Sign In:
Login with Facebook
58232
Type: Album Release date: 22/03/2010
Your Rating:

Of the many illogical and semi-specious rules that dictate musical taste, one of the biggies is that if an artist changes their sound then someone, somewhere will definitely praise them for it. Now, we could get into a big semantic kerfuffle on the whys and the wherefores of that statement, but let’s cut to the chase re: Goldfrapp. While the mid-Noughties commercial heyday of Black Cherry and Supernature saw them stabilise and grow into a sort of vaguely kinky electro-glam Seventies affair, the duo's reputation amongst their broadsheet-ish fanbase now substantially rests on a penchant for reinvention. The aforementioned records are bookended by two starkly contrasting sets: a witchy trip hop debut (2000’s Felt Mountain) and a veer into pastoral folk (2008’s Seventh Tree). Both those transformations were comparatively unexpected: with fifth set Head First there has been a certain critical consensus that change is the duo’s raison d’être, this being the inevitable point where Alison Goldfrapp and that other one tick off Eighties pop on their checklist of genres to do before they die.

But really, what does it all add up to? To somewhat lazily cite Bowie, it’s reasonably clear that for all the chopping, changing and pilfering at play in his career, he was clearly breaking an awful lot of ground, doing it very well, and doing it in a manner that was characteristically Bowie-esque. Goldfrapp, on the other hand, have never made a genre defining, classic, or even, really, particularly distinct record (or if they have, it was Felt Mountain, an album whose hallmark was the lushly weird treatments Ms Goldfrapp applied to her vocals, a technique long since dumped). Yet their capacity for change continues to win them remarkable levels of attention: a search for their name on the ‘Frappian bastion that is the Guardian website reveals they were mentioned in 86 articles in 2008, and already ten this month (two being blogs about their latest sound).

Essentially what I’m getting at is that Goldfrapp are very good at remaining a talking point, yet ironically it increasingly comes at the expense of actual personality. Of course, it takes a bit extra to set tongues a wagging, and Head First benefits from having a superb lead single, the lissom pop of ‘Rocket’, all punchy Miami Vice synths and an entirely delightful chorus, one that wears its disgruntled sentiment (“oh-oh-oh, I’ve got a rocket, oh-oh-oh, you’re going on it, oh-oh-oh, you’re never coming back”) with such wholesome breeziness that it’s hard to see it as being in any way arch. A great tune will overcome any malaise, but ‘Rocket’ is Head First’s only 24 carat moment. Elsewhere there are plenty of solid ones: the strident ‘I Wanna Life’ stands out in particular, worthy of Kylie’s Stock, Aitken & Waterman peak, but also the absurdly sprightly FM pop of ‘Alive’ (is ‘breakfast rock’ a genre? It should be) and the chastely foxy ‘Dreaming’; but really it is a question of decent, not great. That it does a pretty solid job of unironically synthesising SAW-style guilty pleasure pop with the rawer keys of the earlier new romantics makes for a reasonably impressive achievement, and if this was a debut album you’d probably peg the duo as La Roux’s scrappier, more entertaining younger siblings.

They are, I suppose, one of the bigger bands in the country. Alison Goldfrapp’s face is staring at me coquettishly from the front sleeve, as it does from all their front sleeves, and she gets interviewed quite a lot, which I guess means she’s pretty famous. I was asked to sign a faintly ominous release form promising not to divulge anything about the contents of Head First too far in advance, which presumably means that somewhere there are people chomping at the bit to find out what lies herein. But I have to say I don’t get it: as Goldfrapp make another proficient genre hop, it simply feels like they’re failing to consolidate their last bout of proficiency. They've moved on, changed their sound, and it's just okay... again. They’re not broadening their mystique, but stretching it to translucence.

this is my problem with Goldfrapp in a nutshell

kudos. for someone who has an awful lot of interesting things to say, none of it is ever in the music. like the anti-Bat For Lashes!

Great review.

Hit the nail right on the head about this band. Its almost like this release should’ve been inserted in between Supernature and Seventh Tree.

"Of the many illogical and semi-specious rules that dictate musical taste,

one of the biggies is that if an artist changes their sound then someone, somewhere will definitely praise them for it."

On the other hand, one of the more illogical and specious rules is that there's always some whinnying idiot that would rather promote stagnation.

I've come to dread DiS Goldfrapp reviews. This one is no exception. Goldfrapp's sound may change, but the reviews don't seem to.

I'm a big fan but have to agree with 5/10

its an inspid album that doesn't really every get going or find it's voice. Disappointing...

This review totally nails the problems I have with the 'frapp.

I think with Goldfrapp, the changes from album to album are too clunky and forced. There's nothing wrong with change, in fact I like it when bands subtly evolve over time. But with Goldfrapp, I never really get the feeling that they care that passionately about the genres they try on for size. It's just stylistic box-ticking, and usually coincides with a general upswing in interest in the particular genre they adopt for each album.

'breakfast rock'

amazing

If 5 is based on Rocket alone it is quite generous

I've avoided Rocket and Head First like the plague before this review and I am listening to Rocket the first time around and I am thinking someone robbed Ladyhawke. I can't quite decide whether she should feel honoured or top herself.

A band who doesn't evolve so much as

but like an indecisive school girl switches between outfits to match what's currently in and wouldn't dare be caught in the same thing twice.

And each time they do this it seems more forced and distant from the bands actual scope thus meaning each time it gets blander and more transparent.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon