Sign In:
Login with Facebook
60656
Type: Album Release date: 28/06/2010
Your Rating:

This just in: Spencer Krug, he of Sunset Rubdown, is collaborating with the Handsome Furs’ Dan Boeckner. Did someone say CANADIAN INDIE SUPERGROUP? Hell yes: somebody who used to be in Hot Hot Heat is on guitar... HOT DAMN. ‘Wolf Parade’, as they’re calling themselves, should be an experiment to remember.

Ha ha ha. The point is, though, that while Wolf Parade’s magnificent Apologies to the Queen Mary offered most of us our first real taste of Krug and Boeckner’s formidably idiosyncratic songwriting gifts, the intervening five years have seen but one other Wolf Parade album, 2008’s good-but-not-great At Mount Zoomer. This frankly leisurely state of affairs is rather put into perspective by the volume of releases issuing from the psychotically industrious Krug’s other projects (one does wonder if the little guy ever just kicks back with a beer); with Boeckner having whipped out a brace of Handsome Furs LPs in fairly short order, nobody’s really kidding themselves that either songwriter regards Wolf Parade as ‘the day job’. So in a sense they possibly deserve some sort of small prize for being the first band to actually achieve indie supergroup status retrospectively.

Which is a bit odd, but the thing is, it takes the pressure off. Even back in 2008, Wolf Parade felt so much more significant – and was at the very least so much more popular - than its related bands that At Mount Zoomer felt like a letdown after the three year wait. Since then Sunset Rubdown’s star in particular has ascended dramatically; it’s hard to imagine that many people listened to last year’s magnificent Dragonslayer and thought ‘oh REALLY Spencer, stop farting around with these brilliant melodies plus lyrics’.

So here comes Wolf Parade album number three, Expo 86, and this time its appearance feels more nice surprise than climax of an agonising wait. Indeed, first track ‘Cloud Shadow on the Mountain’ literally materialises out of nothing, no intro, no preamble, just Krug suddenly wandering up behind you and nervously jabbering “I was asleep in a hammock, I was dreaming that I was the web, I was a dreamcatcher hanging in the window of a minivan parked along the water’s edge”. He sounds like some autistic drifter barking out his inner monologue, while Arlen Thompson drily batters the shit out of a drum in the background. As what sounds like an entire different, equally raucous song starts playing at the same time, later sheared into by ominous yawns of guitar, you do remember how gloriously arty Wolf Parade can be. There’s a dissonant menace, an out-and-out weirdness here that Sunset Rubdown don’y have (even if the rapid-fire “oh oh oh oh, never be born as a scor-pi-an” coda could have come from any their albums).

Then it’s onto the Boeckner-sung ‘Palm Road’, which pretty swiftly preps you for Expo 86’s biggest weakness, namely that Krug’s co-pilot isn’t quite the man he used to be. Sure, one’s pulse picks up a couple of BPMs as Boeckner hollers about how “they turned the lights down low on Palm Road” as if this was A Really Bad Thing. But compare his vocal to the hernia-inducing levels of man passion he broke out on ‘Modern World’ or ‘This Heart’s on Fire’... it just lacks that vigour. Not that the dizzying scrabble of its ending isn’t wonderful, and not that he doesn’t knock a few zingers out elsewhere (‘Ghost Pressure’s affecting gothtronica is a case in point), and not that you should point too many fingers when musically the songs are co-writes. But the Boeckner-led bits just don’t quite stack up against the ominous metronomic chug of Krug’s ‘What Did My Lover Say? (It Always Had to Go This Way)’, or the hungrily lapping keyboards that glug around ‘In the Direction of the Moon’, shaking and probing and roaring and eventually condensing into a icy dance of light. And even then there’s little that seriously rivals ‘You Are a Runner and I Am My Father's Son’ or ‘Grounds for Divorce’ or, indeed, much off Dragonslayer.

But it’s still good. Expo 86 is good, it’s just not great. Wolf Parade, the 2010 model, are good, not great. Its two leaders – Krug especially – have written some good songs, but now most of their great songs go elsewhere. Still, y’know... fuck it. They don’t have to do this shit. Well, maybe the drummer and the guy who used to be in Hot Hot Heat do. But the point is, nobody really needs Wolf Parade these days and shorn of that expectation, it's hard not to heartily enjoy these occasional returns.

*I* need Wolf Parade

hmmm... review's not good enough

I think we all need to get over Apologies... really great record, but this album is, like Mt Zoomer is a rollercoaster ride, perhaps not in the usual indie rock zeitgeist of the 90s that we all look for in records, not everything can just sound like modest mouse. As we see in Sunset Rubdown/Swan Lake Krug is a great modern prog writer and Boeckner a great pop song writer in Handsome Furs. What Wolf Parade allows is a brilliant set of songs that tone down the slight overeccentricities of Krug for really heavy stompers (Black Swan sounds like a wolf parade song to me) and Boeckner is allowed to bring out his Tom Petty/Springsteen Heartland rock. What Expo 86 is is a wonderful collection of songs that you'll want to see live, any track. Yulia and Golden Age are as anthemic as This Heart's On Fire and In The Direction of the Moon is probably better than a lot of Apologies. This album is something I'd put on when i'm in the house on my own wanting to play my guitar along to as loud as possible, Mt Zoomer is a really great album too, to see WP's darker side of writing, Apologies seems dated compared to the last two efforts. Sorry.

2008’s good-but-great

my mind just blew

oop

I'm sure you're right about the live shows

(though not sure what you mean about Apologies... sounding dated), but the fact is Boeckner's vocals on this record just don't stack up against those early ones - you can't really excuse him on grounds of how it sounds live..!

Score's too low.

I don't know how many listens you've given this album, but it's a grower. I agree that it probably lacks a standout, but it's more consistent and, I think, ultimately more satisfying than Apologies. At Mount Zoomer was the same, it took me ages to really get into that but it was worth putting in the time. It seems weird to say it now, but I think Apologies is my least favourite WP record by a distance.

As for Dan not being what he used to be - funnily enough, I think that's the exact opposite of what all the WP fans are saying. Yulia and Pobody's Nerfect in particular are great.

Reviewing the Review

A rather lazy analysis, no? Let's look at the text.

Paragraph 1-2: A joke about how members of the band are/were members of other prolific bands, followed by a reflection upon said joke. A pretty trite intro, one that you'll find beginning every other canned WP review. We get the joke; it doesn't need telling, let alone explanation in paragraph 2.

Paragraph 3: Let me ask: what does it mean to say that a band felt much more significant in 2008 than it does now? Is the music no longer fresh? No longer innovative? If so, maybe the thing to do is to come out and say as much, rather than rattle off something about "felt significance." To whom is the music significant, or less so over time? Music critics? Music critics who parrot memes that show up on any other random indie music blog? This bit is just fluff, plain and simple.

Paragraph 4: We're finally getting somewhere--an actual analysis of some music. Unfortunately, the review is not advanced by poorly thought out analogies. Tell me, what does "He sounds like some autistic drifter barking out his inner monologue" actually mean? It sounds to me that this is trying a bit hard; maybe metaphors should be left to the artists, unless of course they actually contribute to the advancement of what their employers are trying to say. Here's a tip: figure out what you're trying to say, and then add the metaphor later.

Paragraph 5: Dan Boekner is not the songwriter/vocalist he once was. Snarky, gratuitous capitalization to make a point? I think I've seen that trick before. Not very clever.

Paragraph 6: We're on to a summary of the opinion, here (Already? But the review has just begun!) Good, but not great. Not much depth to that, huh?

This review is neither original in its delivery, nor in much of its content. What is unique to it is a couple of metaphors that seem cooked up right from a book of Mad Libs (e.g. "the hungrily lapping keyboards that glug around ‘In the Direction of the Moon’, shaking and probing and roaring and eventually condensing into a icy dance of light." That's a doozy.). We are 306 words in before any criticism begins, and then it's only 365 words before we're out--that is, into "It's good, not great" territory. This is not the sort of review to read if you are interested in substance.

Perhaps the autistic drifter has something to add?

Jesus Christ.

Get off the internet mate.

they really do!

he's grown up, we've all grown up, his voice is more soulful and more assured

This is Spencer kicking back with a beer, surely?

...literally, in a minivan by a lake. Plus, Dan's on fine form; in fact, some of these are the best songs he's ever written.

True, I can't dispute Andrzej's sense of slight frustration that Wolf Parade aren't re-inventing the wheel, but that shouldn't distract from the simple question of whether this would be good by anyone else's standards, and 3 albums between 2005-2010 is fairly normal for a band touring the world, let alone making multiple side-projects, No?

As a rabid fan of the whole damn Axis of Krug/Mercer/Boeckner/Bejar, I respect Wolf Parade's simple formula: 2 songwriters means more energy, more ideas, but less pressure. Result: shows that are more enjoyable than just about anything comparable; albums likewise, albeit not as cerebral as the rest of the aforementioned axis.

Production-wise, everything's a bit bigger on this record. As usual, SK holds back a little on his lyrics, by comparison with SunRub, Swan Lake, Moonface - here's he's self-consciously trying to be more of a bloke than ever, and that's mostly good (with one dud). Personally, I laaaaahved "Kissing the Beehive", so I'm missing it's equivalent here, but that's their prerogative. The (optional) fallback for WP lyrics - crib classic pop lyrics and imbue them with new meaning - is less evident here, but that doesn't matter either, because it's immediately accessible nostalgia. All told, one of the most fun records of the year; sadly not a 9 like "Mt Zoomer", but an 8, easily.

Reviewing the review of the review

Paragraph 4: "He sounds like some autistic drifter barking out his inner monologue" is a simile not a metaphor.

Reviewing the review of the review of the review

"METAPHOR. In RHETORIC, a figure with two senses, both originating with Aristotle in the 4c BC: (1) All FIGURES OF SPEECH that achieve their effect through association, comparison, and resemblance. Figures like ANTITHESIS, HYPERBOLE, METONYMY, SIMILE are all species of metaphor." - From "METAPHOR," Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language. Ed. Tom McArthur. Oxford University Press, 1998. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. 29 June 2010 <http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&amp;entry=t29.e778&gt;

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon