Sign In:

Move: Not really a festival

When is a festival not a festival? When it’s sponsored by a train company and has all the atmosphere of a carpet warehouse. Yes, welcome to the second ‘Urban’ Move Festival.

The ‘move’ bit obviously relates to the stage which has been moved considerably further forward than last year to hide the fact that instead of Bowie, Green Day and Weller we’ve got a second rate Glasto checklist of the Manics, Feeder, and Inspiral Carpets and the accompanying poor ticket sales. Still, REM on Sunday, more of which later.

Even though it’s Manchester we’re in (Lancashire County Cricket Ground in Old Trafford to be precise), God’s got Blazin’ Squad on and it’s sunnier than an Iraqi POW camp. (Still, the other northern stereotype lives up to its name, as one of our expensive digital cameras is readily nicked from our hotel room halfway through Saturday.) Our friends Kinesis kick off Friday to precisely no one and with the press passes not here yet, sadly we can’t go and cheer them on either. The Mars Volta too, are a wasted proposition and though they valiantly bash out the finer bits of Deloused In Delirium, it’s not until Super Furry Animals roll up that anything starts to shine. Full marks to them though, for releasing a single about Ulrika Johnsson: ‘Golden Retriever’.

The Flaming Lips go one better and fill the stage with a bunch of super furry animals, including, we are told, the marketing director of ‘The Train Company’ (!) and repeat their glorious Glasto set for all those who don’t like proper festivals. The sad thing about the all new Top Of The Pops-mark Lips is that their music now plays a far second to the extravagant balloon shows and super-sized toy parade. It’s great fun all the shame, and Wayne Coyne and co certainly seem to be enjoying it a lot more than the Manics.

For the old Welsh guard this is clearly an unwanted bullet point on another promo schedule for yet another compilation album (their second inside a year). This time it’s b-sides, and save for ‘Take The Skinheads Bowling’ and ‘Prologue To History’ the b-sides they choose to play are complete arse. Whilst hits like ‘Little Baby Nothing’ and ‘Motorcycle Emptiness’ are sublime, they’re played with all the heart of a vegetarian’s fridge. When the concert finishes after an hour with no encore, the four thousand or so people that did turn up are left more than just dissatisfied. But hey, maybe that’s what an ‘urban’ festival is about.

Saturday’s attendance is much healthier even if the line-up isn’t. The Bees open up, with Puressence (no, us neither) making way for an incredibly well-received Inspiral Carpets set. Home soil does a lot, but fair’s fair - Clint Boon is a living legend. Dave Gahan is taking time off from Depeche Mode to practise magic. He manages to make almost the entire crowd disappear within two songs of his shirtless drone, proving that vocalists should just know their place and sing the songs they're given.

Look at Feeder for example. They know their limits as an insipid yet strangely popular indie-rock lemming; harmless and with the charisma of a two week stay in B&Q, and vehemently stick by them. Even the most callous hearted can’t deny the stupid-perfection of ‘Buck Rogers’, but with ‘Yesterday Went Too Soon’ sounding like Noel Gallagher on a drip, is it any wonder the drummer killed himself?

The Charlatans then, are still with us, god bless em, and deservedly so. ‘Just Lookin’’, ‘One To Another’ and ‘Impossible get thrown into the melting pot with new songs like the blinding ‘Today’ as well as the ill-remembered ‘Can't Even Be Bothered’, back from the dark ages of 1992.. ‘North Country Boy’ is glorious; every great nineties memory screwed together in one tune, but sadly the funky ‘You’re So Pretty…’ falls on its arse courtesy of the demi-shambolic performance. Typically, Tim Burgess is totally fucked and when John Collins’ pedals cut out halfway through; the inevitable live-breast-show keeps the crowd suitably amused. ‘You can bet REM won’t have this trouble tomorrow’ Tim quips. And with the crowd cheering the flesh, Burgess evidently thinks they're applauding him! But anyway, if REM have one tenth of The Charlatans' soul, all will be fine.

Sunday finally rears its sunburnt scalp and comparatively speaking, presents a good line up. By this time we’re done complaining about not going to T In The Park and instead revel in the dumb acceptance of Athlete’s South London charm and soak up the third continual day of blissful weather. It’s gone to Joel’s head though, the Athlete singer applauds, ‘Thanks for coming to see us, and [under his breath] REM.’ In your dreams.

John Squire unintentionally ends up as the day’s comedy act, and though he’s not helped by the sound man (drowning his guitar out in bass), his spirit killing renditions of ‘Made Of Stone’ and ‘Driving South’ don’t help. When Ian Brown played just a few bars of the opening to ‘Fools Gold’ last year, the Glasto crowd went ape. Sadly, when Johnny does it, he only succeeds in monkey-shitting on the myth for many a young Manc.

Idlewild thankfully, are still riding the surf of their critical and commercial tidalwave, easily playing to twice as many people the Manics two days before. Big, bold, brassy and, at times beautiful, the normally nonchalant Roddy Womble and co are visibly enjoying themselves. Despite seeing Idlewild at pretty much every festival for the last two years, it’s still rather a novelty to see them command huge stages so convincingly.

Without the inconvenience of anything more than his guitar and piano, Badly Drawn Boy’s hour warm-up for Da Athens Massive could easily have gone the same way as Squire’s. With the sound man intent on ruining it (how much low end do you need for one man and a guitar?), Badly’s constantly heard shouting for more guitar and vocals, telling the audience that ‘the monitors are fooked!’ Regardless, his performance is as heartrending as it is faultless.

A clutch of b-sides and new songs highlight his wonderful grasp of melody and wit combined with ‘Silent Sigh’, ‘Have You Fed The Fish’ and many of his other hits. His finger plucking guitar style is quite exquisite but what carries the show is his inimitable northern humour and magnetic charisma. ‘This is the biggest gig I’ve done and the closest one I’ve done to my house.’ There is indeed, no place like home.

Where the Manics and Charlatans have both attempted to regain early found form and fame (failing and partially succeeding, respectively), Planet REM has grown rings and gone supernova. They only play two post-millennium album tracks, but when one of them is ‘Imitation Of Life’, that doesn’t matter.

What gets the party moving though, is ‘Orange Crush’, ‘Drive’ and an incredible ‘Find The River’. ‘Fall On Me’ is still the most wonderfully unappreciated eighties gem, but it’s ‘At My Most Beautiful’ that brings jaws to the floor and hearts to the throats of some twelve thousand Stipe disciples. Even ‘Everybody Hurts’ shakes off the spell of overplay to reveal its truly fascinating depth. New songs: ‘Bad Day’, ‘Final Straw’ and ‘Animal’ range from being great, to mediocre to good; and are all very much of the ‘Automatic…’ and ‘Reveal’ mould.

The self-declared weather king (‘Thank me for the blissful weather’), Stipe and his five-piece band are spot on tonight. Wiping out a weekend of inadequacies in one 90 minute swoop, to say it pisses all over their Glasto performance would be to sell it criminally short. REM may not have any boundaries left to conquer but as a band they know no bounds.

‘Can you believe they put a man on the moon?’ Maybe if it was Michael Stipe.

DiScuss: How good were REM when you saw them at Glasto/Move/T?

Move: Not really a festival

I know this sounds wierd, but Idlewild bombed on the Sunday, they were avoided, but watched by the thousands who were obviously only there for REM. And yourt point about the Manics is shite and I've heard all that before. But the fest itself, yeah it was a corporated whore.

Move: Not really a festival

how can you say the manics are dull when they play die in the summertime and this is yesterday? your cheap remarks about feeder are just plain wrong (that's right, YOUR OPINION IS WRONG), and let's be honest, REM should have stopped about 20 years ago.

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Hahaha - so Feeder are great and REM are shit? OKay then.

The Manics are now slaves to the wage. They play stuff stuff just to promote records. Would the original manics with all their staunch political bollocks really be doing in store performances and releasing wank like Let Robson Sing or Ocean Spray?

Why don't you just...

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Utter crap. If you knew anything about the Manics, you would realise that mass appeal and playing the game promotion-wise have always been integral to their agenda.

Move along now

Move: Not really a festival

When is a festival not a festival? When it’s sponsored by a train company and has all the atmosphere of a carpet warehouse. Yes, welcome to the second ‘Urban’ Move Festival.

oh, FUCK OFF. Music festivals are about music and bands, not the ATMOSPHERE. I suppose you buy a Glastonbury ticket before the line up is announced cos you don't care who plays, you just dig that Glasto vibe. Seriously. Wanker.

Re: Move: Not really a festival

And then reviews the bands without having actually seen him if what the other thread says about Junior Senior is true ;)

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Running a festival site means going to pretty much every festival. Which I do.

When you see the same bands at several events it's totally about the athmosphere.

Only someone's who's never been to Glasto would make such a comment.

And I did watch Junior Senior, be it from outside the tent. If I didn't watch tbe bands, how do you think I would be able to photograph them, twat? See: virtualfestivals.com, i write and shoot. It's pretty difficult to do photos without being there.

A

Move: Not really a journalist

If you have issues with the 'corporate' and 'urban' side of things, then it obviously wouldn't be the festival for you, would it?

In fact, you'd then have a problem with all publications which could be deemed 'corporate' - for instance the NME, owned by IPC Media, which is an AOL Time Warner Company. I'm sure this very site is funded (is it by Simply Red's Management Company?) So how ridiculous to pick up on such things.

Also, all bands on Majors or bands on their Imprints, playing at festivals in the lovely countryside would be best avoided for one with such views.

'Even though it’s Manchester we’re in (Lancashire County Cricket Ground in Old Trafford to be precise)'
... yes it's Manchester 16 - do you want it to be held in Piccadilly Gardens? Funnily enough Manchester Airport is like Manchester 22. Fancy that.

'it’s sunnier than an Iraqi POW camp.' Wow, you do 'topical' too?

'the other northern stereotype lives up to its name, as one of our expensive digital cameras is readily nicked from our hotel room' Oh, how the pen would have been more rewarding.

Re: Athlete's singer saying ‘Thanks for coming to see us, and [under his breath] REM.’ You say, 'In your dreams'??? Hello, did you not hear people laugh? - it was a joke.

Thank goodness you liked BDB and REM, or what a waste of a press pass that would have been.

Lawrence.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

Oooh look, disgruntled festival organiser slags reviewer. For a change.

If you have issues with the 'corporate' and 'urban' side of things, then it obviously wouldn't be the festival for you, would it?

- I don’t have issues with those things as much as the shit line up. It was good last year; see VirtualFestivals.com for that. I personally gave the event more press than anyone last year, and with VirtualFestivals, have been a major supporter of it; so your whole argument kinda falls apart. The urban and corporate nature of the event are fine; most fests nowadays are that way. Thing is, Move wasn’t really like a festival this year. There was no community going on. It was all so soulless. What other festival have you been to this year?

In fact, you'd then have a problem with all publications which could be deemed 'corporate' - for instance the NME, owned by IPC Media, which is an AOL Time Warner Company. I'm sure this very site is funded (is it by Simply Red's Management Company?) So how ridiculous to pick up on such things.

- Not really. The whole point of a festival is a gathering of people away from the confines of society, the ‘rules, the laws that say you can only drink til 11 and can’t take drugs. It’s not where you go to be herded around being forced to queue for ages for everything.

Also, all bands on Majors or bands on their Imprints, playing at festivals in the lovely countryside would be best avoided for one with such views.

- This isn’t about ‘major label’ anything. Solely that the Manics, rather than play their great back catalogue chose to play shit songs solely for promotional purposes. I love the Manics but like many fans who I spoke to at the event, I was unimpressed by a set full of shite and the fact that it finished after just an hour.

'Even though it’s Manchester we’re in (Lancashire County Cricket Ground in Old Trafford to be precise)' .. yes it's Manchester 16 - do you want it to be held in Piccadilly Gardens? Funnily enough Manchester Airport is like Manchester 22. Fancy that.

- Eh? That’s a reference to the Manc stereotype of it raining, as made reference to by Michael Stipe when he said ‘thank me for the weather’ which was always sunny. Open your ears.

'it’s sunnier than an Iraqi POW camp.' Wow, you do 'topical' too?

- That’s right.

'the other northern stereotype lives up to its name, as one of our expensive digital cameras is readily nicked from our hotel room' Oh, how the pen would have been more rewarding.

- Naturally.

Re: Athlete's singer saying ‘Thanks for coming to see us, and [under his breath] REM.’ You say, 'In your dreams'??? Hello, did you not hear people laugh? - it was a joke.

- Yeah it was a joke but no one laughed. I know Athlete, they are top lads, but I think they’d agree they’ve got a few more albums in them before they reach REM heights.

Thank goodness you liked BDB and REM, or what a waste of a press pass that would have been.

– So who do you work for? Virgin Trains or Exposure or the PR firm? If you are from either of these places you’d do well to remember that even negative press is better than no press and as I detailed in an email to the event, there are many positive aspects of Move which were sadly out-weighed by a poor line-up this year.

Who’s next?

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

In fairness to Andy, he does go to a fair few festivals during the year and though he's put a few things under the knife the review is pretty spot on and quite well put.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

If there's no problem with it being sponsored by Virgin, then why begin by making out that there is?

Whether you thought it was good last year or not becomes irrelevant when you begin your review suggesting it would obviously not be a 'real' festival because of this.

Later, after the Manics review, you say people left dissatisfied ... 'maybe that’s what an ‘urban’ festival is about.' Erm, no ... it's probably that the Manics are a poor band, ten years past their relevance. Again, it seems the very nature of the event, this time in terms of location, annoys you which doesn't make sense considering Manchester is urban, the event is billed as being urban ... and so on. Can you only leave satisfied if you are at a festival in a farmer's field?

In terms of the Manics only playing promotionally, well let's be honest all bands do that, some more than others admittedly but that's the nature of music. No band would play it if they didn't have a greatest hits, latest album, single ... whatever to promote. And you play it in the hope you make new fans who will buy your record, see you live etcetc. Obviously every performance is promotional.

I personally thought that some of the line-ups were poor. I don't disagree with you there. Performances by people like John Squire for instance were absolute drivel. When you buy your ticket to an event (or get your free pass) you do know the general line-up, so it seems a waste of time complaining about that side of things.

The sponsors, the location, the line-up ... these are things which were in place before you saw any performances, and so it seems hard to see how you could view the event for what it was when you portray yourself as having such a negative view of these types of things in the first place. The fact a camera was stolen could only make your professional judgment worse or more cynical presumably. For instance, why make out that the Athlete singer thought people were really there to see them, when he was joking? Of course they are no REM, and that's what he was saying. You make him out to be arrogant with your comments. Whether or not you know him and the band doesn't matter when we read the review, does it?

The Manchester Move festival will not put on an event like Glastonbury, with all the different tents etc. It can obviously put on some of the bands which play all the fests and it does do that ... is that bad? Yes it is, if you go to all the festivals (for free?) and get bored with seeing the same acts do the same things over and over again. How many of the Manchester locals attending the Move event can afford to go to every festival? Not many, and so the organisers will put on acts they believe people will turn out to see. In this case, ticket sales were poor on day one and two, I believe, and so they got it wrong. By its very nature Move is more limited than other events - what was it ... 18 bands in all?

And no, I don't work for Virgin or Move festival or anyone at all involved with that event. I paid for my ticket and went ... and I enjoyed it because I hadn't seen all the bands ten times before, just like most of the people there hadn't either. And when you say it's about atmosphere (simply because you've been to so many festivals) you forget that many people aren't able to go here, there and everywhere - thus it's about the bands on the day performing good songs well, not about the surroundings, or the sponsors, or anything else for that matter. Anyway, your definition of festival would never fit in with the essence of Move, what with it having a curfew.

To me, a festival is about being exposed to bands you may not have heard or seen live before, regardless of who sponsors it, whether it is indoor or outdoor, in the sun or in the rain, drugs or no drugs, grass or mud ... it's about the music. The fact that REM shone so much more in the 'carpet warehouse' atmosphere of Manchester than they did in the festive atmosphere of Glastonbury, surely proves this.

Lawrence.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

It wasn’t a real festival because there was nothing to distinguish it from anything else. It could have been three gigs.

The very nature of the event does not annoy me. If it did why would I have enjoyed it last year? Obviously bands play to promote stuff but there’s a line between soullessly doing the rounds of ‘look at what we’re releasing next week’ and a mix of old and new. If John Squire can play Fools Gold why can’t the Manics play Australia for example?

It’s a waste of time complaining about the line up if you’ve bought a ticket knowing what you’re getting, but the point of a review is to look at the event in retrospect. Knowing that there’s a bill of shite bands is no excuse for a bill of shite bands. That’s a really weak argument.

Your whole rant is made up of inaccurate interpretations of things I’ve said. I couldn’t give a fuck about who sponsored it, but the fact is the music was crap.

I have no problem with the location and make no reference to having one, or the sponsors. This isn’t about that, they are incidental. Read the review and you will see that my criticisms lie with:

- shit line up
- no atmosphere due to bad billing and poor attendance
-
Don’t try and leaf over my criticisms by attributing them to my supposed dislike of corporate events. Homelands is corporate, as is Download. They still had a great vibe.

Mentioning the camera theft was to magnifiy the bad time we were having. I didn’t make Joel (the Athlete singer) out to be anything, I merely quoted what he said and said, ‘You wish’.

I appreciate that many Move attendees would not have gone to Glasto et al, and in that respect having bands that had already played Glasto isn’t in itself a travesty. But when they offer absolutely nothing new whatsoever then it becomes a fair thing to criticise. Bands like Idlewild, Manics, Kinesis are always touring. Festival should be special occasions to see a collection of bands you’d rarely catch. Like Bowie or New Order last year, or the Chilis at V Festival or Metallica at Reading/Leeds. I don’t think Oranger and The Bees arrant that.

For example, if you’re paying £75 odd for a weekend ticket and not more than half of the bands appeal, then it’s a waste of money.

You’re right, atmosphere isn’t about sponsors but it is about the feeling from the crowd. And when the crowd present is less than you’d get at a fair sized London gig then it’s marred considerably. Move may be different from the general consensus of what a festival is, or mine, or whatever, but the simple fact comes down to the music.

Soulless Manics performance, ropey Charlatans, too many small unheard of bands (Oranger, Puressence), too many old people making pointless comebacks (Gahan, Squire) and huge queues for beer.

In conclusion then, if you’d pay £25 a day to see them, then you’re welcome to.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

Minor point:

Puressence are a Manchester band and have released 3 albums on Island Records.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

Indeed Puressence do have a little history to them, as well as some tunes ... but are probably most appreciated by a local audience. Gahan and Squire are dreadful and goodness knows why they were on the bill.

As for putting on bands you'd rarely catch live ... well Bowie maybe, but New Order toured 'Get Ready' and that Move gig was their third Manc gig for that album.

'if you’re paying £75 odd for a weekend ticket and not more than half of the bands appeal, then it’s a waste of money.' - goes without saying, you'd be pretty stupid, wouldn't you? However, if you like REM, BDB, Idlewild, Athlete, then £30 is fine I feel.

As part of a band's promotional activities, they may well tour and play festivals, obviously. How would a band playing ten festivals (to many people who don't know their stuff) offer 'something new' to people who don't even know what they're like? Should 5% of an audience be thinking 'ah this is an acid jazz version of SONG X' whilst the majority think 'ah right, they're an acid jazz band'? In other words, at what point should bands play sets aimed at a minority of hardcore fans at festivals, when so many more people have never seen them before?

In a busy touring schedule, how can a band even attempt to make their song set sound so different that the people at every gig go home with something new each time?

Soulless Manics - yes but for how many years have they been soulless? It surprises me that anyone thinks they became soulless overnight. Try 1996.

From reading your messages here, it does become apparent that the sponsor doesn't matter and the location doesn't etc. But I read your review without knowing all this. So when you say ...

'When is a festival not a festival? When it’s sponsored by a train company and has all the atmosphere of a carpet warehouse.' - without trying to misconstrue your opening comment, it really cannot be a festival because it has a train company sponsoring it?! I mean, that's what it says, I'm not changing your words about. Fine, if it doesn't have your average festival feel because the crowd is dull or whatever, that's another thing ... but what does that have to do with a sponsor?

And about leaving dissatisfied ... 'maybe that’s what an ‘urban’ festival is about.' Huh? I'm merely saying those type of comments appear to show the concept, sponsor, location is flawed! I'm not reading anything other than the words printed.

Lawrence.

Re: Move: Not really a festival

"Only someone's who's never been to Glasto would make such a comment."

sorry, mate, but that is such a cop out ...

Re: Move: Not really a festival

but Mr Future was absolutely spot on.

Re: Move: Not really a festival

oh, grow up.
no amount of "atmosphere" can make up for a shit lineup. aren't you a music fan?

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Which is what I said.

You people don't even know what you're arguing about, do you?

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Atmosphere makes all the difference whether you have a good time or bad. Agreed, no amount of atmosphere can make up for a shit lineup, but a good (or middling, or bad) lineup can definately be spoiled by shit atmosphere. Reading seems to be heading that way - filled with lager louts who burn toilets and don't give a shit about the music. That and ugly sunburnt nu-metallers

Re: Move: Not really a festival

where's the logic in that?
music fans listen to music.
live shows are about a whole show, the context, the atmosphere, the scene, the people, the spectacle. it's about your whole day revolving around bands. it's about the weeks that lead up, waiting, anticipating. it's about being taken somewhere else for an hour a year by your favourite band. it's about letting go.
then again, for a lot of people it's about consumption, pretending you're taking part in history and making much a do about nothing.
then again, it's about corporations creating/hi-jacking a cultural event, to generate brand awareness and connotations with their product. admittedly in this case Branson was responsible for Tubular Bells, Rolling Stones and in some shape or for the Sex Pistols, amongst others.
then again, i could tell you all about the festival but i couldn't get a train home on sunday night, couldn't afford a hotel, so didn't go.

Re: Move: Not really a festival

yeah, i know .... but i just get annoyed by people who say that it doesn't matter who plays at Glastonbury because Glastonbury has a unique atmosphere.

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Next summer. Next summer.
How about headliners of Pj Harvey, (the reformed) Mc5, Dandy Warhols (playing a proper set), Bright Eyes and Sigur Rós on the the mainstage? Arab Strap opening the fest in blazing sunshine. Elliot Smith, Cat Power, dEUS, Spiritualized.. and then a decent rock tent, an electronica chillout tent, a straight no chaser arranged hip-hop tent, a really insane tent with Josh Homme's desert sessions headlining and alsorts of smaller intimate things.
I really could go on and on...
None of the good bands clash.
People are encouraged to check out the new acts by announcements and big gaps on the mainstage.
A wind room that dries wet people and cools hot people. Loads of stones and hay on the mud. Proper walkways on flatted surfaces. Tents arranged so people are forced to meet other people.
Random performers amongst gear change overs.
Free water.
Hose downs and towels for £2.
Health and Safety checks on the food stalls, who sell affordable food.

I can dream...

Re: Move: Not really a festival

Benicassim has all that, save the rock bands.

The big bands are all on after 9.30, the medium bands start at 4.30. There's a dance and chillout tent. The thing goes on til 6am.

The beer is free. The sunshine lasts all bight.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

hehehe ur called lawrence
wat kind of a name is that

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

What's more funny : being called Lawrence, or someone laughing at you being called Lawrence when you're not actually called Lawrence?

Lawrence.

Move: Grimace of A Sour Mouth

Interesting to read Andrew Future's review on the Move. I think it's fair to say that there are some valid points to be made. Is It A festival ? - well you can't camp, but for one, at least an effort is made to get a big outdoor event going in the City.

OK so the bands may not have been as stellar as the more established festivals - MOVE is surely way down the pecking order of events that are 5-10 years plus old. U2 or Radiohead aren't going to play overnight (although they always include Manchester in their tour schedules).

But back to the review - its fair enough not to like the bands in question, but I wonder how much of an exercise this is in reporting as opposed to self congratulating ego boosting ? OK so you can write, but the really stupid thing to scribe is that "its no wonder the feeder drummer topped himself"....(?) very ironic and clever I'm sure. It's probably the worst single example of writing I've seen on DiS and a shame that they're happy to publish this. I'd like to think that most people are willing to express an opinion rather than present themselves as alternative comedians. Mr Futures comments about "Northern Folk" are accepted in the spirit in which they have been presented and we'd be more than happy to prove him wrong next time he's in Mcr - all he has to do is get in touch.

Re: Move: Grimace of A Sour Mouth

There's a similarly flippant remark about the Feeder drummer in last week's NME single review of The Koreans single. How comes no one's drawn attention to that?

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

Ha ha to you all.
You all choose to be in Manchester.
At a mediocre at best 'festival'.
Ha ha.
I'd rather dust my nuts with icing sugar and stick them in an anthill than EVER step foot in Manchester again. For anything.
Maybe...

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

Pretnding to be called Lawrence when you're not actally called Lawrence is pretty funny too.

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

I'm confused, was the Move festival organised by Lawrence Llewelyn-Bowen?

Re: Move: Grimace of A Sour Mouth

I didn't see that either - they're twats as well - I don't even like Feeder - I think they're crap, but it's not in very good taste to be syaing he topped himself because the music is shit. Surely someone purporting to be a journo should have taste as opposed to immature sarcastic sub-wit. There are surely more inventive and intelligent ways to to prove your claim.

stinks

Re: Move: Not really a journalist

I can confirm I did not organise anything other than my beautiful mauve surroundings.

Lawrence.

Move: Charlatans

You could at least get the song titles correct, and one which you state as a new song is in fact an old track from 1992!!

Re: Move: Charlatans

Yeah sorry, called 'Can't Even Be Bothered' isn't it, though that wasn't what he annoucned it as. Never said it was a new song tho. Wrong names are what happens when you write a review whilst the gigs going on a laptop.

Is a truly awful song tho; weakest Charlies LP by a mile.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon