Sign In:
Login with Facebook
57947

The Insider: Dear Paul Morley, IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT, F^CK OFF!



When two things collide sometimes it just really gets to you. For me, those two things this week were the Mercury Music Prize and the Review Show / Newsnight Review / whatever they’ve rebranded it to with a panel of ‘experts’ discussing whether the music industry was up the shitter on Friday night.

Paul Morley, Krissi Murison (NME Editor), Tom Service (Guardian classical music editor) and Miranda Sawyer shouted over each other, deferred to Paul Morley’s endless endless banging on about Marx / Philip Glass / anything else that makes him sound like the preening egotist he truly is for 45 minutes interspersed with the thoughts of Chairman Mills (Beggars Group) and some other industry types on the Mercury red carpet who, surprisingly, decided that the music industry isn’t dead. Oh, and Dave Ellis got some face time to claim T In The Park (founded 1994) as one of the ‘original’ festivals. Jesus. This followed reams of tedious opinions about how The XX (sorry, theallinlowercasexx) were the ‘dull but right’ choice for the Mercury. Yawn.

Meanwhile, across the world, bands and artists were just getting on with it untroubled by Paul Morley’s grumpy old man assertion that bands were better when he were a lad (think back Paul, weren’t the same people that you now are, those who grew up idolising Zeppelin etc telling you that all punk was just Fifties retreads...see a connection there?), Krissi Murison’s inability to push any kind of youthful agenda into the discussion and Miranda Sawyer’s impression of a woman waiting for a bus and talking to those around her about nothing in particular to pass the time. The only member of the panel who seemed in any way to give a shit about MUSIC, not his public image or the record companies or any of that sideshow was Tom Service. He talked about the emotional connection that music gives you, the transportation from the day to day world to another place, the romanticism of engaging with music that makes you feel. Paul Morley meanwhile suggested festival goers are engaging in a passivism akin to Marx’s (again, yawn) comment on religion and masses. Having met Tom this comes as no great surprise as, unlike the vast majority of popular music media types, here is a person who actually thinks before he opens his mouth, opens his mind to other opinions and likes music more than his own media profile. A genuine music critic, with a knowledge beyond his specialisation and a humility to learn from others.

Days before I had sat open mouthed as the scant Mercury coverage (no complaint there, watching awards ceremonies does not equal music tv) as Miranda Sawyer (again), Lauren Laverne and Nihal filibustered 15 minutes of airtime waiting for Jools to announce the winner. Endless pointless surface analysis, the music critic equivalent of a NHS drop in centre diagnosis trundled by, Miranda liked this, Nihal played that in his car on a long drive, no one was rude about anything, no real point was made and then cut to the winner. Who, it has to be said, hardly enlivened proceedings.

The point of all this? That the very people who claim to be desperately concerned about music are, in fact, bored shitless by it, the people who like it and those who make it. The critics from '79/'80, the executives living off signing some band we dimly remember from a decade ago, the subscribers to this ‘music industry in crisis’ industry, squeezing yet more profile and more cash for themselves out of destroying the very thing they claim to care about. If Paul Morley really thinks that modern music is crap and thinks bands and artists have nothing to say, can’t he just fuck off my tv and stop moaning about it and go and do something else instead?

As part of the DiS ten year anniversary I am working on a piece that talks about developments over that decade, where the industry embraced a changing world, where it shied away, where the chances were and when they were embraced or rejected. So far my reading of things is less than cheery, a constant unwillingness to change, a combination of head in the sand approaches and throttling of new approaches at birth, the triumph of marketers and lawyers over creative people, the constant subjugation of dreams to concrete grey realities created by those who control the dream machines and have done so for far too long.

I am looking for real voices to add to this piece, the thoughts of the DiS messageboarders and those who have responded to my previous columns as to what you think the last ten years have meant both positively and negatively for MUSIC. Not music companies but bands, artists, fans, the people who actually make things happen and are at the heart of things. I look forward to the usual mix of intelligent comments and abuse.

The BBC Review show is available until Friday via the iPlayer

He.

i think you summed him up...

with 'egotist' & 'grumpy old man'. People like him should n't be allowed on the TV screens at things like this. He's your typical chin scratcher at gigs which he gets in for free.

Lets trade him in for someone who still has a heart for music

I'm not sure what I think of music development to be honest

I consume more music than ever now, but find I don't 'love' it like I used to. I wondered at first if this was due to my age, but don't think it is as I genuinely loathe most of the records I bought in the 90s and far prefer much of what I have bought in the last 5 years or so.

I do think a part of it comes down to listening to music beforehand on a record player or CD player with the booklet in hand; whereas now it's something I fit in around other stuff.

But I can honestly say that whilst I don't actively leap around at gigs anymore or get so obsessed with being at a record shop at 9am, I love music more than ever in the 2010s.

Music will find a way to stay relevant and profitable I'd hazard a guess at. But people who have no interest in it at the top or else music makers unwilling to do it all themselves to bring home the bacon might struggle I reckon.

big wigs at big record companies are just shitting themselves cause people are starting to realise that you don't actually need them to have a successful music career.

who is Paul Morley?

He's no Dom Gourlay anyway.

Only skim read that, but i like the name Tom Service

Has anyone read his book?

I think it's called "Words and Music" and it's incomparably awful.

Norley in his day was something of a genius

and a firebrand. But aye he did himself no favours on Friday. God damn it made me angry that discussion show.

Morley rather

Add to your list

anyone who starts a conversation about the music industry in 2010 by talking about how people "consume their music" now. If you see the word "consume" at any point, turn the radio or TV off before the person uttering the word can complete their sentence.

KiK, you've got it wrong

he wrote a biog for Patrick Wolf. And we ran the biog, as part of a week of running pieces artists had commissioned - including John 'Kill Your Friends' Niven's biog of the Manics, which was an incredible piece of writing.

The music industry is returning to equilibrium

should also remember that before 1900 there was no real recording industry. there were very few national stars and musicians played music for a living instead of miming at video shoots and doing daytime TV. and that's the model we're returning to. artists with smaller fanbases and fewer Bentleys. Yes, it makes it hard to make music, but it could also flatten the music industry and make it far far healthier in the long run. and that's without delving into the hideously complicated bit about the value of music as a commodity.

massive generalisation

there are tons of people in 'the industry' at the moment working very hard to promote/release bands who arent cynical or motivated by cash or subduing creativity. ironically the XX are a case in point - label mates with el guincho, glasser, holy fuck etc.

what you're railing against are just the kinds of critics and personalities promoted by the BBC and this award. they have been, and always will be mostly irrelevant in any field - not just music. those are jobs that the truly passionately motivated very very rarely break into, probably for good reason.

I think it's a struggle to separate the music from the industry really.

Since the industries profits have tanked guitar music has become more and more the exclusive preserve of trust fund kids with nothing to say.

I think the last couple of posters here

have maybe taken the decline of guitar based indie to somehow be synonymous with music as a whole... I think stulambert is right that pluralisation may be to blame, but it's daft to say that music as a whole stagnated in 1997 (though the late 90s weren't a GREAT time for it), that's no more accurate than saying it all peaked in the 60s (I mean, what are you even really doing on a new music website founded in three years after music ended..?).

But I think the main thing is that the big money's dropped out of forming a retro guitar combo, hence there are fewer guitar bands, simple as that. I mean, in many ways it's baffling that it persisted as the dominant form for so long - I mean, why WOULD a bunch of lads want to be in The View, other than presumably expecting they could make some money out of it..?

And awaythecrowroad... I am quite middle class, and I have never, ever met a single person with a trust fund. I doubt they've that they're rife in the modern music scene, and I imagine what actually happens is that most people in bands just have 'jobs' to keep them going. Like I said above, I think one of the big changes in indie over the last few years is that there's less money to be made in bashing out retro guitar anthems, which is No Bad Thing.

possibly

stupid Dis..

Want to buy a delete button please...

What I was trying to say with a bit of hyperbole is that it's really not a type of music for the poor anymore and for better or worse most of the best music we as a country have produced has come from the working classes. Take them out of the mix through economics and it's no great surprise that most of our guitar music lacks fire or something to say.

I'm not that bothered by it though. While guitar music has died a death artistically and financially stuff like dubstep has replaced it and bettered it in many ways. Something like CCTV by LV is a fine spiritual successor to Ghost Town as an example. It's just a bit rubbish for someone who exclusively listens to guitar music that they have such a listless collection of student tossers as their gateways into music...

though...

the Brooklyn scene is basically trust fund central. Even the better stuff like Animal Collective is clearly from excessively wealthy backgrounds and it shows in the complete lack of anything worth saying lyrically...

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon