Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
20 out of 20 y'all.
I got the airport from part 2 wrong! :(
Not happy. Not happy at all.
I've never seen any die hard films. So not bad. The carchphrase one is the only one I knew
no one gives a shit about die hard 4 tho.
If it was just a stand alone action film, 4 would get a lot more praise
Scored 13 though.
*beats self with kendo stick*
Not having seen Die Hard 4.0 cost me 3 of those
or the head of the terrorists in 2.
But given I've not seen 2 so I think I did ok
12. Who was the villain in Die Hard With a Vengeance?
17. What game did Simon Gruber want police to play in Die Hard With A Vengeance?
He could be running a team bonding away day, for example.
Definitely putting this on my CV.
A couple of you got the chauffeur wrong. I assume you've seen this. Should help you brush up on your Die Hard facts
Lucy not Katy is his daughter stupido...
This is going to require the purchase of some sort of box set and repeated viewing as pennance. Not seen 4 though :/
Between this and the Jurassic Park quiz they did a few weeks ago I've only had one incorrect answer glaben *pushes up glasses*
(Some were guesses). But I claim King Nerd anyway.
although i do hear that the 3rd one is pretty good.
Second one is pretty good, third one is very good.
Fourth is a huge disappointment. Haven't seen the fifth, but I understand it's significantly worse than the fourth.
absolutely ridiculously fantastic (in the sense of "unrealistic") but pretty entertaining nonetheless.
I wouldn't have a problem with it - but it's a total shitfest in the context of the Die Hard series.
John McClane entirely ceases to be John McClane and is just a humourless, indestructible superhero. There's no sense of jeopardy, the villain is entirely forgettable (especially when compared to either Gruber), and it all just feels like going through the motions as an exercise in raising money off the back of the series' previously good reputation.
But I guess if they'd made exactly the same film, only it WASN'T called Die Hard and he WASN'T called John McClane - I wouldn't be nearly as down on it
the fifth one was boring, but I really liked the 4th one. Much better than 2 anyway.
terrible, terrible writing.
though I've only seen 3 & 4 once each, and 2 only 2 or 3 times.
Seen the first at least a dozen or more times, but.
that's not true. I've seen the third at least 2 and probably 3 times. It's just the fourth that I've only seen the once.
is almost as good i would say. as with Die Hard the series tailed off in quality but the original is for all time.
by mistake because the DVD master was from a copy made for airlines!
is there a definitive version/ DVD/ blu ray? i must see this if it's as good as people say. it got very good reviews back in the day iirc.