Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
if they only took the animal in four years ago, and it was "near-feral" beforehand, how do they know how old it is?
"The researchers propose that the dinosaur's rump was 25% larger than had previously been thought. This probably meant more muscle mass and therefore greater acceleration, giving it a greater chance of evading meat-eating dinosaurs in hot pursuit. "
Do you think the same logic applies to Americans?
in the name of research. Apparently not a single American has been eaten by a meat-eating dinosaur. Thats evidence enough for me.
"Pussywillow was near-feral when she was first taken in by the family. When Willow came my son was four. He is now 30," Ms Brown said.
"The family only started feeding the elderly feline after she survived an attack by a fox four years ago."
suggests to me that the comment re: her son was a rubbish "comparative" thing.
Someone has screwed that up, it doesn't make much sense.
But again; DINOSAUR MUMMY!!!
that they took the cat in and lived with them since the son was four but then didn't feed it and it hunted for itself until the fox attack.
for the use of feral.
what i guess this comes down to is an old woman seeing a black cat in and around her garden for twenty years. SO IT MUST BE THE SAME ONE!!!!!
It's unclear whether prior to that they'd somehow taken it to the vets and that's what the claim's based on...
"The black cat, who now enjoys curling up by the stove,..."
CAT IN 'DOES FUCK ALL' SHOCK.
because cats are stupid
lying around all day doing fuck all. WELL STUPID