Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
and their sister organisations the London banterati and the London shaberati
it doesn't make much sense (the church, the army and the royal family fostered our democracy?) but that's how he sees it.
We should be helping these kind of right-wing crybaby men. They seem unhappy.
It's true that I despise Mail readers for their dreams of a decent education though.
quite a lot of the article is also potentially libellous (repeating the content of the tweet about andy burnham, the thing about david kelly). the guardian will print anything.
my paper is the voice of Britain because I insist it is, and everyone was a Christian monarchist mega-patriot like 50 years ago or something so I don't see why that isn't actually the case now. You can waffle on about socialism and Marxism you mental lefties but what about the EVILS of those systems; unlike capitalism which is 100 percent good OBVIOUSLY
and a couple of semi-decent points that are made redundant by the general simplistic thinking, arrogance, and sheet-stirring throughout
the left are so bothered with the Daily Mail, because that's the whole point of the paper.
It's columnists pride themselves on being irritants more than the quality of their journalism (LITTLEJOHN); wilfully uses inflammatory headlines (something Dacre pathetically attempts to defend in his article).