Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
I'm going with "no".
it's basically the worst thing ever. I'm sure he's been mocked on here before, I just wanted to start another bout.
I just wondered if he was famous for being in some band or something but in fact he's just a shit journalist.
and googling just brings up a link to his columns. All of which are beyond awful.
Also: that picture? He looks about thirty, yet appears to be dressed as a member of a nu rave band circa 2007. What.
and then turns out to not be a spoof.
I didn't really understand the point of it. He wasn't talking about a particular subject or issue eg talking about clothes in the fashion pages. He just waffled on about his kerazy cousin.
Pretty much might as well be family, I guess.
His face says 48, but his cap says 16.
it's not funny or... anything really.
I had to rub my eyes cartoonishly and read it again.
that doesn't make him look like a 40 year old dressed as a Skins cast member.
Now he just looks really sweaty
to read a 14-line poem.
I expect it'll be in there. My friend was in it once. It was minorly exciting.
Wow, Waterloo," cackled Tony, "you must really like him.
And on Saturday night I went to a party in some Mexican dive bar in Waterloo - apart from the odd dash to the Tate, it was the first time I'd been south of the river since visiting my dying Nanny in the late Eighties - with loads of Arthur's art school friends.
then the bit above
i h8 DiS
Disappointing, he looks normal now.
Also disappointing is now that he's editor of Tatler it's looking less and less likely his column is a spoof.