Sign In:
Login with Facebook
20674
Type: Album Release date: 29/01/2007
Your Rating:

For one minute, let's have some perspective. Let us all take a step back from the hyperbole, the 'hype' and the coining of new genres. Genres invented with the sole purpose of allowing lazy journalists, chattering around tables in JD Wetherspoon public houses, to appear more 'on it' than their contemporaries.

We're now on neutral ground: this is Villa Park during a League Cup semi-final, or the venue where you dump your long-term partner, somewhere away from your respective houses. In front of us sits Myths Of The Near Future; it's the debut album by New Cross three-piece Klaxons. You've not heard of them before, and they've certainly not yet been lucky enough to secure coverage in every music publication going.

Opener 'Two Receivers' is dark and brooding; its production is wide, far-reaching and produces a track that, despite being overtly simple in structure and composition, engulfs the listener and everything around them. Where the magic of Klaxons appears to lie thus far, then, is in their Lego-like building of simple ideas into atmospheric pop songs. An album along these lines sounds fantastic, thankyouverymuch.

Of course, as soon as 'Atlantis To Interzone' starts screaming "DJ!" at me, the comfort zone they've ushered in is cast aside like an axe through the skull of a small child. In the best way possible.

As each track plays out more and more sides to this musical beast are revealed: the effortless radio-friendly pop of current single 'Golden Skans' gives way to the relentless electro-punk of 'Totem On The Timeline'. At every corner, the band seem to be able to surprise - be it with their oblique literary references, melodic prowess or just how massive they, alongside producer James Ford, have managed to make this album sound.

A few tracks down the line and ‘Magick’ reopens Klaxons' can of darkness, but penetrates every line with floor-quaking energy and rhythmic intensity. This is leftfield pop at its most daring and is all the more listenable for its risk-taking.

Let's now return to Earth. You know, where Klaxons actually are on the cover of every other newspaper and magazine, and have been for a few months. Having made the effort and cast aside the media's conceptions, I'm happy to report that their position is justified: Myths Of The Near Future is a brick through the window of your next door neighbour’s and the starting gun in a race to your nearest club. It's a really, really fucking good and danceable pop album that avoids changing lives, but happily enhances them.

And that cover version? Klaxons have catapulted 'It's Not Over Yet' from slightly embarrassing dance 'classic' into one of the most uplifting, epic pop songs of the year.

This isn't a rave record. It was never supposed to be. It's a wildly varying catalogue of melody and energy that eschews genre and scene in favour of songwriting and awe-inspiringly beefy production. Don't let anything get in the way of you picking up this record: it's expansive, free from pretension and easily one of the finest debuts of recent times.

I'm really liking this record

Amid all the chaos and havoc there is a big dollop of fun and charm injected into every song. A strangely feel-good album.

I think it's worth about a 5 or 6

Pretty dull pop songs really.

The re-recording of Gravity's Rainbow

is cack, though.

its quite telling how

all the songs you mention in this review have been leaked on the internet in some form for a few months.
thats the worst thing about this album = the singles (and tracks) in advance were outstanding, but the rest seems a bit flat making an uneven album.

Atlantis To Interzone

is a stroke of genius on this record. They've re-recorded it to perfection.

The rerecorded...

version of Atlantis To Interzone has been available for a while on the twin 12"/7" remix pack on Merok for a good 6 months or so. Plus it's the version on the video they filmed for it

A great, subversive, surrealist pop album.

But it's inconsistent. Isle Of Her sounds EXACTLY like a band going through the motions. And Forgotten Worlds is achingly obvious, and a tad lazy.

Saying that, the rest is tantamount to genius and I desperately hope it stands the test of time.

They've re-recorded it?

The swines.

Funny thing is......

the tracks I've heard, if they'd come out 15 years ago would certainly have been rave tracks so not too sure what all this 'not rave' is about.

Problem is I'm getting on a bit and thought rave was shit the first time around and was more into techno and progressive house and other stupid genres of dance music and anyway have realised since that it only really sounded any good on E anyway so the last thing I want is a bloody rave revival...

i was

really really happy when i played this album today. I got it and though, this is going to be a dissapointment. And i loved about 3/4 of the track. Isle of her is shit though.
If only the cooper temple clause still sounded this good

D.J!

I was so pleased when I sat down and listened to this today - It's the first record I've bought in a long time where I haven't been sorely disappointed by a succession of lack-lustre filler packed around a few tasty singles. This is an album stuffed with clever ideas, obscure details, and most importantly, absolutely blazing tunes, tunes that sound like the offices of Stock, Aitken and Waterman being held at gunpoint by hooded cultists, or the Bee Gees being raped by the Sex Pistols on a bungee jump. Great band, great album (good review too).

Its a weird un.

I found myself hating the 'new rave' classification given to them, and felt sorry for them parading under such a proposterous NME term.

The thing is, I think I'd have probably preferred it if they HAD played up to the label. The old demos everyone heard (the fast, dancey singles) were what I loved most about Klaxons. I know they can do other things, but the highlights of the album are clearly the old dance tracks.

The thing is, it looks like they've responded to the irritating label by filling the album with non-danceable tunes. I just don't think they're good enough.

Test Icicles little brother

Reminds me of a nice version of Test Icicles (less gut’s, blood and balls), but with Good solid songs and party written all over it. definitely a Pill-thriller for the kids.
9/10

This has always been Klaxons

they were never about rave. They're an indie pop band through and through.

I know this album will split people, but I love it. If you don't, write a user review dude.

DIS

Give a 9 to absoloutley anything.

Seriously believe that it's 9/10th's perfect, Colin?

fuck this.

It's not rave. End of.

They started with the aesthetics of rave, but nothing else. Christ.

the re-recording of atlantis to interzone

is brilliant.

i think this is a really good album, alot of fun.

mmmmm....perspective

4 or 5 great tracks on this - even grumpy old me was taken aback but lots and lots of sub standard filler. so if we do ever get some perspective (like that ever happens) then its a worthwhile but flawed album -6 out of 10

but

if you started with the idea that beauty in art is manifested through rave, then surely all of your stuff will be rave (unless you don't want to sound good anymore?!).

If I Hear

people say this one more time, I'm liable to weild a sledgehammer

I shall buy this album

The end

I'm thinking of doing one.

I'm gonna do one for the College Magazine I think.

I'm not denying they've got talent, though. They've released probably the best single of 2006.

it's pretty damn ace to be honest

don't tell anyone i've got it though, got an indie reputation to keep up..

I've

heard about the 1st half of the album. Its a nice little album. dancable and a bit fun, slightly different. not exactly best album ever or anything. I agree a bit with 'amputee-porn', DiS seem to give everything 9 out of 10 these days.

smelly old men.

other than that

nothing.

MONDAY CLUB!

I was uneasy about

this album. I like klaxons and have xan valleys which is great, but I feared they might not have the variety and material to make a full length album that I could listen to in my room or on the street, even though they were great live. I might have to buy it now. Along with hella.

Hmmmmm

yeh after a few listens theres a couple weak songs (isle of her, forgotten works)

but the rest of it is pretty solid.

however nothing that we haven't been listenin to for the last year already.

I was hoping for a few new amazing tunes to rival the singles but it seems they've already released their best stuff

if i didnt know ne of this already it wud prob be 8/10

but id give it 7

the majority of the record buying public

doesn't sit there all day downloading leaked demos and for a song to be as old as you're implying, the band would have to have been going longer than the 16 months they've actually existed.

you're a tit.

This is a fucking good review

which recognises an excellent band for what they are, without giving in to 'cooler-than-thou' crap. Top.

9?

NINE?

If the quality throughout...

...had been on a par with the Xan Valleys EP, 9/10 for sure. The non-single stuff though is fairly standard pop - it's a 7/10 from me.

Still good though. And an ace live band.

golden skans video

Is pretty hilarious. It's like...

"LOOK UPON MY INDIE POP SONG, YE MIGHTY, AND DESPAIR!"

As a slice of classic pop it's pretty good. Like a Double Whopper; tastes really good at the time but leaves you guilty as hell afterwards.

crap fi

Like a really bad version of Hard Fi on booze - awful band.

This is better than I thought it would be

I was expecting most of the songs to be like Atlantis To Interzone, with loads of squeaky bleeps that would annoy me after a while, and thankfully this is not the case. It has a slower, calmer sound, and I love it!

alflavor speaks the truth

I look forward to the bargain bin sales in 4 months time and you lot all saying "Nah, I never liekd them in the first place..."

...

um, great?

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon