Boards

they've only got themselves to blame.

It's just a torrent of anger

Amazing

It'd be that new Beyonce song

i think it was somehting she read on an email. She really is an angry lady.

Might call a Stevelet Yeah.

Listen closely, that's Alanis you can hear tittering.

From: Angry Lady
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:14
To: Person she is angry with
Subject:

Just thought I would get this off my mind,,,

Want to say thanks very much for your remarks on Toms emails about my inabilities to write reports so Jane had been asked to do them and that you would no longer be attending back office meals.

Not sure how you can comment on my work abilities when you have never worked with me.

Cheers for that Mate.

From: Person she is angry with
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:19
To: Angry Lady
Subject: RE:

I don’t remember commenting on your inability to write reports seeing as like you said I’ve never worked with you. The not attending back office meals anymore was a joke because without Tom I’ll be the only bloke who would go and would have no one to talk to (Phil doesn’t go).

Lastly, don’t read people’s PERSONAL emails without being prepared to hear things you might not like. Who reads people’s emails anyway?

From: Angry Lady
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:28
To: Person she is angry with
Subject: RE:

As a matter of fact the mailbox was provided to seek out specific emails that has been sent to (i have changed the company name).

And i think sarcasm is what is least disserved. And as a email is not marked personal it wasn’t a case of specifically hunting out your conversations not at all.

What I merely wanted to point out was it is nice to see what your opinion of me is. As at no point have i been critical of you in anyway shape or form of your abilities to undertake your role and feel that it is very inappropriate to make such comments about someone undertaking a new role.

Yeah I am prepared for what I see and don’t have an inability to accept remarks/ negative opinions from people, as I have undertaken most of my life having done so anyway.

So please do not cast aspersions about abilities and undertakings.

If you feel anything I am pointing out is inappropriate do feel free to take it up with a member of staff.

From: Person she is angry with
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:44
To: Angry Lady
Subject: RE:

Well that’s a lie, why would you be reading emails between me and Tom if it’s filtered to be about (i have changed the company name)? Tbh if you used common sense and saw how often I emailed Tom, with no subject titles, they clearly were personal emails. You just saw your name and had to keep going. Fair enough, I might keep going too if I saw I was mentioned, but I’d be prepared to accept what it says and not make a big deal of it, let alone mentioning it to the people involved. That just makes things ridiculously uncomfortable.

I doubt some people who you’re critical of have been critical about you, so don’t even start on that one. I haven’t criticised you about you undertaking your new role at all, because you’ve been doing it less than a month, and Tom told me how difficult it was to pick up at first. Some (or mostly) of the stuff you’re reading, you’ve probably read out of context.

I don’t know anything about your life so the ‘as i have undertaken most of my life’ sympathy card isn’t really going to work on me. I obviously can’t take back what I’ve said, albeit most of it was a joke, and the only thing I can really do now is apologise for offending you. So, I’m sorry. Contrary to what you may think, I’ve been getting on with you quite well (or so I thought) since you’ve moved back here.

So yeah, it’s up to you now how you want to act around me.

From: Angry lady
Sent: 15 march 2013 14:54
To: person she is angry with
Subject: RE:

Firstly don’t bother accusing me of telling lies, because a lier in life i am not.

Sympathy card no not that, not at all. Its called honesty as unfortunately some peoples lives aren’t a bed of roses but yeah you don’t no nothing about my life and i don’t expect you to. And just for future reference, sympathy would never be an expectation of yourself anyway as I really don’t no you and no jack Robinson about you.

Yes maybe I do want to no the truth about what certain people think of me because it just outlines what i was thinking anyway, that is all that has succeeded in doing.

Making things ridiculousely uncomfortable . No not really. That would all be down to how a situation is reacted to and how someone likes to move on from a situation. As dwelling can be rather boring to say the least.

Clearly their is a difference in the understanding between us of what a “ critisicm “ is but I have no intention of dwelling on that as I am getting bored already

And what you are referring in this line I have no clue,

“I doubt some people who you’re critical of have been critical about you, so don’t even start on that one”

But hey oh well a mere exercise of pointing out something has now turned into a complete debacle.

I don’t dwell on this things, just don’t like people being two faced don’t sit very well.

But as this has turned into a personal rant from your response..

May I wish you well . And I don’t dwell on things. So entirely up to you if you require to makes thing uncomfortable or not.

The gulf between the stupid and us is narrow, but very deep.

dissapointed

if c&bakey accidentally emailed this thread out to his entire office. imagine the scenes.

I would NEVER in a million years send such personal emails.

How did you get these emails? Are they to you? She sounds like a complete and utter fucking nutjob.

How are you getting these emails?

fair play.

has criticised her ability (or lack thereof) to write legible reports?

I think that's right. I couldn't quite tell from the appalling grammar and spelling.