Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
*not sure if going ahead or not
in the world's first industrial city
and open up a museum of Thatcher?
wow, the Stalinisation of England goes ahead at full speed
the worst thing to happen to the UK (or probably just England and Wales) in decades.
As there has to be a 'worst' thing
And Gove's remoulding of education could well be it
That bellend blocked me on twitter because I dared to suggest that posting this article a day after the woolwich murders wasn't in the best taste
...but, sure, it makes for a potentially interesting debate about where `tax efficiency` ends and where `immoral tax avoidance` begins.
Not that we'll have that debate here of course but, y'know...
it's not an extraordinary length to go to, just a form of donation that's taxed less, for whatever reason the taxlaws have for it. hardly off shore laundering or havening or whatver
if JML goes down the shitter tomorrow, the shares will lose value
its not THAT interesting really.
to the party you want to OUST ...
Taxes pay for services that the general public use, crudely put. Therefore, not giving taxes to a government who you oppose is extremely counter-intuitive.
If half of the donation went to them AS a donation you'd have a point...
I accept it is a silly point, just (pointlessly) musing out loud.
which contains this
It was reported that Ian Cameron took advantage of a change in the law made in 1979, which made it legal to take money out of the country without it being taxed or controlled by the UK government.
The end of capital controls was made by Margaret Thatcher after her first month in power.
let's talk about how much they went on about Labour's lack of liberal credentials and now we're looking at the Snooper's Charter, the latest in an impressive string of authoritarian bullshit.
As well as accepting the principles of tax efficiency and u-turning on the Winter Fuel Allowance, I see they now also now accept Tory policy that child benefit payments should not be universal. Good to see them making their first forays into the real world. It must be quite scary for them.
They said that it wouldn't be a priority to reinstate them universally when set against the many other things that they want to do if they get into government.
Bit harsh to kick them for being pragmatic when they've largely been kicked for the last couple of years for living in fairyland.
There is nothing which suggests they are agreeing with Tory policy and/or principle. To present it as such is a lie, and CG knows it.
Miliband's first ever PMQs as leader of the opposition was spent berating the Tories for scrapping of universal child benefit. He could have gone with anything he liked for his grand entrance, but he chose to go with opposing the Tory approach. It is now Labour party policy.
No spin needed from me. The facts speak for themselves.
don't see why you feel the need to incessantly differentiate between the Conservatives and Labour