Sign In:
Login with Facebook
61991
Type: Album Release date: 02/08/2010
Your Rating:

A few nights ago, I decided that it would be a brilliant idea to write my review of Arcade Fire’s third album in real time. I would allot myself its not inconsiderable running length to bash out this article, whilst also, crucially, knocking back a finger of beer for each mention of “the kids” or “the suburbs” in Win Butler’s lyrics.

This was obviously a terrible plan, and none of what was written must ever see the light of day. But the one thing I learned is that “the kids” and “the suburbs” get mentioned A Lot.

And of course, you could extend the game, because The Suburbs does not mark those words' débuts in the Butler lexicon. On the band’s self-title 2003 EP, the song ‘No Cars Go’ features the lyric “us kids know”, while on the astounding ‘Vampire/Forest Fire’ - which I'm going to call the band's best song, thankyoukindly - the singer vocally yearned to “live in the suburbs”.

So what is the kinship between the Arcade Fire of 2003 and 2010? The Suburbs is undeniably a climbdown from the weapons grade bombast of Neon Bible, and this will cheer many. Tellingly, on ‘City With No Children’ Butler sings “never trust a millionaire quoting the sermon on the mount; I used to think I was not like them, but I’m beginning to have my doubts”, which you’ve got to assume is a reference of sorts to the preachiness of album number two.

Yet The Suburbs is not a reprise of the feverish spirituals of Funeral or the Arcade Fire EP, records made when the band were pretty much “kids” themselves. In 2010 their average age is around 30, and this record’s talk of youth and suburbia isn't an attempt to recreate the band they used to be, more a pointed, often painful reminder to themselves of the people they once were.

Now you’re knocking at my door, saying please come out into the night, but I would rather be alone” Butler sings on ‘We Used To Wait’, one of the faster tracks on a very measured album, its muffled guitar riff ploughing through a twinkling sea of roiling percussion and chiming harpsichords. Like much of The Suburbs it has an air of haunted nostalgia about it, abandoning Neon Bible's end-of-days vibe for something subtler, lyrics blurring the line between childhood reminisce and adult fears. Where Funeral was about the passing of innocence, The Suburbs is about looking back upon it with a wistful, sometimes frightened eye. The key lyric is this respect belongs to the aching ‘Suburban War’, where Butler intones “Now the music divides us into tribes, You grew your hair so I grew mine[...] my old friends, I can remember when you cut your hair, I never saw you again; now the cities we live in could be distant stars, and I search for you in every passing car”.

Hugely important to The Suburb’s air of reverie is its surface calmess. Virtually everything drifts along at mid-tempo, and though bombast is lessened, the sound remains thick and rich, the production – from Markus Dravs, who did the honours for Neon Bible - smooth. This may sound a little dull, but it works, partly because Arcade Fire have enough depth (and instruments) to keep things interesting, partly because they avoid self-consciously ‘stately’-sounding songs, and partly because it suits the concept - there is something fundamentally suburban about this record's unhurried, almost sedate nature.

It’s a very long record, and this mostly works to its advantage. If at times your mind starts to drift off through the nice production sheen then that's fine - there’s always another highlight waiting to rise from The Suburbs’ flat expanse and calmly sucker you: the simultaneously tiny/HUGE chorus to ‘We Used to Wait’; the stunning, early Simple Minds-esque synth line to ‘Half Light II (No Celebration)’, glowing and chugging like the workings of some celestial engine; the simple yet sinister ‘The Suburbs’ itself, a cutely chilling lullaby forged from the neuroses of Butler the boy and Butler the man. It’s not without fun moments, though: ‘Empty Room’ sounds like a more spiritual cousin to Abba’s ‘Fernando’, which is a wonderful thing. It’s one of two Regine lead vocals, the other one being ‘The Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains)’, which starts not unakin to Blondie’s ‘Heart of Glass’, but builds to something momentous and pulsing, a final cry to “quit these pretentious things and just punch the clock”, The Suburbs briefly escaping past and present to break through into raw daylight.

Of course, there is a very obvious downside to such a record. The Suburbs’ sheer expanse may be the point, but tracks like ‘The Sprawl I (Flatland)’ and ‘Modern Man’ are very qualified successes, filling space cinematically , but glassy and slightly dull when considered on their own. And the evenness in tone does mean The Suburbs lacks either the explosive, erratic magic of Funeral or the clearly defined, brilliantly coloured melodies of Neon Bible. There will be moments when you find yourself a bit bored. Would The Suburbs still work if it were pruned to its ten or 12 best songs? I doubt it’d do much damage.

In a nutshell, The Suburbs' two most important achievement are to a) be good and b) not be a rehash of its predecessors. At one point or other, we've all hoped for some sort of Funeral II. Not going to happen. But nor will there be a Neon Bible II, or The Suburbs II. To go back to 'Vampire/Forest Fire’, its very last line hinted at this band's sense of trajectory: “I'd return if I'd ever cared, but there's no interstate I find to take me there”.

Great review

Yes, a great review that rings true sat here listening to the album.

It really is starting to grow on me very quickly. Five or six listens in I fell I am only just beginning to listen to parts of it. I like it, a lot, and I am happy to be an Arcade Fire fan.

Nice review

Go out and celebrate fiddygent has complimented you.

Better then Neon Bible

but at the end of the day, bar a few songs it's just a decent album

I have to say it really did grow on me

It feels almost perverse to tell people to stick with a record in 2010, there are so many opportunities for immediate gratification, and this isn't the best album released this year, but it's very pleasurable, slightly creepy listening experience, and it really isn't bombastic, just expensively produced. The lyrics are great, too.

I think the band's biggest problem now is working out what to DO with themselves; I can't really see this being a particularly massive hit and it'd be pretty surpring if they got asked to headline anything the size of Reading/Leeds again after it... it'd be cool if they could just sink into the indie firmament and be Another Good Band, but I think Funeral (which they'll never match again, I'm sure) was too much of a mid-00s touchstone for them to every go back to the smalltime.

I think the thing about this band is that the early material is so good that everybody had hoped they'd be like The Smiths/early REM/Kraftwerk/Radiohead/whoever, just blasting out record after record that people love fanatically. Whereas I think they wound up as a good, slightly unusual indie band. Which is fine by me, really. But like I say, you might not think it's worth sticking with the record, I might have sort of shrugged it off after a couple of listens if I didn't have to review it.

"Funeral (which they'll never match again, I'm sure)"

Eurgh. let's not go down that road.

"I think the thing about this band is that the early material is so good that everybody had hoped they'd be like The Smiths/early REM/Kraftwerk/Radiohead/whoever, just blasting out record after record that people love fanatically."

I think they are probably one of those bands, to be honest. For me, anyway. At least more than any other band in the last 10 years.

Good review, by the way.

"Virtually everything drifts along at mid-tempo, and though bombast is lessened, the sound remains thick and rich, the production ... smooth"

Oh, no! ):

Still, I wasn't even really planning on listening to it, so I can't claim to be disappointed by this news.

That quote could easily describe Phil Collins.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Their best so far, and the best of 2010, so far...

I disagree with the review. Lyrically, thematically, musically it's their most accomplished. I haven't heard a record that was so perfectly sequenced, and completely captivating throughout (which is something, considering it's length) in a long time. I've read the 'their OK Computer' reviews, and while being a little hurried, I can see where that opinion is coming from. I love the recurring themes, and the self reference. It plays out like a novel, and leaves me with the same feeling as something like 'The Virgin Suicides,' or,' The Ice Storm.' Anyone know what I'm talking about?

I had low expectations after hearing the advance singles

and then something strange happened: the album is brilliantly paced, and there's a synergy that makes pretty good songs into really good songs. And there's five-star songs like City with No Children and Suburban War. Nice review, Lukowski. me=8.5/10

If DiS did 8.5's, this is it. Great record. 2010 is amazing for music :)

Yay to the Vampire/Forest Fire mention

It's almost like the touchpoint to this album. Which is GREAT btw. yes,its probably a few tracks too long but, and this will sound like heresy, there's been dead wood on all of their albums to date.

AF's problem, if they have any, is that they got big too quickly. They're not necessarily going to be massive and they probably shouldn't be - and clearly all their really big crowd pleasing songs date from Funeral. But thats no bad thing, and the key point is that The Suburbs is a good enough album not to blow what has come before.

Radiohead may be the biggest reference to where they do go from here, though. That's also a band that will never release a big hit again, with no inclination to, but they have established themselves sufficiently not to need to. The Suburbs is no fan-scaring Kid A, so even if they never get as pop again, they can still maintain their consistency.

Not that it matters, since it is all still great music.

I don't think it gets away with staying at midtempo at all

I like a lot of individual songs but god I can't get through the album as a whole, it's such a slog it bores the hell out of me. I wasn't looking for a repeat of funeral but not even sure I prefer this to Neon Bible even if it is a step in the right direction from it.

Is it just me or is Ready to Start very similar to Keep the Car Running, in vocal melody at the very least.

I dunno it's grown on me but it feels like I'm a year closer to death each time I listen to it, it's way too long and way too samey throughout it never feels like it's going anywhere, there is lovely music there but it's buried under layers of muffled guitars and not in a good my bloody valentine way.

We Used to Wait is great, all the songs when the female vocalist (name temporarily escapes me) tend to be pretty nice but god...I am going to die of old age before I can sit through it all the way again.

So badly needs and editor and a producer who would tell them to make 3 minute songs or ones that go at a higher tempo at least, and this is a weird complaint from me of all people

I don't think it gets away with staying at midtempo at all

I like a lot of individual songs but god I can't get through the album as a whole, it's such a slog it bores the hell out of me. I wasn't looking for a repeat of funeral but not even sure I prefer this to Neon Bible even if it is a step in the right direction from it.

Is it just me or is Ready to Start very similar to Keep the Car Running, in vocal melody at the very least.

I dunno it's grown on me but it feels like I'm a year closer to death each time I listen to it, it's way too long and way too samey throughout it never feels like it's going anywhere, there is lovely music there but it's buried under layers of muffled guitars and not in a good my bloody valentine way.

We Used to Wait is great, all the songs when the female vocalist (name temporarily escapes me) tend to be pretty nice but god...I am going to die of old age before I can sit through it all the way again.

So badly needs and editor and a producer who would tell them to make 3 minute songs or ones that go at a higher tempo at least, and this is a weird complaint from me of all people

ooops

apology for the double post

Love the album

I love the album. It was a grower. If you dont like it at the first listen, try listening to it a few more times. It will grow on you, well at least it grew on me. Best of 2010 this year.

Agree with the review

Pretty much spot on after two listens tonight for me. I don't know if my attention span has been given a kick thansk to Joanna Newsoms triple LP this but I don't have any problem sticking with this albu for the duration. Although I have always insisted that the ideal album length is 45-50 minutes long, I'm finding it quite refreshing to have an album that needs digesting, sounds greater than the sum of its parts, and isn't punctuated by cheap thrills.

As the reviewer notes, this albu succeeds in being good in its own right and not being like either of its predecessors. I think the Arcade Fire have given themselves a chance at some longevity in this record.

Agree with the review

Pretty much spot on after two listens tonight for me. I don't know if my attention span has been given a kick thansk to Joanna Newsoms triple LP this but I don't have any problem sticking with this albu for the duration. Although I have always insisted that the ideal album length is 45-50 minutes long, I'm finding it quite refreshing to have an album that needs digesting, sounds greater than the sum of its parts, and isn't punctuated by cheap thrills.

As the reviewer notes, this albu succeeds in being good in its own right and not being like either of its predecessors. I think the Arcade Fire have given themselves a chance at some longevity in this record.

Agree with the review

Pretty much spot on after two listens tonight for me. I don't know if my attention span has been given a kick thansk to Joanna Newsoms triple LP this but I don't have any problem sticking with this albu for the duration. Although I have always insisted that the ideal album length is 45-50 minutes long, I'm finding it quite refreshing to have an album that needs digesting, sounds greater than the sum of its parts, and isn't punctuated by cheap thrills.

As the reviewer notes, this albu succeeds in being good in its own right and not being like either of its predecessors. I think the Arcade Fire have given themselves a chance at some longevity in this record.

For Slovak & Czech readers might be interesting also my review of 'The Suburbs' published on my blog page :)
http://slaninka.blog.sme.sk/c/240874/Arcade-FireVelke-slova-sucasnych-kralov-indie-rocku.html

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon