Which books published in your lifetime will be thought of as classic fiction in a 100 years time?
I'm a 36 year old and tend not to read that many "new" books. Despite starting this thread I'm not sure that there have been that many new great works of fiction. Please enlightened me into which books I should read.
Thread not appearing correctly? Click here to rebuild | Report this

phillip pullmans - his dark materials
American Psycho :')
Is this tongue in cheek?
nah
something something post-Reagan moral vacuum
American Psycho is one of the greatest books ever written
and will be remembered long after we are all dead
This. Get's a bad rap because it's author is enormous tit.
But genuinely one of the greatest books ever written.
I've read American Psycho. Maybe those "sarcastic" chapters that
endlessly referenced stuff like Huey Lewis and all things 80s might be oddly of interest to some people in the future. Would people read any Douglas Coupland a century from now?
I'm not even sure Douglas Coupland books would make sense to anyone post-Generation X today, let alone 100 years in the future.
Shame. I've been "occupational slumming" as Coupland
put it since I graduated in 1997.
I read it a couple of years ago, it feels very much like a period piece.
harry potter 1-7
Infinite Jest - David Foster Wallace
possibly House of Leaves by Mark Danielewski but in the same way that The Big Sleep is a classic now. Like intellectualised pulp fiction.
Came here to post Infinite Jest.
The Pale King also.
not The Pale King
but The Broom of the System is brilliant.
Why not The Pale King?
It's incredible.
but... he never finished it himself
just feels wrong.
Someone called incandenza likes DFW?
I am surprised ;)
I honestly think Pale King could have been better than Infinite Jest, if he'd finished it.
well, yes :)
hmm...nah, not possible to better IJ. it would have come close, of that I'm sure. just hard to imagine that he would ever have been in the right state of mind to wrangle his thoughts and finish the thing.
I think I prefer it to Infinite Jest in some ways.
Damned if I can tell you which ways though...it just seems so odd and atmospheric and sad.
All the Pretty Horses
in fact most of Cormac McCarthy's stuff
*Blood Meridian
Arundhati Roy's God of Small Things
although i wasn't a massive fan
I quite liked it but it took awhile to get going
2666- Roberto Bolano
Kavalier and Clay- Michael Chabon
His Dark Materials- Philip Pullman
yeah def 2666
Kavalier and Clay vote from me
The Unbearable Lightness of Being?
maybe Watchmen as a classic of the genre (are comics a genre?)
maybe The Secret History - that's pretty timeless, I reckon
I'd say so (re: The Unbearable Lightness...)
although my friend regards it as sophistry.
he's missing the point, though: it isn't an important work of philosophy as much as it's a bleak cold war romance that uses the model of the philosophical novel as a vehicle for something less concerned with its own iron grip on the truth, more concerned with a heady, deconstructive yet transcendental take on relationships and the flaws in human nature.
comics are a medium
that's the word I was looking for
watchmen's already regarded as a classic
e.g. it's on the TIME 100 greates books since 1923 list
Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenedies
If Hilary Mantel completes that trilogy
then that.
The Gruffalo
I second 2666
Freedom - Jonathan Franzen
i third 2666
am I the only person who think The Savage Detectives is better than 2666
???
haha
don't worry, I've seen The Savage Detectives rated higher in polls and stuff before, so its not just you!
I really enjoyed The Savage Detectives, but much preferred 2666 and would go as far as to say it's my favourite ever book. So far that is..
Tbh Savage Detectives and 2666 can almost be treated as one body of work.
They clearly take place in the same literary universe, sharing characters and themes and atmosphere.
But yeah I'll also back up the 2666 nomination, it's basically already been inducted into the canon by critics but of course we'll see in 50, 75, 100 years' time. Some of the writers who won the Nobel back in the first half of the 20th century were similarly received back then but are hardly remembered now.
not read savage detetives yet
I can't imagine it'll be as good though
few things are
Slaughter 5 by Vonnegutt
already a classic
I cheated
Ian McEwan is the greatest living writer
But you can't but love anything by Peter Carey, Alan Hollinghurst, Cormac McCarthy and JM Coetze.
Patchy but essential reading of writers who rule the roost right now include Martin Amis, Will Self, AS Byatt, Margaret Atwood and Julian Barnes. The titans.
(Try London Fields, My Idea of Fun, Posession, The Blind Assasin, Flaubert's Parrot respectively)
Read a book recommendation: Steve Toltz - A Fraction of a Whole.
Classic in 100 years time: Bel Canto by Ann Patchett.
Gabriel Garcia Marquez is still alive.
*Thomas Pynchon
speaking of which, Against The Day is surely a minor classic, and Mason & Dixon, which I'm sadly yet to read, possibly a major one
Yeah Pynchon is clearly the greatest living novelist
As is Philip Roth.
Philip Roth isn't going to sleep with you, you know?
He might.
I would put good money on Carey, Hollinghurst, Amis , Atwood and Barnes Not being in this category ...
Coetzee and McCarthy, and possibly Byatt, but the others are middle brow booker long list stuff ... Not knocking it, like a lot of those authors, but they are not TITANS (as you call them)
Money by Martin Amis
The Corrections
I'd like to think that What A Carve Up! would be, but probably not.
Perfume?
The Corrections / Franzen's work in general is / are on my to-read list
* scratch the are
Paul Auster - The New York Trilogy
Bellow, Marquez, Miloszc,Borges, Hill (geoffrey), Heaney, Hughes, Gordimer, Paz,
Saramago, Grass, Auster, Coetzee, Carver, Foster Wallace, Pinter, Vargos LLosa, perhaps McCarthy, Bolano and Franzen ... those sorts ... Not your Amis, Self, Barnes', good as they are.
Plus, lots of stuff that isn't on our radar as important but will be seen to be so in time.
*perhaps* McCarthy?
I think it will depend on him writing one more defining novel ...
The Road is amazing but slight, the border trilogy is seen by many i think as being too derivative of Faulkner.
Still, He would be my choice for the Nobel Prize.
Suttree? The Orchard Keeper? Blood Meridian?
take your pick. already classic. one of the all-time greats.
Don DeLillo - Underworld
White Noise
WG Sebald - The Rings of Saturn
bit of an obvious choice but
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.
Nah, people will have forgotten all the Scandi crime novels
I'd put money on Murakami being remembered very well - maybe Norwegian Wood, or The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle?
Oh, and Philip Roth, obvs
see for people outside of Scandinavia I suspect they just come across as great crime novels
but they also touch on elements of Swedish politics and culture which might see people revisiting them again in the future. Pure speculation of course.
Good call on Murakami though.
In fairness I've only read the first 'Dragon Tattoo' book
It just didn't grab me any more than your usual WH Smith airport lounge thriller, but it does seem to have become quite a phenomenon. Anyone care to recommend either of the films?
I've only seen the original swedish of The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
highly recommended though
Richard Yates
Who is so fucking underrated it hurts.
Willy Vlautin - Lean on Pete / The Motel Life
Shalom Auslander - Beware of God
Chuck Palahniuk - Choke
Bret Easton Ellis - American Psycho
Irvine Welsh - Crime / Filth / The bedroom secrets of the master chefs
Tom Perrotta - Election
James Palumbo - Tomas
Ronan O'Brien - Confessions of a fallen angel
Billy Childish - My fault
James Frey - A million little pieces
Daniel Wallace - Mr Sebastian and the negro magician
Lydia Millett - How the dead dream
Charlie Higson - Happy Now
Lars Husum - My friend Jesus Christ
Philip Roth - The Humbling / Indignation
Veronique Ovalde - And my see-through heart
Alex Garland - The coma
1984
C'mon creaky - you ain't that old
American Pastoral - Philip Roth
None that I can think of
oh wait what about...
nah not that.
http://www.cementimental.com/noisebook/index.html
I always assumed Cormac McCarthy was a woman
no idea why. ACTUALLY - I KNOW. It is because I got them confused with Carson McCullers.
I have no idea, it can be quite random who and which books become classics 40 years down the line, it can be ones which didn't get much praise at the time, but then it was probably quite obvious that Steinbeck and Hemingway would be seen as classics from the moment they were printed I guess.
Cormac McCarthy WISHES he was Carson McCullers
I'd say Gilead by Marilynne Robinson is my favourite 21st century book
So that, hopefully
Not nearly enough cyber fiction in this thread
in 100 years time this will be seen as the age of the digital pioneers - a shift into virtual existence as relevant as modernism's shift from agrarian to urban existence
a lot of what people have suggested in this thread is simply an extension of archetypal modernism
Interested in your comment about modernism, strikes me as almost totally untrue.
If by that you mean the last little half-formed sentence
DiS posted it while I was trying to delete it. I'm on a bus on my phone
ah!
home now
but I can't remember what my point was going to be
meh
The Wasp Factory
Berserk
people are just saying books they like
it's almost as if whether or not a book is good or not is just down to an individual's opinion
Riders by jilly cooper
when did margaret atwood release that book?
which one?