Oasis to be honoured at Brit Awards
- Artists:
- Oasis »
Manchester indie-rockers Oasis will scoop the award for Outstanding Contribution To Music at next year's Brit Awards.
The quintet - who release a 'best of', Stop The Clocks, on November 20 - will pick up the award at the Valentine's Day ceremony, to be held at Earls Court. It'll be broadcast live on television.
BPI Chairman Peter Jamieson said of the decision to honour Oasis: "Oasis set the standard for many of the young rock bands who are currently enjoying success in the UK charts. As the Brit Awards goes live for the first time in nearly two decades, it is appropriate that we should honour one of the most exciting live acts the UK has produced."
Oasis release an EP, also called Stop The Clocks, a week before their best-of collection.
- Andy Bell of Ride & Oasis: "It would be a shame if we never got to play those songs one more tim
- Oasis - Time Flies 1994-2009
- NME Awards 2010 shortlist announced
- Spotifriday #30: This Week on DiS as a Playlist
- Animal Collective, Bat For Lashes and Florence up for Brit Awards
- Friday Fun: Guess the song from The Music Painter
- The Insider: Class Wars
- In The City demo deadline fast approaching
"one of the most exciting and unpredictable live acts"
G.G. Allin would vomit in Liam's face for breakfast (if he wasn't really REALLY dead).
Outstanding contribution?
what outstanding contribution?
Outstanding contribution
to album releases in 1994.
Agree re gg allin
oasis - 4 bricklayers stood stock still playing their instruments like they were tools they hadn't yet mastered. Brilliant
Here we go...
outstanding contribution in that: they've made some amazing music; they've played some of the biggest gigs this country's ever seen; they've influenced more bands around today than anyone else (who's still around...).
I don't see how this is even open to debate!...even if you hate them it's not rocket science to see that they've had a massive impact on music over the last decade....whether yous like it or not.
I disagree
it's not about whether I like it or not - it's simply that I fail to see how they've made an outstanding contribution to music - y'know, music the artform rather than music the industry
by your reckoning Pam Ayres should be Poet Laureate
Ok...
well their contribution to music 'the artform' is evident in the fact that they've influenced more bands around today than any other...i guess that's the ultimate contribution...
Yeah, you're right...
I'd forgotten about them two still rolling on...although i struggle to consider the Who today as the Who of the 60s/70s...
yet another reminder that the brits are just an indutry tool
Fading soft-rock luddites release best of and need to get the attention of the public... give 'em an award; one of those ones that basically means "golly, you lot haven't broken up yet? well done!"
That'll help remind the punters to splash some cash on a bit of nostalgia.
I remember when the first two albums came out and if you said you didn't really like Oasis loads of people would look down their noses at you... As time passes i feel increasingly vindicated.
Congratulations.
Have a crisp.
^^^^
are you The_Glory?
No
I'm not. Are you?
...
fantastic.
They play the same 4 chords over and over.
They write the most predictable melodies known to simian kind.
As far as influence goes, somehow i dont think that a glut of shite indie bands adopting a more arsey attitude and a manc accent for a few years counts as a considerable contribution.
Massively undeserved but then, did i really expect anything else from the Brits?
That's a bit of a short-sighted argument...
Art doesn't need to be complex to be influential. You wouldn't get Picasso to draw a visually accurate portrait (firstly cos he's dead, but also because that wasn't his thing). So they weren't great musicians, but they had something which captured everyone's imagninations and made people listen to music. That's their influence.
Kele Bloc Party used to listen to them. That'll be half of you convinced...
Picasso
was able to 'draw a visually accurate portrait' at the age of 14-15. He proved his talents before he began experimenting. Oasis have never proved anything. They have been writing sub-standard plod-rock (admittedly getting lucky on a couple of occasions) since the beginning of their career.
...
im gunna concede this point.
They managed to capture the imaginations of thousands of mindless people too ignorant to look further than their nearest tabloid. Then continue to buy their later turgid records cos "It's oasis aint it".
Influence indeed.
I reckon the vast majority of people on this board own/owned definitely maybe...
...we are approaching endgame.
Oasis have proved...
...to be hugely influential. The Fratellis cite them as an influence. You like the Fratellis, it says so on your last.fm thingy.
Re: Picasso, you get my point...maybe I should have said Damien Hirst or me (although i did get a C at GCSE art)
I'm fond of
creepin' up the backastairs although after about 6 listens it's starting to piss me off slightly. Everything else I've heard by them is abysmal. But yeah, I'm sure there's other bands who like Oasis who I like. It's a bit of an obscure argument though really.
Well no,
I'm just emphasising my initial point regarding the questioning as to the vailidity of their influentionalness.
Poeple heard Oasis, were inspired, formed a band, made music, people liked it.
...
Even if they do deserve it (and I think they do), aren't there loads of other bands who deserve it more?
Having said that, didn't the Spice Girls win in a while back?
i owned it.
i sold it.
i genuinely thought they would have disappeared by now.
It baffles me why they havent and how they continue to get these awards after rehashing the first few tracks on their debut ad nauseum
You're right...
the aforementioned Stones and Who...but yes, the Spice Girls won it as did Bob cocking Geldof and Sting.
But it raises interesting questions
about artistic merit and marketability. Yes bands have been heavily influenced by Oasis - I don't think anyone can really deny that. But most of the bands who have been are chart-friendly generic indie-rock bands who appeal to the masses. They're tools that majors can rely on to make money. Should we really be celebrating this? I mean obviously there are crossovers but the vast majority of bands who would cite Oasis as a major influence are, quite frankly, not worth bothering with in my eyes.
Basically this thing about hearing oasis, forming a band and then having lots of people like your music - is it actually 'good'? The major influence Oasis seem to have had on music is making it more tame and predictable...
Thing is though...
...they have quite clearly inspired a lot of people to
a) listen to music (they were the first band I got into in a big way, back in the day),
b) play music,
c) and they are heroes to many...especially those that enjoy this kind of award ceremony...which kinda makes me think its fair enough
So I am with...
...Mr. Reckoning...well played us
Hoorah!
I have a double-choc muffin from Greggs if you care to join me Mr. Sen3tah. Then we can make out.
splendid...
...we'll both taste gooooooooood
...
It's easy - they're a simple band for people with simple tastes. The audio equivilent of My Family. It is in no way surprising that the organisers of these awards would want to honour such a band.
In ten years we'll be seeing Kasabian up there, and Reckoning's son will be on this board telling our children how "Kasabian have been such an influence to SO many bands - you can deny that FACT!"
I like it...
especially as you've assumed the moral high ground with your opening line...good work.
On a more serious note, I am, at present, without child. So if in fact a son of mine was posting on an internet board in 10 years time at the maximum age of 9 (although more likely 5/6...that's 5 or 6, not five sixths) then i'd be impressed, whatever his sentiments.
Finally, you're gay. I win.
We did thank you...
although sen3tah was a little too greedy for my liking. Shalln't be sharing with him again, oh no.
...
I have in no way assumed the moral high ground. I have assumed I have better taste. Which I do.
i didnt!
i bought different class, beautiful freak and the great escape instead. i win.
No, you LOSE.
Purely on the grounds of your Great Escape purchase.
the music world
now officially SUCKS.
fucking oasis
Bloody hell...
that's not a bad combination...again, i think that's called 'drawing on your influences'. Every band does it...even the ones you like. Sorry to be the one to break it you.
I think the only way to justify it
is if you apply the word 'outstanding' in the same sense as having an outstanding debt
...surely
any band/singer can be likened to another, no-one's gonna be truly original nowadays...
No doubt Oasis have been influenced by the aforementioned rock bands and thus such influences can be found in their sound/image. This makes them no less original than anyone else, it's just that their influences were massive acts in their own right. Also, I've no doubt it's their refusal to change that winds people up, but why should they? Back in the day they brought something more than originality and musical talent to British music, something on a cultural level and something more than any band has since, so it's only fair they get recognised for this.
Hooray!
GCSE History has its uses then, well done. You can explain that statement further if you wish...it doesn't really make much sense when you think about it...
Well, that's an influence of sorts (the kele statement) I guess, although I heard different. He probably said that after their little girly-feud.
As for your post up the page, try discussing Oasis in the context of Britain in the mid-90s, go on, I dare you.
X
No...
I replied to your's earlier. Feel free to offer you thoughts though.
X
Fair dos...
Back to the original, original point...I'm just of the opinion that their outstanding contribution to British music award is justified and is definitely more realistic a choice than those of previous years.
X
no hes not
hes a prick
people who like chart music
don't like music. That's a well-established fact.
today makes me proud to be a member of these boards
because nobody has yet pointed out that the fact that the gallaghers used to burgle houses makes them both more rock n roll AND more working class than my FACE.
Presumably
...that's outstanding as in we're still waiting for it.


Oasis
"More bands should split up" - Brett Anderson opens up to DiS about the return of Suede
Drowned in Manchester #15 – May 2013
armchair dancefloor 39: Mount Kimbie interview, Bobby Browser, Powell, Move D, Leon Vynehall...
DiS meets John Lydon - Part 1: The Man
DiS Does Singles 20.05.13: Paramore, Laura Marling, The Replacements
DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article