Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
After John Kerry twatted Dubya in the first US Presidential debate last night (thank God!), tonight's Time For Change concert at the new Marquee Club on Leicester Square has got a free guestlist, if you get in quick enough...
The acoustic bill is phenomenal: Ed Harcourt, Robyn Hitchcock, comedian Stewart Lee, Chris T-T, Darren Hayman (Hefner), Siobhan Parr, David Poe, Jimbob (Carter USM), Kathleen Haskard, The Tiny, Elizabeth Harper and a bunch of others - including good surprises - will play solo at the event.
To get on the guestlist, email membership@plummusic.com and put 'time for change' in the subject heading - and your name will be added. You'll still get asked for a donation, but that'll be up to you.
Time For Change aims to raise money and encourage London-based American ex-pats to get their fingers out and vote. But who cares, when you get to see Robyn Hitchcock for nothing.
- DiS Digest: February 2013's Album of the Month, Playlist + more...
- Buzzageddon! Brighton's Great Escape announces first names for the 2013 festival
- Ed Harcourt, Liars, Ghosting Season, Eight and a Half, Luke Abbott's LPs of 2012
- Weekend Listening: M83, SVIIB, HTDA (Trent Reznor), Chvrches, Ed Harcourt, Melody's Echo Chamber +mo
- In Photos: Summer Sundae 2012 @ De Montfort Hall, Leicester
- Stage Times: Drowned in Sound stage at Summer Sundae on Sunday
- Ed Harcourt joins Gold Panda, Japandroids, Django Django and Twilight Sad on the DiS stage at Summer
- "The eccentric & grizzled uncle I never had" - Ed Harcourt on Tom Waits
Sign Up to Post Comments
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
I'm going.
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
I would be if i was in the capital. Darren Haymnen (god) and Robyn Hitchcock at the same gig....OMG OMG!
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
yep, that is a phenomenal line up.
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
shouldn't you be focussing your attention elsewhere Mr Bush?
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Did you actually watch that debate? Bush came out pretty clearly the loser in most people's opinion and certianly mine. Look at the polls about the debate all come out largely in favour of kerry.
You'll be lucky to find anyone here who agrees with you anyway. Your arguments above are all badly-thought-out over-emotional crap - this being the worst example:
'If you're so much against the government why are you living here and funding them with your taxes and money? Fuck off if you're so much against it.'
Oh so you're saying that one is not justified in diagreeing with/protesting about the goverment's decisions unless one leaves the country altogether? what utter nonsensical bullshit. There's something called democracy which you (and bush) evidently don't understand at all.
You'll be lucky to find anyone here who agrees with you anyway. Your arguments above are all badly-thought-out over-emotional crap - this being the worst example:
'If you're so much against the government why are you living here and funding them with your taxes and money? Fuck off if you're so much against it.'
Oh so you're saying that one is not justified in diagreeing with/protesting about the goverment's decisions unless one leaves the country altogether? what utter nonsensical bullshit. There's something called democracy which you (and bush) evidently don't understand at all.
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
"I suppose you won't acknowledge the fact that Bush is now way higher than Kerry in opinion polls in the U.S. since this debate. No doubt Michael Moore hasn't mentioned this so you won't hear about it."
Well... let's look at those polls.
Before the debate CNN/USA/Gallup all had Bush well ahead with his rating in the high 50s while Kerry languished in the low 40s. After the debate Bush fell to 49% and Kerry climbed to 47%.
CBS/NY Times had a similar picture, with Bush about 10 points ahead. After the debate their pollsters found both men level on 47%.
Everything else appears to have been quite calmly and properly said by ice cream man so, back to the music...
Well... let's look at those polls.
Before the debate CNN/USA/Gallup all had Bush well ahead with his rating in the high 50s while Kerry languished in the low 40s. After the debate Bush fell to 49% and Kerry climbed to 47%.
CBS/NY Times had a similar picture, with Bush about 10 points ahead. After the debate their pollsters found both men level on 47%.
Everything else appears to have been quite calmly and properly said by ice cream man so, back to the music...
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Japan-
learn how to construct an argument.
study the use of logic and reason.
attempt to engage with some of the basic elements of humanity.
read a thousand opinions before you consider giving another one.
good luck!
learn how to construct an argument.
study the use of logic and reason.
attempt to engage with some of the basic elements of humanity.
read a thousand opinions before you consider giving another one.
good luck!
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Well said, that man.
Japan, you clearly are a moron with little or no grasp of the way the world works, nor can you articulate your ideas.
Japan, you clearly are a moron with little or no grasp of the way the world works, nor can you articulate your ideas.
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
you are obviously obsessed by this michael moore character. maybe if you took your head out of your arse for one second you might twig that no-one but you has mentioned him. seeing as no-one on the knowledgeable left give an amazing amount of credence to Moore's theories- beyond the fun we get out of him winding up ignorant people like you- i think it's safe to say you are on the wrong tack. if you want to persuade people of something, you might want to get a decent handle of what they actually think in the first place. but i guess that would burst your safe little bubble.
having said that, seeing as every post you have made has been in this thread, i suspect that you are little more than a troll. you're quite entertaining, but not a serious contender.
having said that, seeing as every post you have made has been in this thread, i suspect that you are little more than a troll. you're quite entertaining, but not a serious contender.
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
*feels righteous* :)
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Maybe Japan is going to step into Againstthegrain's shoes and continue his pointless trolling.
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
oooh, let's hope so. ;)
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Classic example of badly thought-out fallacious debating style... lots of ad hominem attacks straw man arguments and very little actual logic. Insulting the other side of an argument and calling them a lier is all too easy. Do you have any good arguments for why the war in Iraq is a good idea? You admit yourself that you 'don't know the full story of these topics'. So why on earth should we listen to you?
FYI I have a lot of respect for some of the stuff blair has done for the country, but on Iraq I disagree with him. It's not a token disagreement, it's not me trying to be rebellious, or whatever other lame justification you seem to think all in opposition to the war share, it's a disagreement based on a logical analysis of the facts and information available to me, something you haven't yet proved yourself capable of. Instead you seem obsessed about insulting some great left-wing conspiracy you see in your head, acheiving very little in the process.
On a matter of fact, here are some links to polls taken by large US TV networks and pollsters after the debate, showing kerry coming out ontop:
Kerry tops bush in debate:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/01/debate.poll/
Poll: kerry wins debate
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/debate_poll_040930.html
Kerry wins debate:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=13237
Please don't waste anyone's time replying unless you want to talk about facts and justify your opinions with logical arguments based on the actual issues. Just ranting and swearing at people isn't going to convince anyone that you're right.
FYI I have a lot of respect for some of the stuff blair has done for the country, but on Iraq I disagree with him. It's not a token disagreement, it's not me trying to be rebellious, or whatever other lame justification you seem to think all in opposition to the war share, it's a disagreement based on a logical analysis of the facts and information available to me, something you haven't yet proved yourself capable of. Instead you seem obsessed about insulting some great left-wing conspiracy you see in your head, acheiving very little in the process.
On a matter of fact, here are some links to polls taken by large US TV networks and pollsters after the debate, showing kerry coming out ontop:
Kerry tops bush in debate:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/01/debate.poll/
Poll: kerry wins debate
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/debate_poll_040930.html
Kerry wins debate:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/?ci=13237
Please don't waste anyone's time replying unless you want to talk about facts and justify your opinions with logical arguments based on the actual issues. Just ranting and swearing at people isn't going to convince anyone that you're right.
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
You're right though I should have justified the little swipe about bush not understanding democracy. I was refering to the many undemocratic provisions he slipped in after 9/11 in the PATRIOT act (can provide more details if you actually give a shit), his imprisonment and torture of suspected terrorists without trial, his many breaches of international law, the geneva convention etc.
Essentially - you CANNOT take the moral high ground about freedom, democracy and law elsewhere unless you act in a free democratic and lawful way in your own country and in your dealings with others. This means giving people proper trials, not torturing people, not breaking international law, etc.
Essentially - you CANNOT take the moral high ground about freedom, democracy and law elsewhere unless you act in a free democratic and lawful way in your own country and in your dealings with others. This means giving people proper trials, not torturing people, not breaking international law, etc.
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Argh! I have tried to resist but I can't.
What is wrong with ousting a psycopathic dictator? Nothing.
What is completely wrong is the way the Bush administration has gone about it.
They invaded Iraq with no clear idea what they were getting themselves into. As a result a lot of people (that's innocent, everyday people) have died and been maimed and traumatised and the country has fallen into chaos.
It is a power vaccuum which has been filled by militants, extremists and, yes, terrorists. The very people Mr Bush says he is fighting a war against. Sadly he has instead created the conditions in which such people thrive.
Who suffers? The Iraqi people (yes, they were suffering before, surely they now deserve a fucking break) and the youung troops who have to fight and die there every day in constant fear.
Abu Graib? An absolute disgrace. What happened in that prison is an affront to the common humanity I and I believe Japan share. The same goes for the way people are held without trial (hold them, Japan, but let's have natural, human justice at least) in Guantanamo Bay and Belmarsh Prison.
These abuses and daily brutalities turn people against the west, they undermine "The War on Terror" (which is at best a naive mistake and at worst an Orwellian perma-war nightmare serving only the military-industrial complex) and make the world a more insecure, brutal and paranoid place in which the things we all value are harder to find.
In more general terms I dislike Bush; I think he's an arrogant and reactionary child. I disagree with his views on abortion, on gay rights, etc, etc. That is my tough. I can't do anything about it. That's up to the American people who I pray to God will remember why they were once respected and even loved by many around the world and will throw him out before he squanders a century and more of good will towards their country.
What soes bug me are the actions which affetc us all. That includes Iraq and it includes Kyoto. We all breath the same air, mate and it's getting dirtier. Yes, I could get on my bike - we all share responsibility. That includes Bush - he could do something about it but tragically he doesn't see it.
Japan, your response?
Sorry this is so long but there was a lot to cover...
What is wrong with ousting a psycopathic dictator? Nothing.
What is completely wrong is the way the Bush administration has gone about it.
They invaded Iraq with no clear idea what they were getting themselves into. As a result a lot of people (that's innocent, everyday people) have died and been maimed and traumatised and the country has fallen into chaos.
It is a power vaccuum which has been filled by militants, extremists and, yes, terrorists. The very people Mr Bush says he is fighting a war against. Sadly he has instead created the conditions in which such people thrive.
Who suffers? The Iraqi people (yes, they were suffering before, surely they now deserve a fucking break) and the youung troops who have to fight and die there every day in constant fear.
Abu Graib? An absolute disgrace. What happened in that prison is an affront to the common humanity I and I believe Japan share. The same goes for the way people are held without trial (hold them, Japan, but let's have natural, human justice at least) in Guantanamo Bay and Belmarsh Prison.
These abuses and daily brutalities turn people against the west, they undermine "The War on Terror" (which is at best a naive mistake and at worst an Orwellian perma-war nightmare serving only the military-industrial complex) and make the world a more insecure, brutal and paranoid place in which the things we all value are harder to find.
In more general terms I dislike Bush; I think he's an arrogant and reactionary child. I disagree with his views on abortion, on gay rights, etc, etc. That is my tough. I can't do anything about it. That's up to the American people who I pray to God will remember why they were once respected and even loved by many around the world and will throw him out before he squanders a century and more of good will towards their country.
What soes bug me are the actions which affetc us all. That includes Iraq and it includes Kyoto. We all breath the same air, mate and it's getting dirtier. Yes, I could get on my bike - we all share responsibility. That includes Bush - he could do something about it but tragically he doesn't see it.
Japan, your response?
Sorry this is so long but there was a lot to cover...
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Shame on you Durutti, you forgot to tell Japan he's a twat for picking up on other's spelling mistakes ('Loosing') and then spelling Zimbabwe incorrectly four times. Good points otherwise though.
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
i don't get that music journo reference at all! i really think you should read people's posts more carefully. there's no point having an argument if you've already made up your mind.
and ooh, when talking about 'points' you may soon realise that 'NOB!!!!' is not a point, an argument, or indeed even intelligible.
i suggest you go back to the drawing board and, yes, learn how to construct an argument. as it stands, you are little more than a troll.
and ooh, when talking about 'points' you may soon realise that 'NOB!!!!' is not a point, an argument, or indeed even intelligible.
i suggest you go back to the drawing board and, yes, learn how to construct an argument. as it stands, you are little more than a troll.
Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Just discovered this delightful and insightful thread so I'll add me two penneth:
On the war: Getting rid of Sadaam Hussein was undoubtably a good thing, but the more I think about it it's the ONLY good thing that has come from the whole debacle. And I honestly don't know whether Iraq (and the world at large) might have been better off if he was still running the show there.
Thinking about it, just what has replaced his tyranny? Some things I can think of are:
1.More tyranny under the rouse of democracy, granted a different and arguably 'better' form of tyranny, but tyranny is still tyranny.
2.Chaos on the streets of Bagdad, Basra and other parts of the Arab world.
3. Lots of Good and Evil people royally pissed off about the whole thing. With lots of Evil people plotting God knows what as a result.
4. Cynical money making opportunities for already rich westerners (not just with oil, but with other things, in particular Construction, too).
5. Subsequent kidnappings and inhumane killings of said money motivated opportunist westerners that the already rich media hi-jack for their own financially motivated reasons.
6. Everyone getting royally pissed off with a political party that is actually quite good overall- war aside- and our country moving dangerously close to a Lib/Lab coallition government after the next election (it will happen kidz, I am a soothsayer) and the ensuing chaos that it'll bring.
7. Loads of politically minded bright- if misguided- young people joining evil political parties like the BNP and particularly the Conservative party (just watch their conference on TV for evidence) as well as increased membership and public appreciation for mickey mouse parties like the Liberal Democrats, SWP, Plaid Cymru, SNP and UKIP. This happens because the kidz are being taught to hate Labour by every mode of influence out there (regardless of whether that influence is left, right or middle).
8. Neglect of other equally or more important political, national, international and social issues by the political media, governments and electorates alike.
All these things considered, from a utilitarian point of view, if Sadam was still in charge of Iraq and there was no war in the first place, I'm inclined to think that maybe things'd be a lot better for a lot more people out there (even if it meant that the people of Iraq were still enduring his evil).
I really must say though, even though that Japan guy is evidently a right wing crotch pheasant, he had one amazingly excellent point:
Everyone seems to have a whole lotta political passion and knowledge and obviously a lotta people are genuinely concerned for the country and the world at large, yet, what the fuck is everyone doing about it?????
Going on camp student or far-left protests, no matter how good the intensions are, won't achieve anything good or worthwhile.
Voting against Labour in any given election or abstaining from voting alltogether won't achieve anything good or worthwhile (and at the moment it's also definitely debatable whether voting FOR Labour will achieve anything good or worthwhile).
I implore everyone of the left-wing ilk with passion and a political mind to join the Labour party, seek political office and reclaim what is a historically marvellous institution back from the Fools and Tories who now control it (having had the enlightening experience of meeting Tony Blair recently I am now of the opinion that he is both a Fool and a Tory- but not an evil person).
Being a mere Armchair Socialist will achieve nothing good or worthwhile. Becoming a truly Socialist and benevolent Labour politician will.
And it's easier than you think:
I myself ran for council as the official Labour candidate for my home district in June and polled 1913 votes. I didn't get elected though, cos just over 2000 or so other people voted for the same tired, old, famously incompetent Lib Dem candidate instead, purely as a gesture against Blair and the war.
Next election time I will stand again and hopefully things'll turn out different. Even if they don't, I WILL keep on trying.
If you've got a beef with the government and politics in general and you despise social injustice THEN FOR FUCK'S SAKE GET UP OF YOUR FAT ARSE AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Don't just sound off articulately and insightfully on internet messageboards! Actions speak louder than words.
People are sufferring all around us and are in need of our help. We might not be able to stop it all but maybe we can stop some of it (or even most of it). I'm game for a fight (against social injustice) are you?
Rant Dunn
On the war: Getting rid of Sadaam Hussein was undoubtably a good thing, but the more I think about it it's the ONLY good thing that has come from the whole debacle. And I honestly don't know whether Iraq (and the world at large) might have been better off if he was still running the show there.
Thinking about it, just what has replaced his tyranny? Some things I can think of are:
1.More tyranny under the rouse of democracy, granted a different and arguably 'better' form of tyranny, but tyranny is still tyranny.
2.Chaos on the streets of Bagdad, Basra and other parts of the Arab world.
3. Lots of Good and Evil people royally pissed off about the whole thing. With lots of Evil people plotting God knows what as a result.
4. Cynical money making opportunities for already rich westerners (not just with oil, but with other things, in particular Construction, too).
5. Subsequent kidnappings and inhumane killings of said money motivated opportunist westerners that the already rich media hi-jack for their own financially motivated reasons.
6. Everyone getting royally pissed off with a political party that is actually quite good overall- war aside- and our country moving dangerously close to a Lib/Lab coallition government after the next election (it will happen kidz, I am a soothsayer) and the ensuing chaos that it'll bring.
7. Loads of politically minded bright- if misguided- young people joining evil political parties like the BNP and particularly the Conservative party (just watch their conference on TV for evidence) as well as increased membership and public appreciation for mickey mouse parties like the Liberal Democrats, SWP, Plaid Cymru, SNP and UKIP. This happens because the kidz are being taught to hate Labour by every mode of influence out there (regardless of whether that influence is left, right or middle).
8. Neglect of other equally or more important political, national, international and social issues by the political media, governments and electorates alike.
All these things considered, from a utilitarian point of view, if Sadam was still in charge of Iraq and there was no war in the first place, I'm inclined to think that maybe things'd be a lot better for a lot more people out there (even if it meant that the people of Iraq were still enduring his evil).
I really must say though, even though that Japan guy is evidently a right wing crotch pheasant, he had one amazingly excellent point:
Everyone seems to have a whole lotta political passion and knowledge and obviously a lotta people are genuinely concerned for the country and the world at large, yet, what the fuck is everyone doing about it?????
Going on camp student or far-left protests, no matter how good the intensions are, won't achieve anything good or worthwhile.
Voting against Labour in any given election or abstaining from voting alltogether won't achieve anything good or worthwhile (and at the moment it's also definitely debatable whether voting FOR Labour will achieve anything good or worthwhile).
I implore everyone of the left-wing ilk with passion and a political mind to join the Labour party, seek political office and reclaim what is a historically marvellous institution back from the Fools and Tories who now control it (having had the enlightening experience of meeting Tony Blair recently I am now of the opinion that he is both a Fool and a Tory- but not an evil person).
Being a mere Armchair Socialist will achieve nothing good or worthwhile. Becoming a truly Socialist and benevolent Labour politician will.
And it's easier than you think:
I myself ran for council as the official Labour candidate for my home district in June and polled 1913 votes. I didn't get elected though, cos just over 2000 or so other people voted for the same tired, old, famously incompetent Lib Dem candidate instead, purely as a gesture against Blair and the war.
Next election time I will stand again and hopefully things'll turn out different. Even if they don't, I WILL keep on trying.
If you've got a beef with the government and politics in general and you despise social injustice THEN FOR FUCK'S SAKE GET UP OF YOUR FAT ARSE AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Don't just sound off articulately and insightfully on internet messageboards! Actions speak louder than words.
People are sufferring all around us and are in need of our help. We might not be able to stop it all but maybe we can stop some of it (or even most of it). I'm game for a fight (against social injustice) are you?
Rant Dunn
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Neil, I'm terribly sorry for any precieved impertinence, but did you read my post?
I did say protesting was futile, I did say the present Labour Executive is shit and full of Tory Pricks (with obvious exceptions like Peter "Please, please, please be our next PM - oh God if only!" Hain).
You said you want the party to:
"realign with its core support and gear up for a real fight for social injustice, not one based on the fudged compromise of socialism and free-market economics"
That was the whole point of my post! There's no point in just saying these things! Become a member and make it happen! Fight the shitheads from within the beast!
If you're such a Socialist you SHOULD be doing this sort of thing! As a Cambridge student that makes you one of the most gifted young individuals in the country, you should use your mind and skills to "fight social injustice" as you yourself describe. If people like YOU don't get involved then more Tories like Blair will!
Seriously man, as a gifted Socialist intellectual do you honestly not feel any sense of responsibility towards those on the recieving end of the dogshite that the system throws at them?
As Edmund Burke once said:
"The only thing neccessary for the triumph of Evil is for Good men to do nothing" (and no, the irony that he was himself a Tory isn't lost on me...)
People like you CAN make a difference if you so choose...
I did say protesting was futile, I did say the present Labour Executive is shit and full of Tory Pricks (with obvious exceptions like Peter "Please, please, please be our next PM - oh God if only!" Hain).
You said you want the party to:
"realign with its core support and gear up for a real fight for social injustice, not one based on the fudged compromise of socialism and free-market economics"
That was the whole point of my post! There's no point in just saying these things! Become a member and make it happen! Fight the shitheads from within the beast!
If you're such a Socialist you SHOULD be doing this sort of thing! As a Cambridge student that makes you one of the most gifted young individuals in the country, you should use your mind and skills to "fight social injustice" as you yourself describe. If people like YOU don't get involved then more Tories like Blair will!
Seriously man, as a gifted Socialist intellectual do you honestly not feel any sense of responsibility towards those on the recieving end of the dogshite that the system throws at them?
As Edmund Burke once said:
"The only thing neccessary for the triumph of Evil is for Good men to do nothing" (and no, the irony that he was himself a Tory isn't lost on me...)
People like you CAN make a difference if you so choose...
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Tony Benn couldn't win an election, true. But somebody Left of Blair but Right of Benn COULD. Definitely.
"but you're asking me to fall back in love with the past ideology of a party that has abandoned it in favour of cheap political points. and that puts me in an impossible position.. "
That is the precise gargantuan error that a student of politics will always make. Mistaking the nature of the executive for the nature of the party as a whole. I've met dozens of MPs and hundreds of grassroots party members and believe me, "past ideogies" as you so misguidedly put it, are alive and well in the Labour party and clost to a massive ejaculation of a comeback.
But then, as an outsider and theoritician, not directly involved, you can't be expected to know that, "Mere Prattle not Practice" in the words of Shakespeare's Iago (and, again, the irony of me quoting a dedicated follower of Machiavelli isn't lost on me, but the quote is more than pertinent).
You should really shed your naive and unfounded prejudices they so don't suit someone so otherwise erudite...
"but you're asking me to fall back in love with the past ideology of a party that has abandoned it in favour of cheap political points. and that puts me in an impossible position.. "
That is the precise gargantuan error that a student of politics will always make. Mistaking the nature of the executive for the nature of the party as a whole. I've met dozens of MPs and hundreds of grassroots party members and believe me, "past ideogies" as you so misguidedly put it, are alive and well in the Labour party and clost to a massive ejaculation of a comeback.
But then, as an outsider and theoritician, not directly involved, you can't be expected to know that, "Mere Prattle not Practice" in the words of Shakespeare's Iago (and, again, the irony of me quoting a dedicated follower of Machiavelli isn't lost on me, but the quote is more than pertinent).
You should really shed your naive and unfounded prejudices they so don't suit someone so otherwise erudite...
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
Japan: If you believe so much in the war on terror why aren't you there in Iraq fighting on the front line?
Re: Time For Change tonight: free guestlist
"I DO understand that the grassroots of a party is different from those controlling it"
That's fine then, only I saw no evidence of it until your most recent post.
You are entirely right, of course, the Labour Left is in an impossible situation at the mo, rocking the boat for all the good it'd do, may also end up in disaster. And being as though things ain't completely evil in the executive as yet and the election has't happenned yet, people are in limbo and are waiting to see exactly what it is that unfolds in the ensuing 24 months.
"To use your own words, often 'prattle' leads to 'practice.' A guy called Antony Giddens writes a few books advocating a new form of politics called the "Third Way," and in a few years a young leader of the opposition changes the name of his party and uses this theory as the basis on which he wants to govern. A guy called Francis Fukuyama writes a book advocating the spread of "American values" across the globe. A few years later it gets siezed upon by some neo-con intellectuals as the basis to bomb the fuck out of the Middle East."
That I will concede, but in this day and age people who read 'proper' books are few and far between and great political commentary is as sparse as fit birds at an all boys public school. If you feel you can write an insightful book on political theory that loads of people can read (eg a more erudite, pragmatic version of stupid white men, dude where's my country etc) then go ahead and do it :)
That is an ENTIRELY worthwhile Socialist cause, one I wouldn't be capable of myself having only a modest university education in a subject other than politics. But for God's sake don't make it overly esoteric, make it wholly accessible! Make it tie in with the zeitgeist and make people WANT to read it!
"I do really admire your commitment though - it can't be easy being a Labour activist at the moment"
Thank you for your empathy. You are again right. On a few occassions I've almost had to do the whole Saint Peter thing and distance myself from the thing I love and believe in, cos in some environments folk just wouldn't understand- given what they read in the shitty press- and I just ain't spoilin' for an argument. That is a large part of my reason for involvement though, I want to make the Labour party something that present generations are proud to be associated with.
When I was out doorstep campaigning I spoke to a whole lot of old people, and the romance and pride they attribute to the Labour party as a virtuous organisation is quite overwhelming. I want it to be that way once again and always and I'll do whatever it takes to make it happen....
That's fine then, only I saw no evidence of it until your most recent post.
You are entirely right, of course, the Labour Left is in an impossible situation at the mo, rocking the boat for all the good it'd do, may also end up in disaster. And being as though things ain't completely evil in the executive as yet and the election has't happenned yet, people are in limbo and are waiting to see exactly what it is that unfolds in the ensuing 24 months.
"To use your own words, often 'prattle' leads to 'practice.' A guy called Antony Giddens writes a few books advocating a new form of politics called the "Third Way," and in a few years a young leader of the opposition changes the name of his party and uses this theory as the basis on which he wants to govern. A guy called Francis Fukuyama writes a book advocating the spread of "American values" across the globe. A few years later it gets siezed upon by some neo-con intellectuals as the basis to bomb the fuck out of the Middle East."
That I will concede, but in this day and age people who read 'proper' books are few and far between and great political commentary is as sparse as fit birds at an all boys public school. If you feel you can write an insightful book on political theory that loads of people can read (eg a more erudite, pragmatic version of stupid white men, dude where's my country etc) then go ahead and do it :)
That is an ENTIRELY worthwhile Socialist cause, one I wouldn't be capable of myself having only a modest university education in a subject other than politics. But for God's sake don't make it overly esoteric, make it wholly accessible! Make it tie in with the zeitgeist and make people WANT to read it!
"I do really admire your commitment though - it can't be easy being a Labour activist at the moment"
Thank you for your empathy. You are again right. On a few occassions I've almost had to do the whole Saint Peter thing and distance myself from the thing I love and believe in, cos in some environments folk just wouldn't understand- given what they read in the shitty press- and I just ain't spoilin' for an argument. That is a large part of my reason for involvement though, I want to make the Labour party something that present generations are proud to be associated with.
When I was out doorstep campaigning I spoke to a whole lot of old people, and the romance and pride they attribute to the Labour party as a virtuous organisation is quite overwhelming. I want it to be that way once again and always and I'll do whatever it takes to make it happen....
Sign Up to Post Comments
Add your comment
Reply

Ed Harcourt
Chris T-T
Champion Sound #13: Part 1 – Ten Yeezus Pieces
Parklife Weekender 2013 – The Drowned in Sound Review
Drowned In Sheffield #14
DiS Does Singles 17.06.13: Dornik, Washed Out, AlunaGeorge
All Hail the Culturati... Fighting Over Radiohead's Hail to the Thief
Cutting Through the Noise: What it's really like representing new artists at events like The Great Escape
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article