Sign In:
Login with Facebook
86249
Type: Single Release date: 10/09/2012
Your Rating:

I was there, in 2009 when everyone was swooning-to-death over The xx. I was one of them, caught in the fleeting grip of the uncapturable, savouring the momentary luminescence. To me their debut burned with ephemerality. Each breath of each note coated with electricity, the twin voices of Oli and Romy spiralling in double-helixed coalescence. The album didn’t seem to arrive as a result of a 190-night tour of England’s cockroach venues, but neither did it seem to spring from time spent burrowed away in an expensive studio. Instead, it seemed to be the product of some grand geometrical aligment, some unrepeatable frisson that left a shimmering chiaroscuro X in its wake.

And then, I figured, like a lunar eclipse or a funny Chris Addison joke, the moment must pass, never to return. Except, turns out I was completely wrong. Turns out that their wonderful debut was merely the gateway drug, and it’s this, it’s Coexist that’s the stuff you really want. Intravenous and heavenly, this is the slow-absorption drug, the low-level hypnosis. I’ve tried to listen whilst attempting other tasks and it’s useless. It coils round you and pulls you to its depths.

But maybe, like hypnosis, you have to be suggestible to it in the first place. So perhaps some Uri Geller-style filtering is in order to usher the sceptics out the back-door. Just one question should do it really, here goes:

A) Did you like the first xx album? Y/N

If your answer is No, then there’s a (1/10) album review waiting for you out back. It’s just a bunch of songs that don’t go anywhere really, bit of sparse guitar and some token atmospherics, I mean have you heard the new Alt-J record?? (safety wink)

Otherwise, prepare yourself because Coexist is an intensely wind-torn and wounded album that cuts even deeper than its predecessor. The effortless fragility remains of course, that origami poise so embedded in the xx chromosome. So too do the male / female voices, circling each other like two swans on a still lake, neither quite daring to drop their guard. The quiet gravitas, the heavy words and weightless music, this is by no means a radical departure. Instead the band’s second album is analogous to the second series of an HBO box-set. You already know the set-up, you already know the characters, so just sit back and soak in the increasing magnitude of it all.

The clues are all in the artwork, really. Look closely at the iridescent oil-spill and you can hear the searchlight synths penetrating the mist in ’Try’, the golden liquid splashes of steel-drum ushering in ‘Reunion.’ Both of these songs reach out further than their debut, buoyed by Jamie xx’s increased confidence and musical awareness. There’s hints of Balam Acab and Mount Kimbie here, watercolour textures and rhythms that seem to lock-in to the ebbing pulse and cadences of the body. When it strips away, which it frequently does, hanging guitar notes dissipate into the night, desperate whispers fade into the numb void. And so often it is barely more than a whisper. And then you realise what even Clarkson realises, that the Testarossa’s growl is nowhere to be found in those nuts and bolts, that the magical essence of anything can never be obtained by boiling it down to its constituent parts.

It’s here then, that The xx achieve what all artists dream of, short-circuiting their brains to directly connect emotion with expression. Love and loss as synesthesia, a molten collage of sounds sparking and fizzing onto every second of every song. The timbre of Oli's voice alone is enough to invalidate any nearby pregnancy testers, but when combined with the soft arpeggiated pulse of 'Friction' or the thrumming deep-house beats of ‘Swept Away’, the effect seems almost physical.

Coexist then, is a breathtaking display of confidence from start to finish. I’m reminded of a David Byrne interview where he alludes to the mechanics of a pocket-watch when discussing his music. How you can observe each cog and spring both in isolation and interaction. The xx lay out all of their pieces beautifully. There are no extraneous parts. Not a second that they didn’t intend. As a result, songs like ‘Tides’ or ‘Chained’ unfold as naturally as a ripple of wind. And there’s the darker side too of course, as the catches in Romy’s throat portend, when your workings are so transparent, there’s precious few places to hide. "You move through the room / like breathing was easy /if someone believed me / they would be as in love with you as I am" comes the gut-punch in ‘Angels.’ It’s almost too perfect to bear.

Album Stream

crikey

having listened to it just the once so far, i was expecting a Luke-warm review.. I am yet to be convinced by the record. wonderful in parts, but a bit neither here nor there in others. i think i need some alone time with it though.

10/10?

Really?

Well I guess each to their own

but I found this album pretty bare-bones. Lacked a lot of the warmth of the first one and is just... And I hate using this word to describe an album... But... Dull. It's just so plodding and maybe I haven't listened to it enough but I just don't feel anything. It's too lacking.

Wow! Did not expect that.

But that's a great piece of writing and I'm now really excited about hearing this album. The new stuff sounded great at Primavera and I'm still of the opinion that Jamie is one of the most fascinating musical minds of the modern age. So yeah...excited for this!

I think Hayden does allude to the Marmite nature of the record fairly well

I have to say this band's music has never done anything for me at all, but this is a lovely piece of writing.

I mean fair enough, it is a well written review

but is this really a 10? no filler? dead-cert classic? perfect?

But a 10/10 rating

would have to make it one of the greatest albums of all time.

It isn't...

that's a subjective statment though

the writer cleary thinks it IS one of the greatest albums of all time

The review is excellent

Just not convinced by the score. To justify a 10/10 rating it would have to be a game changer, groundbreaking and perfect in every way, with a longevity and influence ensuring its cited by artists for decades to come.

It really doesn't fit into any of those categories!

..

By giving it a 10 I mean - this record exactly fulfills everything it intended to do, its flawless as an XX record could be (IMO etc etc), I don't think they could have done better. That's not necessarily to say that its a global gamechanger - just the record, taken it for what it is, doesn't have any fault in my eyes after hearing it a dozen times or so. I couldn't really justify why it would be a 9 rather than a 10.

Just shows how much weight people put on the number, probably equal amount as the words

the concept of 'the greatest album of all time'

always comes down some befuddled notion of popularity (most of which is built on foundations of smoke and amplified by broken mirrors).

Awesomeness is in the ear of the beholder...

Be honest.

If this was a 5/5 in Q or something, nobody would debate it. Amazing how much difference is perceived between a 9/10 and 10/10 review. IMO this is a great album, said as much on the BBC. A perfect album? It's as perfect an album as The xx have released so far. Does that make it a 10/10? For now, sure; but I've no doubt that they're capable of exceeding this effort in time. They're a band that's still developing remember. They're yet to reveal their full hand, methinks.

^^ this is true

a lot of great films get 5/5 in Empire and The Guardian. Though that doesn't suggest they're on par with Citizen Kane / Godfather

Great Review

Reads like a dream.
I don't even care what the record sounds like.

Wonderful review

I'm so excited for the album now, and I hadn't really given it much thought so far. Also, I reckon that 10/10 scores are given out too sparingly- it's unreasonable to hold a new record up to the rest of popular music history and try to decide whether it's one of the best records of all time. Completely agree with what the reviewer said about many films getting 5 stars.

I'll give it a listen now.

On the subject of 10/10s, anyone listened to that Blondes album since the first week the got it?

Such a joy to read this great review.

You've got me eagerly anticipating hearing the album!

I can really go with the whole '10/10 because it#s the best XX album that can possibly exist' theory because it's right

this album is everything I expect from an XX album in that it's perfectly mediocre

Erm.

YES. And every subsequent week.

I still listen to Blondes at least couple of times a month

Which considering I listened to it about 200 times around the time I reviewed it, it really shouldn't still deliver such pleasure.

I am actually rather shocked.

I figured this album was going to be a rehash of the first, as did many. I am pleasantly surprised that it still sounds as fresh and new as the first one despite no change of direction as such.

Not sure i agree with 10/10 though... But thats just me.

1/1

I mean, if you're gonna try and make it objective then why not do it properly. Make it truly digital.

yep

it's still ace

The LP arrived today

And on first listen I'd have to say I agree with you

also this is one of the best pieces of music writing I've ever read, kudos to you

Too Perfect to Bear?

It has a running time of 37m 12s which is the exact length of my journey to work.

10/10 for efficient use of electricity in these difficult times.

Nice work

At its hollow core, Coexist is an album about two people who seemingly no longer can.
http://ludditestereo.net/2012/09/18/coexist-the-xx-album-review/

I've been very very very very patient with this one, but...

it's getting worse with every play. Can't believe they spend that much time away only to return with such a joyless, listless, hook-free flatlining husk such as this snooze-fest. A crushing disappointment and the biggest non-event of the year so far. 10/10?! - you're kidding?...right?

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon