Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
20 ELSE RELATIONSHIP END
30 GO TO 10
Seems like an overly BASIC assessment.
cos some people get off on looking at fitties and some people get off on being looked at because they're a fittie
keep up the good work
hotness + success/ability + personality + SOH = n.
You must both be n.
the size of your heart
Except: it is. Being impressed by someone is attractive. I put success/ability because I think it can be either/or. Some people are attracted to success, others are attracted to how good someone is at something whether they're worried about success or not.
that's kind of what i mean.
There's an 'x-factor' that rounds out to one of these things. Ambition, motivation, energy, ability all sort of fit, success doesn't have to be anything other than success in the other's eyes, either.
i thnk only psychopaths would be attracted to such a thing
is that classified as a 'personality' trait?
Although people who don't love animals should have some kind of 'AVOID' sign above their head. What kind of shit doesn't love animals?
Like I wouldn't wanna go out with someone that goes "awwwwwwwwwwwww!" when they watch this video of an owl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqiyeGKlINQ
they'd have to have a very specific expression on their face
More the kind of face that is saying 'animals are fucking excellent aren't they?' - that's what I want from sending someone a link to something about bees.
people are different and find different things attractive
Do you not find ability/skill in something attractive though? Genuine question, coz that's interesting.
but this sort of post is a good example of someone loving animals in a way that I don't find particularly attractive. I know you wont care cause you probably have your own specifications that I don't meet either. Was just using it as an example of why it's not as simple as a question of whether someone loves animals.
just admit it
You and your boyfriend are n.
and was disfigured or something? would we have to end it?
Perhaps their sense of humour would compensate.
Have you possibly cottoned on to the fact that I might have never been 100 per cent serious that there's a mathematical formula based on very vague subheadings to dictate the wonderful glory of love?
I'm almost positive that finding ability attractive is a a majority thing. Isn't it? Maybe I've just always assumed that.
Like: my girlfriend can dance ballet better than I've ever seen, and even little glimpses of what she's capable of make my jaw drop, and it does something funny to my head.
But then again, maybe it's because it's her that's doing it, that I find that attractive in the first place. Idk.
I think it's interesting though.
so someone being able to do something makes them more attractive?
having a skill/ability in something is, to me, attractive.
But maybe that's just because it displays ambition/dedication to learning or something.
or blow jobs?
i might be wearing the old username, but I've gotten a bit more mature about what i do and don't share since i first created that account.
and this is a non-issue.
Anyone can learn to do something. Not sure anyone can learn to be attractive to you.
I think you can admire someone's ability in something but it seems odd to me that this would weigh on the, "why I'm in love with my wife," stakes and I'd guess if I put it in those terms, you'd probably agree you're not in love with her because she's an amazing ballet dancer?
i think maybe it's attaining that level of skill in something that displays properties that i find attractive regardless of what they have learned specifically.
Because your last sentence is correct, sure. But her dedication to becoming as good as she is, is i think one of the things that attracted me at first.
but not the owl
I definitely hired the wrong mods.
MODS! Promote Theo again so he can promote fluffybum
can't quite work out who done him or why but the stream of alt accounts he's currently applying with is fairly entertaining
one of the new rubbish ones.
not you <3
or at least share a couple of accounts
they obviously aren't the same person
so I'm giving a tentative "yes" here
is that there are several volleys to hand here, but all of them just crushingly mean.
I will leave you to imagine the directions they could have taken.
Sent from my gold-plated life
It's a really good question. I mean, most relationships have two people of fairly equal attractiveness.
Sometimes age / pregnancy / drink / illness can change that a little, but mostly, people bag other people who are in "their league".
Unless they're minted or something.
just because he's wearing an appetite for destruction vest, doesn't mean he's ugly
with hand cream on your face?
women often go out with men much less attractive than them, whereas a man would almost always just go out with the most attractive woman he could get.
More revelations next week...
you hetro-normative, sexist bastard.
Also, the Deborah Meaden case blows that theory out the water.
It just seems that way as you fancy women (I assume) and so see them as the more attractive ones. Also because of BANTS about girls makes it seem like blokes are always wanting a total stunner, but truth is men, more than women, will settle as long as they're getting laid and such.
*smug, but still very ugly face*
go out with really butt ugly fellas to make me look better
One of us is considerably more attractive than the other. So I guess the answer to your question is 'yes'.
you're the political bore. i imagine this is what Sam Cam has to deal with.
melting your beloved's waxen face.
also has a crippling personality defect.
because it doesn't matter how attractive either half of the couple is perceived as being. It only matters how attractive they find each other.