Sign In:
Login with Facebook
31858
Type: Album Release date: 10/12/2007
Your Rating:

Luke Leighfield, it's really hard to like you. You are the sort of artist whose fans are likely to be dismissive and unbearably militant and defensive when they're told that you're actually not all that good. You've got a lot going for you, though. You're a talented young man, but you rely so unbearably heavily on your influences and the assumption from most people that you're quite unique among your contemporaries (who you sweetly thank in the liner notes) that it's difficult to be more motivated about singing your limited praises.

It's not the intention to be hurtful, it's actually necessary. And fear not, this review will revert to an indirect description instead of a direct appraisal soon enough. Hard stuff first, evidence in a minute. And a change of perspective. Fan The Flames contains no little skill and cheek, but it's the kind of skill and cheek that would have been inventive had some of the most skilful, cheeky, respected, famous and inventive names in popular music had been taking the same flight and been flown into a wall. As a work, it has no regard for authenticity of expression, inventiveness of arrangement (outside of the artist's immediate peers, anyhow) or anything that resembles a truly memorable tune. And that is very, very important to this sort of record.

Belle & Sebastian, Brian Wilson, Paul McCartney, Kate Nash, The Delgados, Hefner, David Gedge, Camera Obscura, Teenage Fanclub and Neutral Milk Hotel… is how a list of artists who render Luke Leighfield pointless might begin. While that's an extremely crude and childish way to make a point, it is difficult to care when you hear a lyric like “my lyrics are simple, you know what I mean / nothing's clouded in metaphor so you're looking straight at me” delivered with such idiocy and naivety. And the “clouded” simile is pretty close anyway. Are you scared they won't crack your code, Luke? Naivety itself is not a bad thing at all, but when it's delivered with such a smart-arse hint that Leighfield actually could, if he wanted, deliver much more complex lines, it becomes utterly disgusting. Naivety only works when it's genuine, not when you let on that you know you're cleverer than that. Arrogance rather than innocence is what we're given.

What the press release claims is 'extravagant' instrumentation should more accurately be labelled 'functional'. No subtlety further than extreme volume and extreme quiet is employed, and the instrumental arrangements themselves are terribly simplistic. Most people make the mistake of assuming the genius of Pet Sounds (another crude example to serve a simple point, please stay with it) lies within the range of instrumentation, but it really resides in the way that Brian Wilson used his instruments to give life to his already inventive chord progressions. Conversely and, again, crudely, the arrangements of Fan The Flames could be described as the 'you can't polish a turd' maxim. The turd of his leaden base material is by no means redeemed by the cleansing wipe of equally leaden extraneous instrumentation. It's all ineffective, self-referential suspensions and held strings over basslines dreamt up in the cotton fields of the Great Depression.

Already, too many words have been written about this record. Have three points, and only because a lot of wasted effort went into recording it. Join a band and play someone else's songs, Luke Leighfield.

Harsh!

Its no 'All My Friends', is it Dan?

Burn!

Looks like I got owned. Who are you going to give the CD to Daniel?

you can

give me the CD, i still haven't bought it yet (maybe soon, luke)

Del

I'm sure I can fix you up with one still in the shiny wrapping. You did buy me pizza last time we met after all.

"over 11,000 friends"

What a genuine measure of talent. Thank fuck for this review (particularly the comments about the naive lyrics), I was beginning to think I was alone in disliking his music round here.

Luke Leighfield

<3..and that.

'Daniel Ross Vs. The fan'

would undoubtedlty be hilarious, if only because some of his fans can't seem to grasp what a review is...

this review=

ridiculous and i agree with most of what unefleurviolet says'.

this albums great good clean pop fun.

no doubt about it.

and lukes lovely.

sincerly, disgruntled fan.

perhaps when signing up for accounts

a bit of guidance might be offered by DiS, saying something like "if you sign up just to defend an artist who's recieved a bad review/bad press, don't. it will only make you look silly and make it look like the artist has retard fans." or words to that effect

hahaahahahah

'so no music can be truly original'

chin up bwoy

hmmm

I don't disagree with reviews which give their opinion on if an artist really shouldn't bother trying for various reasons. I think making your point a bit too much, showing you can make it in so many different words and sentences is unecessary. Unless you want to work for the NME

i dont like luke leighfield

cos he has a self run fan club.

just realised

This is the reviewer, DANIEL ROSS who reviewed Paul Marshall's album, one of the shittest and most incorrect reviews on DrownedinSound. Ignore this review and listen to Luke Leighfield's music and make a judgement yourself. But dont listen to one word of this pointless, personal attack. Man up daniel and dont be so fucking immature. Shit reviews like this and paul marshall's is what is taking me and so many other people away from this site which was once good and is now just an excuse to slate something to pointless heights.

the worst thing about this review is this:

Belle & Sebastian... The Delgados, Hefner... Camera Obscura, Teenage Fanclub

these are bands I love and in no fucking way is Luke leighfield either comparible or a patch on any of them.

other than that

sorry, its a really good review.
the first paragraph especially, hits nail on head.

after reading this review again..

I enjoyed it,and I think it's not as bad as it sounds. He accepts his talent and in a very crude tone is encouraging Luke to think more forwardly. Anyway, I think this record would have been so much more successful if it was actually produced well. I can't take the awful balance and the snare drum gives me a headache. And the whole record sounds really tinny. Sort all this out on the next album and hopefully for the single and he'll be on his way. For a style which is so easy to hate or conversely, hard to like (at first) - presentation and delivery of the music is essential. Failing this, there really will be no hope.

P.s. I really wanted to hate Luke's music too. When I first heard it I thought it was so boring and unoriginal and thought it was the kind of music that wasn't going to get me any fit girls, so I slammed it. But after more listens (obligatory - after going on tour with him) I got to love it. I don't know whether this makes a good or bad record. I'd ultimately say good, but for the modern consumer, this is bad. Scene before music I'm afraid these days

accidentally pressed the reply button

So to like his music I think is crucial to your open-minded, music-loving part of your personality. And everyone I've met who loves Luke's music has that open mind.

Basically, you know you have a healthy, open-minded music taste which ignores peer pressure and superficiality if you can love his music. Go to one of his gigs and you will get that look of agreement from people in the room.

It's a challenge, but the results are well worth it

i've got a music degree.

that was petty of me, i know. but i do, so i know how to write music. unlike the general populus, i recognise the fact that i have nothing original or worthwhile to contribute musically, so i spend time trying in print to get closer to the definition of what one should or shouldn't compose to meet those goals. Luke leighfield, in my opinion, doesn't come very close to embodying them.

how is

christian piano pop a challenge?

this is an astonishingly pretentious post

you sound like a nob.

I think

Luke Leighfield's music is amazing, it's so light-hearted and easy-listening. I pretty much got into his work straight away - itunes was playing his songs at random - and the more I listened, the more I liked. Even if the lyrics don't have much meaning, it's still great stuff.

Nika

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon