- Artists:
- The Men »
- Label:
- Sacred Bones Records »
Curse you the Nineties! For all the numerous joys you bestowed upon the world (Mario Kart 64, Space Jam, The Rock), your lo-fi legacy can be a complete ballache from time. Somehow a generation of bands has grown up believing it’s their moral duty to record every passing chord structure in a studio that boasts the sound quality of a Soviet oil tanker’s cargo hold. What’s good enough for Guided By Voices...
This all brings us onto The Men’s latest album, New Moon. An infuriating collection of songs, its complete disregard towards any sort of structure or cohesion is so overpowering, you’ll be baffled how the Brooklyn-based five piece cobbled their fourth record together at all. As with last year’s Open Your Heart, a multitude of influences and genres are ticked off, although that ‘Thurston Moore & the E Street Band’ tag still rings true. This tendency was previously forgivable because songs like ‘Turn It Around’ and ‘Country Song’ seemed indicative of a thrilling transformation.
Exactly 12 months on, kicking off your album with a wistful, tickling of the ivories (‘Open The Doors’) before whirling into grandiose guitar-driven regret (‘Half Angel Half Light’) rubs off as indecisive; experimentation works best when you properly commit to it. New Moon’s stuttering sequencing doesn’t help either as it judders forward without any discernible rhythm for at least six tracks. Typical of this jarring forward motion is when ‘The Brass’ and its breakneck punk theatrics immediately follow the slow-burning instrumental ‘High and Lonesome’.
If you’ve ever wondered what an abridged version of Double Nickels on the Dime would sound like, here’s your opportunity to discover how D.Boon and Mike Watt averted disaster. In the absence an extended running time, there’s no context for any track to make a lasting impression. You’ll end up steadying yourself in the maelstrom until its closing eight-minutes-long garage rock freak out (‘Supermoon’) finally subsides into silence.
Given we’re talking about The Men’s fourth record in as many years, this kind of burnout is almost to be expected. They’re hardly The Beatles or even Sebadoh. With some clear-minded editing, a workable pair of EPs could have been forged from New Moon. As it is, the cumulative effect of lumping so many competing ideas together is a mess. A frustratingly muddled mess.
Once more, Mister Leedham, I am going to have to respectfully disagree with your assessment of this record.
It has a very clear structure, for one thing. It's very literally an album of two halves, the first calling on Calexico and co for some alt-country influences as well as some solid blue-collar rocking; the second, more straight-ahead punk a la the band's first two albums, and the closer is an absolute humdinger of a psych-rock-freak-out-whoooomp-ah... I air drum the hell out of my arms whenever it's on.
It's not burnout. It IS the sound of a band in flux, and I do agree that it doesn't make for a 'complete' experience. But 4/10? Jeeesus man, let some joy into your listening.
Hello Mike,
Where you feel the album is split in halves, I find its tempo is all over the place. Admittedly, it settles down a little but into what I consider to be lesser versions of the straight-ahead punk from their previous albums.
To explain the 'burnout' comment. I feel The Men are kind of like a dog chasing its own tail on this album. They felt the need to continue their trend of churning out an album every year or so but wanted to go and experiment as well.
They couldn't have both and ended up with a very confused record. A break in this cycle to cleanse the creative process/put out a few tester EPs would have helped.
Just like you, I'm sure some people will acclimatise to New Moon's structure or even revel in the incoherence.
Obviously I didn't -> 4/10
I listened to the album.
Then I read this review. Then I listened to the album again. And I can't help but think that this review is just a mistake.
Leaving aside particular quibbles - especially the non sequitur link between lofi and incoherent track sequencing - I think the central claim ("You’ll end up steadying yourself in the maelstrom until its closing eight-minutes-long garage rock freak out (‘Supermoon’) finally subsides into silence") doesn't reflect my listening experience at all and the failing grade (4/10) seems laughably off the mark, although in some ways a strong rating (even negative) is preferable to a middling 7 for music this visceral.
I thought the comparison with the Beatles was particularly telling of the thought put into this review, as the Beatles divined the central sin New Moon is charged with, producing the original masterpiece of incoherent track sequencing and should-have-been-chopped-into-EPs-ness, the White Album. If incoherence is an inherent vice, which I would dispute, New Moon doesn't even rate on the scale that album set.
Thanks for commenting
I don't really follow with the 'not a lot of thought' remark. I mentioned Double Nickels On The Dime as a specific counterpoint to your comment. That being New Moon is 12 songs long and given a longer tracklisting, similarly to the White Album, it would work a lot better. You'd have more time to bed into the chaos as a listener.
As for the 'non sequitur link', what I actually said the link was with a habit to 'record every passing chord structure'. Wowee Zowee, Hardcore UFOs: Revelations, Sebadoh III all fit into that description. Going back to my earlier point, arguably they all work because of their longer tracklistings.
I appreciate you don't agree with the review but just because you don't agree with the opinion that doesn't mean no thought has been put into it.
I agree with this
really disappointing record
While I agree that the spastic pacing is somewhat of an issue,
I also feel that New Moon boasts some tremendous songwriting. Most of the sequencing I have acclimatized to, however, I still feel that placing "Half Angel Half Light" after "Open the Door" was a bad move. The second song undercuts the tranquil atmosphere established by the opener; perhaps that was intended, but, regardless, it is jarring.
That said, the 4/10 is overly harsh, and dismissive of some heartfelt and well-played tracks.
It's my favourite album of the year so far
I love the Men. Great gig at the Garage too. Infinitely better than the awful shacklewell arms one last year.



DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Drowned in Bristol #12
DiS Does Singles 13.05.13: Swim Deep, These New Puritans, The National
Darkstar, Ed Harcourt, Halls, Wall +more for 3 DiS-curated nights at Great Escape 2013
Interview: Frank Turner on The Olympics, The Backlash, Thatcher and Black Flag
Drowned in Nottingham #14
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article