thereby obscured the journey-through-Hell narrative Thom had embedded in his lyrics, after being immersed in his partner's doctoral dissertation about Dante. The (historical) "Story of Kid A" (above) isn't really told on the album, although it's in the background of Kid A, Amnesiac, and Hail To The Thief. From a purely musical perspective, a hypothetical Kid Amnesiac album boasting 'Spinning Plates' and 'I Might Be Wrong' would certainly have challenged OK Computer (1997), and could have been followed by a mini-album just as eclectic as the How's my driving? B sides collection. In almost every respect, 'Packt like Sardines' is a better opener, articulating Thom's resistance to his public image, whilst integrating processed beats and samples with Aphex-like intricacy; the drum-sample collage of 'Revolving Doors' would have bridged the rhythm-dominated tracks at the heart of Kid A better than the drift of 'Treefingers'; 'Dollars and Cents' is the most powerful of the Can-like explorations of rhythm, across the twin albums, underscoring the anti-capitalist tirade that's muddled and scumbled on Kid A. Then again, two (or three?) 10/10 albums in a row, with mounting pressure to deliver a fourth would have broken the band, and which would you rather...? Thought so.

(8/10)

 


 

Plus, how great would Kid A have been if Radiohead had finished this in time, instead of taking another ten years...?

 

you're getting there DiS!

hopefully just 4/5 years now before you admit it's the album of the decade.

And here's the original 4/10 review by Graham Reed:

"What do you get the man who has everything?

Well, that certainly sounds like a Radiohead song title, almost to the point of parody. However, it probably a question that Radiohead were asking themselves when the "OK Computer" tour came to a close. When you’ve reinvented the wheel, where do you go next? The same question oasis asked themselves in 1996 after conquering the world in much the same way that Radiohead found themselves hailed as the new saviours of music in the aftermath of the exemplary OK Computer. Oasis went off and created "Be Here Now", a hugely disappointing album that in retrospect seems composed of good B-sides. It seems the loftier the heroes the bigger the fall. While the critical reaction for "Be Here Now" was one of high praise (soon revoked), the praise for "Kid A" so far is one of total and utter confusion. The circumstances have been carefully manipulated to ensure maximum secrecy here: no videos, no singles, no advance copies of the album (except on digital MP3 players sent out to select persons). The paranoia increases. That didn’t stop Mp3s’ of virtually the whole album appearing online weeks before its release, thanks to the sensibility of premiering new songs live months before the official release.

But nonetheless expectations were high, unrealistically so. No matter how good this album was going to be, it was always going to be a let down. Very few people were prepared for just how much of a let down it is though. Radiohead openly admit that they have totally changed their modus operandi in producing this album, and taken a lot of electronica influences such as Aphex twin and Autechre, and Jazz influences such as Miles Davis’ improvisational “Bitches Brew”. The resulting mix is a lot more akin to something that would be issued on Warp or Rephlex, rather than a big chart friendly multinational like EMI. Its rumoured that upon hearing this album, upon which the majority of EMI’s big hopes were pinned, Christmas bonuses were cancelled. Well, Its not easy to guess why.

From the opening “Everything in it’s right place” to the closing hidden track, the overall tone of “kid A” is sombre, muted, discreet. Perhaps the best comparison musically would be the U2 album “Passengers” album recorded with Brian Eno, an overall impressionistic, indulgent ambient album, with further hints of Brian Enos “Discreet Music”. The ghost of U2 and Brian Eno haunt this CD, and Rather like U2 taking Brian Eno on board for their “Unforgettable Fire” album (3rd album big breakthrough, fourth album impressionistic). Its as much a radical reinvention as “Achtung baby” was at the time, only rather than re-inventing everything for the better, its been reinvented for the worst.

For a start, forget everything you know and expect about Radiohead. The rules no longer apply. You are through the looking glass. The best way to think of this is as a collection of abstractions, rather than songs. Traditional songwriting no longer applies. The main aim here, it seems is Radiohead are attempting to make things fresh, exciting, unusual, to reinvent themselves. To challenge themselves and their own preconceptions of making music, and in doing so to challenge their audiences expectations, and in doing so, Radiohead seem to want to reinvent themselves as electronic pioneers. Radiohead want to create new sounds, sounds never heard before. Sounds that may be fresh, new, bold and exciting. In doing so, they have created something unlike any normal record. Vocals flit in and out, sampled, cut up, turned into incoherent babble, trumpet solos appear from nowhere, traditional song structures abandoned. Drum Loops come out of nowhere, ethereal and synthesised bass and keyboard parts emerge and then disappear, moving in and out of focus, sometimes near, sometimes far.

This sounds may appear new to Radiohead, but anyone seriously interested in electronica will discern a different tale whatsoever, with hints of Aphex Twin, Autechre, Muziq, Pete Namlook, two lone Swordsmen and so forth being key reference points. It probably most closely resembles “Rabbit in the Headlights”, Thom Yorkes collaboration with James Lavelle, crossed with the synth bass sounds of Ok Computers “Climbing up the walls”, and echoes the “nothing” soundtrack Orbital composed also. In times, the mood it evokes – cold, distanced, muted, detached, - is more alike “Fitter Happier” than any other Radiohead track. These sounds may seem new, fresh, exciting to the band, but ultimately they are not. They are nothing that hasn’t been done before, by people with considerably more innovation rather than merely aping and emulating their peers. In letting the sounds take precedence over songwriting, and allowing songs to evolve rather than be structured logically and comprehensibly, Radiohead have created an album which sounds like a low key release on Warp, which by any other band under any other name would probably sell about 10,000 copies worldwide at most. It may seem fresh, exciting, bold, and deliberately uncommercial. It is also cold, hostile, unwelcoming, and deliberately alienating, as if it is an example of how to make their career disappear completely. It’s like listening to Lou Reeds “Metal Machine Music”, such is the effect on the listener, feeling distanced and unwanted intrusive and alienated from the whole emotional context of the music.

Sure, there are moments of inspiration and brilliance: occasionally melodies and subtleties shine through. In time it may be remembered as a masterpiece, in time it may be remembered as the biggest folly they ever made. It’s a case of lets throwaway everything we've ever achieved, lets be something we're not, lets pretend we're radical and different and exciting and new, because we've lost the plot. If OK computer was their wall or dark side, then this is the second CD of Ummagummna, pretentious, irrelevant, indulgent.. Artistic control = genius or chaos, depending on whether the artist can exercise self-restraint, and none is in evidence here. Ultimately, its reactionary to the point of self-annihilation.

This will without doubt be remembered as their worst album, their Spaghetti Incident, their very own "My Beauty". One thing it is certainly seems is art for arts sake, devoid of purpose, experimentation for experimentation’s sake, art without purpose, pretentious and alienating. It’s a trip alright, but an ugly one, not one you want to make often. Be warned."

I like the way the second last paragraph of that review ...

contains ''In time it may be remembered as a masterpiece, in time it may be remembered as the biggest folly they ever made.''

And the final paragraph starts ''This will without doubt be remembered as their worst album, their Spaghetti Incident, their very own "My Beauty".''

Christ, picked the wrong option there.

The reappraisal's a bit unnecessary though. Does it really need a score? I think EIIRP is a far stronger opener than Packt Like Sardines, and Kid A's beautiful in it's understated way. Also, adding those songs off Amnesiac would just ruin the flow and make kid A sound disjointed (so more like Amnesiac and AHTTT then).

Maybe they'll give Lift and Follow Me Around a proper release 5 years from now.

heh

'This will without doubt be remembered as their worst album'

fail

That version of Nude

is better than the one on In Rainbows

Nude

better on the ok computer tour, no doubt.

give them a break!

At least they bloody well released it. If you hadn't heard the earlier version you'd be all over the new one like a nude rash

Kid A Is A Pretty Good Album

A 7 or 8 is probably fair.

OK Computer is almost a curse. It won't be topped, no matter how many times Thom bangs his head against a keyboard.

It's just the way life works.

"We've got heads on sticks / You've got ventriloquists" is from Kid A,

not Everything In It's Right Place.

*pedants corner

My favourite album of all time.

Defines a 10/10 for me.

my favourite

my favourite from Radiohead. better than OK Computer, I think. It was created by many fears, depressions, pains from failing and falling down and it makes it so authentic, fragile and painful. You can hear every little qualm in every one second of this piece. I love it

that is

a lovely bit of writing. made me think, innit.

Great re-review

Although I do think you should have left the original review still up (good for debates and stuff etc)

^^^^^^^^^^^^

This.

Agreed...

If I remember correctly, Melody Maker gave it 3/10, Q 2 or 3/5 and NME 7/10, so it was hardly an uncommon review for the time. I also think it makes a few really good points. I, for one, found it pretty pompous of many of their fans that continually hailed them for 'inventing' electronica at the time, when clearly they were under the direct influence of UNKLE and Squarepusher et al. Plus, this album is the critical inversion of Be Here Now and that's a cultural landmark event that doesn't happen too often.

Oh FFS

You can be wrong DiS, it doesn't really matter that much! Everyone knew at the time it was an awesome record, but even the mother of all poor publications Q left it's review of Be Here Now as a 10/10, just to show they were wrong!

Get the original back on!

This is an awful review

re-appraisal/whatever

It's a total fucking mess.

I was looking forward to reading it; it's an album whos critical reception I still discuss eight and half years on. I still plunder the magazines I have from the months around its relase. I remember well a 7/10 in the NME, and then the same magazine giving 'Amnesiac's non-sequitors 8 OUT OF 10.

This re-appraisel is disrespectful. You're all over the shop. There are unbelievable amounts of bullshit and second guessing the bands choices. What's the point of suggesting alterations to the historicity of Kid A and Amnesiac to create an album that would "challenge OK Computer (1997cough)"? That would be AWFUL.

Please get someone to proof read next time. I'm glad your excited enough to write about Radiohead, especially Kid A, but it comes off to me over your past two articles that you've downloaded everything Radiohead has released fairly recently and have not soaked it in naturally over the last 10-17 years.

It reads like someone who writes an essay on Dante, having read his Inferno, and 5 books about the Inferno in one week.

Sorry if I sound horribly rude but the original review made me far less agitated. I would have spent a good week getting this right. *I* literally would have.

^^ This

All the kid a's parents stuff is utter bullshit.

In my opinion Kid A is one of the most complete albums of the decade. Some of the songs on Amnesiac are better than some of the songs on Kid A but it feels disjointed compared to Kid A.

Kid A is a masterpiece, probably my favourite Radiohead album.

you were wrong then

and you're still wrong now.. you manage to miss the most important aspect of this album, and that is, for want of a less wanky word, its texture. it is a deep, rich and coherent album in ways that no other album i've heard is.

in addition, you are misquoting lyrics all over the place. 'we've got heads on sticks' is not from 'everything', it's from 'kid a'... still you're not as much of a massive cock as mark beaumont, who gave it half a star out of 5 in melody maker in an attempt to be provocative and 'edgy'. what a dick.

dude

there's no apostrophe in possessive its. get out of pedants' corner, you have no right to be here.

why re-review it ?

surely there are plenty of others you'd want to change looking back ?

it's fun to look back and say aah we cocked it up, oh well !

At least DIS haven't removed all the nu-metal loving reviews

from the early 2000's, all of which are much, MUCH more embarrassing than any 'Kid A' 4/10...

I am so...

tired of Radiohead & their "importance". Kid A's a good album, it was kinda important at the time, but their whole aura is played out. Get on with it.

You fucking pussies

Why don't you have the courage of your convictions and stand by your original review? I hope that you afford the same luxury to every album review you've ever done, just in case you've made a mistake, or you find that you're getting too much stick for giving a bad review when everyone else says it was a good album. Yeah you can change your mind, I really have no problem with that at all, but as I stated before, I fully expect you to now go back and re-review everything else. Are most people slagging Muse off now? Well, go back and give Origin of Symmetry 3/10 instead of the 10 you originally gave it. You utter fucking cowards.

I still don't really like it

I've tried, I really have, but I can only listen to Morning Bell, National Anthem, Everything in its Right Place and Optimistic.

There's no crime in re-evaluating a review

Especially as DiS is on a looking back over 11 years kick. The beauty of hindsight is that it is a different perspective.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion on Kid A, and I don't think the original review was *wrong*. It is just another opinion in a sea of opinions, as this re-evaluation is. If you don't like it or any other review, there are a million others out there, some of which will agree with you entirely.

What I think is interesting about Kid A was that it was the last Radiohead album that really took a kicking before critical consensus formed. A lot of people, including myself, expected another OK Computer and there's a very definite sense that people were let down by this record in reviews. I remember people saying at the time that they 'used to like Radiohead, but they've gone all weird'. 11 years on, their experimentation sounds a lot less frightening. But the original view on this album was written before the worldview on this album locked it down as a 'Classic'. It's to the credit of a fledgling DiS that the original reviewer was allowed to speak their mind and mark accordingly, and it also speaks to the maturity of the criticism DiS issues now to really have a good hard look at what most people on the boards seem to think of as a 'bad' review.

Never heard Kid A

and probabbly never will

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon