Live 8? Not so great
It has been but five weeks since Live 8. I thought this a reasonable time period to wait before reminding people about Africa.
I was horrified at how much the media bought into the concept, especially the broadsheets, who can usually be depended upon to speak up with a level of baulk or at least have an opinion beyond the press release. Alas, the line was duly toed by all and sundry. Something was amiss.
Few of my generation will remember anything of the original Live Aid and as such can not really compare it to its recent successor but what is known is that twenty years ago the event saved thousands and thousands of lives through direct aid.
The money raised was spent on emergency supplies to slow the famines of the time and then more long-term plans were implemented, involving water programmes and other amenities such as the implementation of school and hospital systems.
There are many that are opposed to concept of ‘aid’, claiming that it is ultimately disruptive and causes further dependency in the future but, in the case of Live Aid, that means bugger all because lives were saved. Surely that matters?
Live 8, on the other hand, held a more major, more contemporary weapon against famine in The Petition. Eh? EH? How many lives are a few thousand signatures going to save? Oh no. These aren’t actually going to save lives, but they will “raise awareness” to the problems that Africa is facing right now. Right?
This obviously means that everyone now knows the names of the countries that are in trouble? Any sort of trouble: famine; war; drought; poverty, debt. Name me five. Name me one.
Don’t forget that the main target of this War On Ignorance was the G8 summit. Did the world leaders have revelations of magnanimous proportions? Is everything out in the open? Did anything happen? Was there even any backlash from the media against these reckless political martyrs? Do you remember any?
The levels of sycophancy and self-gain attitudes surrounding this debacle were simply astounding. In the wake of the news that Bob Geldof is now receiving up to £50,000 to go give talks wherever he is hired it is not difficult to see who was in it for what purpose.
Sure, Geldof does plenty more charity work and apparently ‘raises awareness’ over a number of topics but nothing comes for free. The rather dishevelled face of Live 8 is testament to that.
And what of those who performed at the event? Why were they there? What did they really believe in? Was it merely shameless self-promotion with the amiable aside of helping the poor Africans. Did they really believe that singing a couple of golden hits from their heyday would help?
This was all merely a façade for the furthering and prolonging of this current level of capitalism. The strong lefties have long campaigned against aid for poverty because they know that the only way for capitalism to survive is in the presence of poverty elsewhere.
Live 8 managed to allow The People to believe that they’ve really done something about ridding the world of horrible poverty by watching their favourite band play a couple of numbers and buying a white wristband. Now they’ve done their bit, they can forget about Africa.
Just as you had done before you started reading this article. Live 8 will have been heralded a resounding success, whereas all it has actually achieved is allowing Africa to continue in the same poverty as before, just with fewer people talking about it.
Perfect.
- Watch: Imaginary Landscapes a documentary about Brian Eno and ambient music
- U2 - Achtung Baby (20th Anniversary Deluxe Edition)
- Glastonbury 2011: The DiS Highlights
- In Photos: U2 @ Glastonbury Festival 2011
- In Photos: Glastonbury Festival 2011 - Day 2 @ Worthy Farm, Pilton
- DiSsers Recommend... Who to see at Glastonbury 2011
- Glastonbury 2011: DiS' 65-Songs to Get You In The Mood (Spotify)
- Death Cab for Bass: Mixtape of Songs That Inspired Nick to Play Bass
Live 8? Not so great
Live 8? Not so great
There's been no news of what, if anything, has happened because of Live8, other than record sales. There seemed to be more news of Pink Floyd's 1300% sales rise than what the decisions made by the G8 will actually do to help Africa, if anything.
i know little of the problems in Africa, i admit, but i do know that you'd need to sort out their government before they can even use aid properly to help those who desperately need it, let alone utilise the 'awareness' that was raised.
i also know that hundreds of thousands of people are going to die tomorrow from hunger and it feels like all we can do is sit here and argue about what's not being done. It's heartbreaking and desperately unfair.
Re: Live 8? Not so great
Granted, the bombs did take attention away almost immediately but stories were still written in the aftermath of Live 8 and they were few, far between and rather pointless. Will they go back to the topic of Africa after the bomb shit has died down? I doubt it.
Live 8? Not so great
Re: Live 8? Not so great
I don't care if I share this view with the daily mail. EVEN THE MAIL must be right sometimes!
Re: Live 8? Not so great
usually 'people' say things without knowing what is what is all.
Live 8? Not so great
Not least AOL/Time Warner, Universal and SonyBMG
call me a cynic but the oligopoly of majors treated this 'charity' event as an all day TV ad and a very profitable one at that
but more than that it was research and developement for the global media groups as they got to find out just how direct the internet can be as a sales aid (U2 and macca's version of Sgt Pepper topping the download charts in 17 countries less than an hour after broadcast for example)
As for the G8 summit, obviously the bombs in London caused a major distraction but I don't think they affected the outcome of the summit in real terms - it was pretty much decided by civil servants in the months up to the summit what exactly the leaders would be signing up to.
Obviously the bombs in London were a terrible atrocity but hadn't we had Bono, Chris Martin, Brad Pitt et al telling us only 3 days before that in Africa a child dies from poverty every 3 seconds? 30,000 people a day dying from lack of food, medicines, resources etc.?
Two weeks after live8 we see news reports of biblical scale famine in Niger and now Mali - both a combination of borderline nutritional/economic existence and climate change.
Truth is the US administration and others see a profit opportunity when it comes to climate change - they are actively seeking to create an entire industry of high tech environmental 'solutions' whilst at the same time burying their heads in the sand over Kyoto and even the existence of global warming
Personally I feel that climate change is THE most critical threat to human life on a global scale - no one nation can ever be immune to it and to think the way certain officials do that technology is a weapon that can overcome any foe is quite simply wrong. Since the conquistadors colonised south and central america up to the present day the west has been touting the notion that technical/technological superiority equals moral superiority. This is the falsehood that modern life is built on and it is responsible for so so many evils that it is chilling to contemplate.
G8 and Live8 did NOTHING for Africa - NOTHING AT ALL - despite the best intentions of a vast number of people.
I wish I could add something positive to this but unfortunately nothing springs to mind...
Re: Live 8? Not so great
Re: Live 8? Not so great
in theory they were free ... in practice we always "suggested" they make a friendly donation to money box on the counter
Live 8? Not so great
PS. On a more opionated topic, the whole line up of Live 8 was shite.
Live 8? Not so great
Of course , it diluted the other efforts that really mean something.As Monbiot wrote recently - Geldof and Co. were actually giving their blessings to the goverments(ergo,the corporations) who are responsible for ...everything. Blair Bush etc. actually took part in this.i think thats self defeating.It gives the impression that the neocons and neolibs are working to 'make poverty history' ,and nothing could be farther from the truth
Live 8? Not so great
1) The Who were amazing! (No...I mean AMAZING. Floyd were vintage Floyd...as in piss boring and about as rock and roll as a pair of slippers)
2) I know numbers aren't particularly headline grabbing, but didn't they write off a f**kload of debt at that G8 summit. Would they have done so without the campaign???
3) Poverty will never be history. One mans poverty is another mans wealth, and there will always be someone richer than you. Make trade fair... absolutely, but Make Poverty History always seemed a silly campaign title to me.
Re: Live 8? Not so great
Re: Live 8? Not so great
Now really you should know that's not the kind of "poverty" that needs to be made history
Re: Live 8? Not so great
Live 8? Not so great
Despite what you may have heard, eloquence is important.
You seem to believe that raising aid money is more significant than changing the global political structures that damage Africa. This is deeply naive. Africa will suffer and starve every year if we continue to opress and exploit it. Giving aid in a big push every twenty years will leave Africa in the doldrums.
There are many areas of African political life (corruption, patronage, lack of infrastructure, aids etc.) that we can do little about but providing African governments with the opportunity to pour their revenue back into their country (Rather than western coffers) is surely a good idea.
Allowing fair access to our markets should surely help as well. With trade barriers and subsidies lowered or removed poor nations would no longer be dumping grounds for our cheap surplus, and thus there farmers would be able to make money feeding their own people - fancy that?! These are things that will help in the long-term; that will allow improvements in African nations to run deeper.
The G8 summit was not a resounding success. Bush and co. did take the opportunity presented by the London bombings to dodge some vital issues. Yes, Global Warming is *the* biggest problem we face.
Was the Make Poverty History camapign a resounding succes? No. Did it help force some changes? Yes. Has it helped make African poverty look more like the responsibility of politicians (wha can effect change) than aid agencies (who repair damage)? Yes.
So the world wasn't saved. But it did more good than bad, which is a rare enough treat for a major political event that i'm going to savour it.
Re: Live 8? Not so great
Re: Live 8? Not so great
I bought a new wrist band a couple of weeks ago becuase my original one was definitely not white anymore. I think I'm going to continue to wear one until something is done, and thats because I honestly beleive in the cause (my arm is not adorned with a hundred random wristbands purporting unity with a hundred different charities/dodgy corner shops). I know its not much, wearing a wristband isn't going to save the world and I'm fully aware of that, but at least it will show that I haven't forgotten about why I started wearing it in the first place.
I liked the article though :)
yes
god it was shit

Half-Year: DiS' Most Read Articles, Reviews and Threads of 2012 (so far!)
In Photos: V Festival 2011 @ Weston Park, Staffordshire
Next DiS Fandango takeover Tuesday 25/03/03
U2
Paul McCartney
Razorlight
Band Aid 20
Champion Sound #13: Part 1 – Ten Yeezus Pieces
Parklife Weekender 2013 – The Drowned in Sound Review
Drowned In Sheffield #14
DiS Does Singles 17.06.13: Dornik, Washed Out, AlunaGeorge
All Hail the Culturati... Fighting Over Radiohead's Hail to the Thief
Cutting Through the Noise: What it's really like representing new artists at events like The Great Escape
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article