Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
I've been trying to find the answer for the past hour or so. What's the indie consensus?
It's really hot and I need to know my opinion on this ASAP.
I really don't know. My post-war European history is really sketchy.
seems quite good
in a letter to Stalin:
"Stop sending people to kill me. We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle (...) If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send one to Moscow, and I won't have to send a second."
You can do better.
Did some great plumbing at Buckingham Palace, obviously.
although they obviously didn't like the censorship side of the regime, they are pretty reverent of him as they had jobs/homes under his leadership and had money to travel around Europe, whereas post-Tito their countries have struggled to adapt to capitalism and there's less disposable income. that said, I think national self-determination was fairly important to them. so... in the eyes of ex-Yugoslavs, Tito = good, Yugoslavia = bad? p sure Tito's mausoleum in Belgrade is pretty popular too (didn't see it)
also, where do I cash in my indie points?
Gone within a decade...