- Artists:
- Blood Red Shoes »
- Cat On Form »
With a new album filled with life-disrupting guitars waiting in the wings, who better to ponder the apparent 'problems' with 'rock music' than Steven Ansell, one half of DiS-favourites Blood Red Shoes...
HARD TIMES FOR GUITAR MUSIC?
There's been a bit of a fuss lately about the future of guitar music (e.g. Label boss is 'concerned' over future of guitar music | BBC). This got me thinking about what exactly is going on right now....
It seems to me that the real story here is that there are two ways that "rock music" seems to break into the mainstream and “succeed”. When major labels sign a new band for a big whack of money and agree to a huge recording and promotion budget, the onus is on them (via parent company/shareholders/good ol' capitalism) to get a financial return as fast as possible. So their approach is to take a basically unknown act and the force it downstream to The Public at the speed of light. I call this a top-down approach, for obvious reasons. It's a few people up there at the top of the pyramid with all the investment money picking a band and then pushing it downwards onto real people, hoping to make some bucks. For rock music, this almost never works. If it does, it's so totally unsustainable and short-term that the band rarely gets past that first album. It's like people suddenly realize they've been duped by marketing and jump ship.
Now the really successful rock music acts (success defined in terms of selling a bunch of records and playing big places, not successful in the sense that they necessarily achieve what they want artistically) starts from The Public and flows upwards from bottom to top. The bands who really break through into the bigtime have spent a long time building up an audience outside of the major label structure, through playing live and usually through independent labels, who despite having limited resources are way more prepared to take risks on bands. It's a much slower process but it means bands can develop and improve, sorta like Rocky training for the big fight. Muse for example, were bumped about between a bunch of labels before they really hit it big, and had been touring all over the world. The Black Keys have just sold out three nights at the 10,000-capacity Alexandra Palace after years of touring and putting out about a million records on various indies. Biffy Clyro put three albums out “under the radar” on Beggars Banquet before smashing it with Puzzle, Arcade Fire started out as a lowly Rough Trade band...Nirvana did not play two gigs at the Flowerpot in London and start an A&R scrum, know what I mean?
Yet the bands that a major label chooses to put its force behind? Joe Lean and the Jing Jang Jong. The Twang. Glasvegas. The Drums. Brother. And now, Spector. ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? When you look at it like that, of course it looks bleak for the future of guitar music. It's because major labels have a chronic inability to pick decent fucking bands. The recent couple of (chart) success stories like The Vaccines and You Me At Six give an insight to the kind of bands they're keeping an eye on – standardized, preset-rock that's so characterless and safe it's like they've been generated by some secret new piece of software locked away in the basement of the Universal building.
The way I see it is here's the problem: The Public at large love guitar music just as much as ever. The tidal wave of successful reformations is testament to that (The Pixies, Blur, My Bloody Valentine, Black Sabbath, Stone Roses, even At the Drive-In now). But access to anything decent is totally masked by the weight of promotion thrown at bands that are never going to connect to a wider audience because they're just no damn good. The great guitar music of the future, that much-needed “shot in the arm”, the exciting shit, is brewing up all over the place, but only a very very tiny amount is getting through that glass ceiling into the big leagues because that surface space is being taken up. Couple that with a novelty-obsessed media (this week! 55 new bands! All with terrible names!) where bands are immediately considered irrelevant after they've released one EP, and we have a structure that makes it very disheartening and difficult for bands to keep working at it long-term, building themselves up to that critical mass where they “crossover” (ewwwwww†).
To their credit, Radio 1 are playing more independent rock than ever - you can hear bands like Twin Atlantic or Pulled Apart By Horses on primetime slots, and I think this is a valuable starting point. But until the dominance of the major-label-backed short-term rich-kids-dabbling-in-rock-n-roll is properly broken, where do we look to? Well my eyes are on the bands around the fringes, just below the surface, the ones with the hunger for it, the ones who won't quit. Because in this climate only the really dedicated bands are going to make it through the net.
† = actually, in truth, I think bands “crossing over” can be a great thing when done right, I'd never have found the Jesus Lizard if Nirvana hadn't sold out would I?
Previously: Blood Red Shoes: From DIY to 'Professional' by Steven Ansell
Blood Red Shoes new track 'Cold' is available to hear HERE in a news story that also includes UK tour dates and info about their forthcoming album In Time To Voices.
- In Photos: Blood Red Shoes @ Shepherds Bush Empire
- Blood Red Shoes - Water
- Blood Red Shoes - Water
- Drowned in Sound's Favourite Albums of 2012: 50-26
- Watch: Blood Red Shoes 'In Time to Voices'
- In Photos: Leeds Festival 2012 - Day 3 @ Bramham Park, Leeds
- Leeds Festival 2012: Drowned In Sound's Sunday blog
- Reading & Leeds 2012 - DiS' Must See Acts
incoming
common-sense bomb.
great article.
tempted to offer Steven a column
especially because it could be entitled Blood Red Sense
this is a good article
but if i remember right joe lean and the jing jang jong weren't actually that bad, nor were they backed by a massive label (did they even ever release an album?)
Interesting Read
The whole 'rich boys taking over' mentality can be used to reflect the dire situation in other styes of popular music too. Especially electronic. But I won't go down the name calling route.
The industry and the thirst for money making has changed. It's gotten quicker, more aggressive and less patient - with a heavy emphasis on making a profit as quickly as possible, and little care for long term investment.
I think in the 90s artists could expect 4-5 album deals and a 10 plus year relationship with their label. Their financial gain was something to be monitored over time.
But I'll say this: I don't blame the so called dinosaur label bosses. Not one bit. Were all these dinosaur label bosses around when so many great records were released in the 70s, 80s and 90s? I think so. Even if all they did was stump up the cash. If I am to blame anybody - I blame the YOUNG know-it-all's who now run taste making blogs and record labels. Not only are many of these people small minded and extremely arrogant, they seem to visualize their power as the arbiters of taste for millions of young people.
I wouldn't call it 'name-calling'.
It's accurate, is all, but more importantly, it is pertinent as one has to wonder about how diverse music made largely by one social quotient could be. Obviously, middle-class white boys have always thrived in music, but it was more open before than it is now.
contrary opinionbot here
Hi!
with record company fortunes dwindling it's unlikely that they're going to invest money into bands who one day might write something which could hypothetically earn them money. they're not pro gamblers - they're business men.
muse & biffy only got big when they started writing mainstream slop because they got fed up with not getting paid enough.
the thirst for reformed guitar bands is more to do with people reliving their youth and wanted to be a part of something they've read countless journalists write about since.
i saw the pixies play at a massive cricket ground, i bet less than 1% go and watch unsigned guitar bands.
agree with the sentiment
But Muse weren't on a load of different labels, they were on one label that was merged/bought/swapped hence the change of label names over the years. Also, 'Arcade Fire started as a lowly Rough Trade band' - aren't they still on Rough Trade? And wasn't their debut album, if I remember rightly, a huge seller on its' first release? Might help the argument to pick better examples.
I do generally agree and like 'Cold' though.
disagree
the likes of Muse, Snow Patrol and Feeder definitely did their time playing the likes of Southampton Joiners and Hull Adelphi (was it Muse or Feeder that wore orange boiler suits onstage though...?) but do we really expect to see another hyped up thrust-into-HMV album from Yuck and Joy Formids since they've blown all their cash on over-promoting them in 2011? Doubt it.
And we really need a Cat On Form reunion sometime Steve. Supporting ATD-I preferably.
at the drive-in
i promised myself i wouldn't get into a load of debating on here so my only reply is...I would fucking love to play with at the drive-in. or at least see them again. but cat on form ain't gonna reform i'm afraid. well, not until coachella offer us a million dollars anyway.
The future of guitar music is in not 'making it'.
I agree with a lot of what Steven Ansell says. I'm not going to analyse the industry here, I just want to share some lessons-learned with you guys...
I think that the focus needs to stay on the product and the audience. Forget the music business as much as you can afford to, they really are just opportunistic investors.
I think most successful artists forget about 'making it'. This will help keep the 'art' in the music alive and relevant to the audience. It will also keep you sane. Get this right and yes, of course you'll get the media attention and the investors. But, forget the art that made you famous at your peril.
How the A&R people hear about you is important. If you've forgotten about 'making it' then you're gonna appear more attractive. I think the more you ignore the business and concentrate on your art the more attractive you get. It's a bit catch 22. Also, ignore the blog journos, they are simply too busy or egotistical or both that they have lost all sense of humanity and 'touch'. Don't forget they really need your good 'art' to look important too.
As for guitars? People are fascinated by guitar music. It seems very human, emotional, enduring. I don't mind (and am guilty of) some era-hopping retro guitar sounds so long as it paints the right picture or nostalgic feeling and isn't a plaintive rip-off of the 60s (we don't fly Spitfires any more but they're very popular on History Channel). The top 10 selling albums of all time include many guitar musos so the appetite is there. If the song itself is catchy, has some clever or catchy guitar work and the lyrics aren't shite then the audience will love it.
Ahh, that's better, think I'll have a lie down now...
BTW, I really like the Little Red Shoes.
Damon Dwyer
re: an article by a totally unbiased musician
Difficult to take an article on whether or not guitar music is in good shape seriously when it's written by a member of a band. Let alone from a member of Blood Red Shoes.
Things that irritated me about this article? Let's see for a start he seems to think The Drums and the Twang are both at the same level.
The Drums seem to be used as an example of what's wrong with guitar music. They an obvious target for frustrated musicians/blog writers because they actually became fairly well known really quickly.
Oh no how could they? That's not fair I wanna be big too. Damn them! Maybe I should act like a frustrated musician and say ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?
The bit about 'rich kids' making it big with major label backing is really annoying too.
If I was only allowed to listen to poor peoples music I would have to listen to Oasis or The Enemy. Oh dear god no.
Clearly he is unsure if he wants his band to crossover anyway as he finds it very 'Ewwwww'
Frankly I don't care is a band is formed by rich or poor people. I don't interpret music as class warfare. I actually just listen to the music.
Muse seemed to make it big by constant touring and making more music but it took a while before they garnered 'crossover' success. So there is hope for Blood Red Shoes yet.
Well maybe. I'm not sure if they've got a Matt Bellamy in the band.

DiS Missive: Can't we all just get along?
Local Knowledge: Blood Red Shoes' Brighton City Guide
In Photos: Summer Sundae 2011 @ De Montford Hall & Gardens, Leicester
Blood Red Shoes
Cat On Form
"More bands should split up" - Brett Anderson opens up to DiS about the return of Suede
Drowned in Manchester #15 – May 2013
armchair dancefloor 39: Mount Kimbie interview, Bobby Browser, Powell, Move D, Leon Vynehall...
DiS meets John Lydon - Part 1: The Man
DiS Does Singles 20.05.13: Paramore, Laura Marling, The Replacements
DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article