Boards
Would you like to read an email
from an angry colleague to another from my workplace? It's good. She get's so angry it turns into nonsense. It's below here:
'From: Angry lady
Sent: 15 March 2013 15:16
To: Person she is angry with
Subject: RE:
Keep your stupid opinion to yourself. If you seriously want to piss me off keep calling me a liar. (BUT HEY AS STATED YOU HAVE NO DARN CLUE ABOUT ME ) so what give you the right to call someone a LIAR nothing what so ever.
SYMPATHY no that is a expectation of family in life when something is wrong. “ a childish “ pathetic email does not require sympathy “ death or illness “ require sympathy but hey maybe once again our understanding of the ENGLISH language differ.
You are utilising the plural “ PEOPLES EMAILS “ no my life aint that dull I would not require to go snooping . Just undertook reading the content of what was right before my eyes.
I have been working all day thank you and do not require telling from yourself as to when and how I should be going about my work.
As I am writing this off the cuff and being entirely honest and not trying to be the big women it don’t take 17 minutes for response to be constructed so no delay in my work has occurred.'
Yeah.
If they hire someone called Angry Lady
they've only got themselves to blame.
laughsnort
classic Angry Lady.
i want to know what prompted this
are you Person she is angry with?
Awful grammar.
tell her to choose to not be angry
what if Angry lady is angry because Person she is angry with says she's lying about having made a film?
question is far too hypothetical to answer
nobody would lie about having made a film
even if that were true, it doesn't preclude the possibility of being accused of it
eh?
exactly
:')
It doesn't even make sense
It's just a torrent of anger
Amazing
If this email was a song
It'd be that new Beyonce song
All The Angry Ladies
I more meant BOW DOWN BITCHES
that new fuck awful one
http://soundcloud.com/beyoncemusic/bow-down-i-been-on
I shall post the earlier ones too
i think it was somehting she read on an email. She really is an angry lady.
Yeah is a nice name.
Might call a Stevelet Yeah.
"maybe once again our understanding of the ENGLISH language differ."
Listen closely, that's Alanis you can hear tittering.
From: Angry Lady
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:14
To: Person she is angry with
Subject:
Just thought I would get this off my mind,,,
Want to say thanks very much for your remarks on Toms emails about my inabilities to write reports so Jane had been asked to do them and that you would no longer be attending back office meals.
Not sure how you can comment on my work abilities when you have never worked with me.
Cheers for that Mate.
"back office meals."
Back office meals? Is this a thing, or am I just an idiot? Both? Back office meals sounds... well... it sounds a bit smokey den of inequity basement poker
Maybe if Tom gave Angry Lady a back office meal then
she would not be angry much longer?
Now I feel like I'm missing out on something that happens
behind my back at the office (i don't work in an office but still)
Is it a euphemism
for sucking someone off in the toilet?
From: Person she is angry with
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:19
To: Angry Lady
Subject: RE:
I don’t remember commenting on your inability to write reports seeing as like you said I’ve never worked with you. The not attending back office meals anymore was a joke because without Tom I’ll be the only bloke who would go and would have no one to talk to (Phil doesn’t go).
Lastly, don’t read people’s PERSONAL emails without being prepared to hear things you might not like. Who reads people’s emails anyway?
From: Angry Lady
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:28
To: Person she is angry with
Subject: RE:
As a matter of fact the mailbox was provided to seek out specific emails that has been sent to (i have changed the company name).
And i think sarcasm is what is least disserved. And as a email is not marked personal it wasn’t a case of specifically hunting out your conversations not at all.
What I merely wanted to point out was it is nice to see what your opinion of me is. As at no point have i been critical of you in anyway shape or form of your abilities to undertake your role and feel that it is very inappropriate to make such comments about someone undertaking a new role.
Yeah I am prepared for what I see and don’t have an inability to accept remarks/ negative opinions from people, as I have undertaken most of my life having done so anyway.
So please do not cast aspersions about abilities and undertakings.
If you feel anything I am pointing out is inappropriate do feel free to take it up with a member of staff.
disserved
so the email which may or may not have said something negative about her
was sent from a generic mailbox? Pretty amateur mistake.
he should take it up with a random member of staff picked off the phone list
From: Person she is angry with
Sent: 15 March 2013 14:44
To: Angry Lady
Subject: RE:
Well that’s a lie, why would you be reading emails between me and Tom if it’s filtered to be about (i have changed the company name)? Tbh if you used common sense and saw how often I emailed Tom, with no subject titles, they clearly were personal emails. You just saw your name and had to keep going. Fair enough, I might keep going too if I saw I was mentioned, but I’d be prepared to accept what it says and not make a big deal of it, let alone mentioning it to the people involved. That just makes things ridiculously uncomfortable.
I doubt some people who you’re critical of have been critical about you, so don’t even start on that one. I haven’t criticised you about you undertaking your new role at all, because you’ve been doing it less than a month, and Tom told me how difficult it was to pick up at first. Some (or mostly) of the stuff you’re reading, you’ve probably read out of context.
I don’t know anything about your life so the ‘as i have undertaken most of my life’ sympathy card isn’t really going to work on me. I obviously can’t take back what I’ve said, albeit most of it was a joke, and the only thing I can really do now is apologise for offending you. So, I’m sorry. Contrary to what you may think, I’ve been getting on with you quite well (or so I thought) since you’ve moved back here.
So yeah, it’s up to you now how you want to act around me.
Oh no, she's done you there Angers
This is the last one
From: Angry lady
Sent: 15 march 2013 14:54
To: person she is angry with
Subject: RE:
Firstly don’t bother accusing me of telling lies, because a lier in life i am not.
Sympathy card no not that, not at all. Its called honesty as unfortunately some peoples lives aren’t a bed of roses but yeah you don’t no nothing about my life and i don’t expect you to. And just for future reference, sympathy would never be an expectation of yourself anyway as I really don’t no you and no jack Robinson about you.
Yes maybe I do want to no the truth about what certain people think of me because it just outlines what i was thinking anyway, that is all that has succeeded in doing.
Making things ridiculousely uncomfortable . No not really. That would all be down to how a situation is reacted to and how someone likes to move on from a situation. As dwelling can be rather boring to say the least.
Clearly their is a difference in the understanding between us of what a “ critisicm “ is but I have no intention of dwelling on that as I am getting bored already
And what you are referring in this line I have no clue,
“I doubt some people who you’re critical of have been critical about you, so don’t even start on that one”
But hey oh well a mere exercise of pointing out something has now turned into a complete debacle.
I don’t dwell on this things, just don’t like people being two faced don’t sit very well.
But as this has turned into a personal rant from your response..
May I wish you well . And I don’t dwell on things. So entirely up to you if you require to makes thing uncomfortable or not.
She doesn't like to dwell on things
Sympathy card no not that, not at all.
Jack Robinson
eh?
you've gone and blown her cover with that one
Yoda be MAD.
you no it
Jack Robinson be mad
I, a lier in life?
TotM
These are the same types of people that crop up in our facebook pisstake threads, aren't they?
The gulf between the stupid and us is narrow, but very deep.
it seems like all of that would pretty much make sense if I knew the people involved or read whatever it was in reply too
dissapointed
can you just imagine how incredible a turn this thread would take
if c&bakey accidentally emailed this thread out to his entire office. imagine the scenes.
Even if I had a problem with a member of staff
I would NEVER in a million years send such personal emails.
How did you get these emails? Are they to you? She sounds like a complete and utter fucking nutjob.
btw really want a back office
meal
Whatever happened with your bully of a boss?
Did that get resolved?
I quit my job when offered a better one
Ironically, she was gutted when I left.
How are you getting these emails?
Probably the same way Angry Lady got Person She's Angry With's emails
Yeah
link her to the thread!
i don't really understand
sounds like someone's been slagging her off behind her back, she by chance read them slagging her off, doesn't take shit
fair play.
I wonder how regularly I get slagged off in work emails
It's probably a lot
So her main bone of contention is that she thinks it's unfair that this guy
has criticised her ability (or lack thereof) to write legible reports?
I think that's right. I couldn't quite tell from the appalling grammar and spelling.