Sign In:
53366
Type: Album Release date: 21/09/2009
Your Rating:

If they've never exactly been fashionable, Pearl Jam have always been on better terms with the UK than received wisdom would have it. Though Ten’s naffer excesses were oft used as a stick with which to beat the band – generally to the flattery of Nirvana or the Britpop acts – the fact that exactly the same ‘throwback bores’ argument was trotted out in the face of the savage Vs and unhinged Vitalogy probably indicates that there was no real dislike for those records, more the actual idea of Pearl Jam.

Once Britpop had finally sloped off (though not before taking the almighty shit in the bathroom that was the Stereophonics) we were all good to go: 2000’s Binaural was accompanied by glowing reviews, the band’s first full UK arena tour, and such articles as this excellent, thoughtful interview with NME’s John Mulvey.

Okay, it didn't really last, for which the agonised Riot Act and the distraction of the (ahem) New Rock Revolution can most likely be blamed. But the fact is that general critical acceptance of the band has been on the cards for an age. Sniffing the upbeat press and general goodwill around Backspacer and it would appear it's finally happening for real.

Which is fine and all, but um, yeah... shame it’s not one of their best records. Out goes the seething emotion and hard-fought musical builds of yore. In comes the first set of straight down the line pop songs Eddie Vedder and co have ever written. Fortunately, they're not the shabby kind.

Backspacer commences with ‘Gonna See My Friend’s twangy rollick’n’roll, easily the giddiest opening track on any Pearl Jam record. While Vedder’s lyrics would seem to be a fairly gloomy channelling of a junkie’s lusts – “I'm gonna see my friend for what I require ... I'm sick of everything, I'm gonna see my friend, make it go away” - his borderline ecstatic delivery is such that one can’t help but interpret the actual sentiment as “yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-haaaaaaaaw!” It's good, and the next three songs are frickin’ sublime. ‘Got Some’ cruises in on an ultra-tight new wave guitar figure, Vedder flipping his softened, almost adolescent voice through the catchiest vocal hook of his career – “every NIGHT with the light ON where you GONE? WHAT’s wrong?” The lyric would appear to be the flipside to ‘See My Friend’ – Vedder is the one dispensing the relief – but again, it doesn’t feel like there’s any darkness here, just a glorious burst of pop-rock, delightfully in love with its own momentum. ‘The Fixer’ offers a third track on the same theme; once more, the name suggests something untoward or seedy, but the music's life-crackling surge and lines as blessedly optimistic as “If there's no love, I wanna try to love again” says otherwise. ‘Johnny Guitar’ offers more deliriously flip rock pop, almost to the point of pastiche, Vedder casting himself as a lovelorn horndog who finds himself thwarted in his love of “the girl in red so innocent” by the eponymous lothario.

Indeed, stylistically and lyrically Backspacer would seem to consist of the songs Vedder might have written as a teenager had he been less monumentally fucked up at the time, with the band drawing heavily on the pop of both their youths and their parents’ before them – certainly ‘Last Kiss’ now seems way less anomalous.

You may miss the full-force guitars and the molten eruption of Vedder’s wounded soul, but we’ve had plenty of that before, and a lot of Backspacer is a lot of fun. A shame, then, that they’ve kind of messed up the quieter songs, which dominate the record's second half.

Pearl Jam’s gravitas – musically and lyrically – has enabled them to write some of the more affecting ballads and lullabies of recent times: ‘I Am Mine’, ‘Wishlist’, Nothingman’, ‘Better Man’, ‘Daughter’. Though Backspacer's only actively excruciating note is the beardy folk ramble of ‘Just Breathe’, the likes of ‘Unknown Thought’ and ‘Speed Of Sound’ feel sapped by the record's lightness; it's fairly self-evident that these tracks would have sounded better if recorded at literally any other time in Pearl Jam's history. The occasional presence of an orchestra is just bewildering: this is a band that reaches their emotional highs through blood, sweat and tears, not symphonic gimmicks.

Still, if Vedder's once inferno-like angst really has subsided, it's entirely to him and his band's credit that they've diverted their energies elsewhere. Backspacer is defined by its opening salvo of choons, a joyous fusillade that seems likely to finally finally finally put the band's rock dinosaur rep to bed. It’s the long-term implications that are more worrying: there are weak songs here, and they’re weak because they lack qualities Pearl Jam used to possess in rough hewn spades. Still, Backspacer is very much calculated to sound the way it sounds, and suggesting Pearl Jam have lost anything would be premature. Ultimately there’s no point fretting about the future when contemplating a record that’s so very much a celebration of the moment.

Huh

I got their greatest hits album, a few years ago when I was going through my grunge phase (10 years too late), but I really didn't like it. It just depressed me. Dinosaur jr and Nirvana were where it was at.

But maybe... I'll check this out. Maybe...

Don't bother

Seriously. If you couldn't get into them through that Greatest Hits (which was rammed with classics) then I strongly doubt this new one will do the trick. Not that it's a bad album - I'd say it's the best thing they've released in over a decade. 'Got Some' is a tune.

Beating a dead horse

...I maybe, but any of their fans that really believe they're not directly responsible for Creed, Nickelback, et al are kidding themselves. They absolutely pioneered the I'm-so-earnest-feel-my-pain-with-these-big-commercial-rock-songs schtik and whatever they came up with after really doesn't change that. In fairness they're one of those bands I haven't delved into very deeply, because I know I just won't get it, but that voice makes my brain try to escape through my ears and nearly ruined Into The Wild, which is otherwise awesome.

You started off talking nonsense

and things only got worse from there. My personal favourite bit was where you completely (and voluntarily, without provocation) rendered your own argument null and void. I'm talking about this bit here, see: "In fairness they're one of those bands I haven't delved into very deeply, because I know I just won't get it". That bit was CLASSIC. Thanks for doing all my work for me. Right, who's next?

You don't have to

trawl through every b-side to know you don't like something. They play Kasabian 48 times a day on the radio for the sole purpose of reminding me that I never have to stream a single track to see what I'm 'missing'.

"In comes the first set

of straight down the line pop songs Eddie Vedder and co have ever written."

^ Obviously never heard Yield.

Sorry

I misinterpreted "haven't delved into very deeply" as "I haven't paid attention to most of what they've done since 1993 and only really know the singles off of Ten...y'know...the ones where he sings in that exaggerated barritone and wears flannel in the videos", rather than the altogether more obvious "I'm not familiar with all their b-sides". My mistake - you're clearly qualified to make those judgments.....carry on.

They can not really be blamed for the copyists though...

shirley?

Personally, I am loving the album so far, and consider Just Breathe to be the best track on there. Far from the "actively excruciating note (of) beardy folk rambl(ing)" the reviewer hears.

It needs more listening time to really put it into context of their history, but on the first couple of listens i am not disappointed.

I also consider the two free concert downloads to be an extremely generous gesture...

I've never had a PJ record, but I've always sorta liked them

But somehow shilling for Target, a US dept store, seems hypocritical.

They *do* sound like Nickelback and Creed, which somehow must make PJ even better, considering how close they get to that dogshit everytime they sit down to write a song.

Where they once shilled for Epic Records

they now shill for Target.

I spend a lot of time defending this band on these boards, and I can't be bothered making the same points again and again, so here's an oldie...
http://drownedinsound.com/community/boards/music/4160740

disagree that Yield is a pop album

It's an accessible, melodic record, but I wouldn't say anything is written in the pop song/rock'n'roll 7-inch idiom in the way that much of Backspacer is. Not counting 'Last Kiss', I'd probably say the only real pop song they've put out prior to this record is 'Mankind' off No Code.

I hate this arguement

It's idiotic, how can a band possibly be responsible for other shit bands that copy them? Nickleback may never have had an original idea of their own, but how is that Pearl Jam's fault?

Mankind is so awesome

I'm looking forward to this so much. Roll on payday. Got Some is so fucking good.

Good interview link

never seen this before, thanks.

I think its a fucking good record

and I am fan. I went off them for a while in the mid to late 90s but I regained my faith in them. I dont care if loads of poseurs on here who drink in the Cat and Mutton dislike them, i think they are ace and I don't give a flying fuck if people like Tom Edwards don't like them. If you'd rather cut your ears off then listem to them, please do.

I think this is a rather....

stupid argument. You either like a band or you don't. I see all the points which this band's defenders make but that still does not make me dig it. If you enjoy it, good for you but that does not mean others can't voice their opinion.

It's not so much 'the not digging it' that grates y'see....

No - what grates is the tired, worn out, cliched reasons these people tend to give. A constructive argument regarding the quality of the music I can accept - and, yeah, they're definitely not going to appeal to everybody in that respect, to say the least.

I do think (and I tried to say this in my review of the reissue)

that some of those argument are legitimate with regards Ten.

But I find it endlessly frustrating that Ten is even heralded as a particularly representative album. I mean, obviously it's their best-selling album and it's not like they don't play the songs still, but applying that Nickelback-influencing argument to the following seven (now eight) albums is just ridiculous. Vs, Vitalogy and No Code in particular are utterly counter to the stereotype of their sound, but none of their records really sound anything like Ten.

The trouble is that it's not really as clear-cut as non-fans of the band don't 'understand' them - I know people who consider themselves Pearl Jam fans who think Ten's their only really good record. You're basically a bit damned if do, damned if you don't being a fan of this band, but it's probably not really worth worrying about. If Vs had been their debut I think they'd be looked upon almost exponentially differently, but then again Ten made them stars, etc etc...

I suppose...

People who do not like a particular band cannot be expected to come out with "valid" or "genuine" reasons all the time to support their dislike. Why should I be bothered about developing a "constructive argument" acceptable to a band's defenders, for a band that I don't care about in the first place? Anyway, you yourself say that they are not for everyone so I, frankly, do not see what the problem is.

I have a friend who hates Oasis with a passion.

He hates Oasis because he considers them to be derivative, unimaginative bores who string the same four open chords together ad infinitum. He also thinks their lyrics are consistently shit, and Liam's singing is like running fingernails down a blackboard to him. Fair enough.

He does not dislike Oasis because of Kasabian or The Enemy. That would just be plain silly of him.

Great album, shame about the comments on here....

People like Tom edwards and oceanrain obviously have no clue about music if they think PJ sound anything like Creed or nickleback. yes PJ may have inspired those musicians to play music, but those bands brand of rock is very different.

Bands like creed and Nickleback have a much more metal influence to their sound. Is it PJs fault that these much much poorer quality bands get airplay? No its the stupid labels that are always looking for their way to make money by finding a band that will sell to the masses off the back of an inovator. Their sound is much more commercial than PJs (don't try and tell me PJ are a commercial sounding band as you'll embarrass yourselves even more)

This is their best album since ten, if not the best. Its powerful and emotive and dare I say tear jerking at times.

At the end of the day, fuck the music snobs. PJ = biggest cult band in the world, this album deserves to be in all the top ten album lists at the end of the year.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon