Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
(Mildly NSFW if you're sensitive, though the pics are blurred).
So which one of the MME is this?
(moousee is the real babe magnet)
Providing it's in a secluded area, like.
No idea what that is. Could probably name two red light areas in Manchester - Fairfield Street and Cheetham Hill. Could be either, i guess.
`am intimately familiar with`
Historically, Tib Street used to be the most notorious place for hookers, but then they started plonking loads of beardy bars and apartments around there.
they have taken that section out of the map. you can't go on part of the street. haven't got round to replacing i guess
no it doesnt.
Unless it does and I've been using it wrong all these years...
Perhaps even better, the image inspired the proprietor of Google Maps Mania to make a map featuring a number of NSFW place names around the world, including:
i wanna be on the site
Although I'm not doing anything quite so interesting
It managed to catch me mid-stride and I look a bit like a limp puppet.
Oh they've updated it, I'm not there any more. However my dad is on there in his car, in pretty much the same place I was caught.
also, how do you find yourself on there?
I remember seeing the car drive past...
So when they updated it all and whatnot, I had a nose.
always look like screen captures from The Sims
what a brilliant shit hole
I'll give you a tug in a public place if you want?
I've been pulling mine a few times a week since I was like 11
One of DOTS or Vine will be along shortly to this the post then back me up.
I was walking up there once to go to a girls in ancoats and got propositioned by 4 different prostitutes. Said "sorry i'm actually off up here to nail a girl for free" to all of them.
is when a guy tried to walk into the star and garter with a prostitute, and offered the bouncers 50 quid to let him 'have a go' in the toilets. They said no and so he said that he'd buy a pint as well. Then he went and banged her around the back in the carpark with the CCTV showing it in the pub.
If not that's just a waste of £50
Sometimes i like to rub my thigh with my other hand in a sort of Vic Reeves motion when pulling the auld pud. i've never tried to rub both thighs when one of your mums is doing it for me, but i imagine it'd be quite fun, if a bit offputting for her, but hey, there'd be a 15-stone, probably topless man gurning at her anyway, so she'd probably have bigger worries.
If my missus showed that much disinterest while wanking me off in the street i'd be fuming. You're not paying for interest off ho's
I was just pre empting his white knighting. All women aren't whores
This is going to run and run.
alright germaine greer
now back to the kitchen
LOL BANTZ. GOOD WORK MANCHESTER!!!!!
Good work for allowing the continued purchase and oppression of women? Yeah, good work.
You're not turning this into one of your serious threads.
Get back on the blower to tiramisu and tell her it was a false alarm.
when it's not in the slightest. People know that prostitution is happening - it's just that they think this woman has no shame and managed to accidentally get caught on camera.
When people are saying things like "stay classy MCR ahaha" I doubt they're directing it at the council to be honest; it's pretty obviously about it's inhabitants and THESE TWO PEOPLE or THIS WOMAN. This woman hasn't done anything wrong.
whether money has exchanged hands or not.
For spying on people.
tossing someone off in the street...
But there's nowt wrong with it apparently
a place where taxis drive up and down 24hrs a day to go to the train station.
where men know to go to buy sex.
let's not discriminate.
Surely, if we are being neutral about it
but not concealing it either...
sometimes you must just like the sound of your fingers on the keyboard..
and carries a 2yr prison sentence. So yes, I would say it is wrong.
but not deliberate exposure. YOU PEOPLE.
Surely morality is a very individual thing. There are obviously things that as a society we all tend to deem immoral (like killing) but beyond that I'm not sure we can say this is or isn't morally wrong. I'll agree with you that people probably *shouldn't* think it morally wrong but that's a different sort of argument.
I would say they both have in the eyes of the law.
do you not get the distinction betwen the law and things that aren't the law?
Neither of these people have, as far as I'm aware, been convicted of or even charged with that offence.
We draw up rules (criminal offences, like indecent exposure) which mean there is a certain amount of situtations where someone could be said to have fallen foul of the rules. That does not mean that in every case (when someone does break a law) that their behaviour is of the same nature as that which offence was originally intended to criminalise or call 'wrong'.
The law and its judicial interpretation also acknowledge that you can break a law without doing anything 'wrong' or 'dishonest' or 'reprehensible' or 'unconscionable' or other norms of wrongdoing.
So basically the same thing I just said again.
I can't imagine them being interested enough to try and charge the two with an offence, even if there might be grounds to.
what definition are we using as 'doing something wrong' then?
i'd say indecent exposure is both, whatever the definition is anyway.
if you think it's morally wrong
personally, if something's illegal, i'd consider it doing something wrong. so far as i know, both prostitution and lewd public acts are against the law, and as such, in my opinion, wrong.
let's get this thread back on track, though, it's Friday afternoon, ffs.
apart from prostitution isn't against the law.
Fucking double standards
prostitution isn't if it's carried out in a private residence but soliciting people on the street is.
glad to help.
Law degree coming in useful today!
and therefore wrong.
bottom line, hooker or not, she shouldn't be pulling a guy off in clear daylight in the middle of the street. it's not solely her at fauly, obviously, it's as much his, but they've both commited a couple of relatively serious crimes.
Which is why we were all here in the first place.
Before someone had to lower the tone and make it all serious and tedious.
Subjecting people to the possibility of involuntarily seeing a sex act while maybe not the worst thing someone can do is still a bad thing.
who probably doesn't have the option of going home home or being 'in private' with this guy. She might prefer to but the likelihood is she wouldn't be offering sex for money in Manchester city centre if she was in full control of the situation, right?
that's a bit "but we're poor"/London riots for me.
words fail me.
If you were asked, like.
Can only so that there's one person with his junk out, one person is stimulating that junk and it's in a relatively open space in the middle of town.
That for me isn't a good thing regardless of the circumstances that have led to these two people being in this particularly grim exchange.
Personally it's something I have a lot of so would find being caught in this situation, or in fact just being in this situation, pretty shameful either way I'd rather people weren't subjected to the possibility of seeing it.
Might be being a bit won't someone think of the children but whatever.
someone in a particular circumstance not being in the wrong for transgressing that rule, and the fact of the rule being 'unjust'.
argument to convince me that this falls into one of those situations.
it's making the point that there's no onus on me to convince you of anything.
Seemed a bit like you were insinuating I was being an arrogant prick for disagreeing with you.
I would file it in the category of 'having done something wrong'
fair enough, that's a valid stance to take.
it wouldn't be anyone's prerogative to shame me for it.
I just popped out to get a sandwhich at lunch, felt a bit horny so had a cheeky tug on the way back from tescos. Got a couple of shocked looks from passersby but who are they to judge.
that section doesn't go blue
it's blue enough already
"how the fuck did this get to 111 threads?"
hahahahaha look everyone!
Wank Wank Wank!
i've just had a message on facebook from someone who DOESN'T post on DiS asking why someone in this thread has been banned. wtf
Good laugh and that. Great bants.
*please don't ban me*
i can't remember
I really hated that guy
and, to a lesser extent, the same character in Police Academy 6: City Under Siege.
Under that criteria I can only assume mods cant ban themselves.
Kind of odd.
to see if i could find out. really though, i don't have any interest in WHY, i just thought that was weird. i just told him "there was a feminism thread, there's always some blood shed"
but yeah, we're in that ballpark
IS IT THAT TIME OF THE MONTH?
usually without even realising theyre doing it.
just like really weird. That's all really got nothing to say about the rest of this thread.
You've become absolutely insufferable. Pretty much the definition of a snivelling dickhead philosophy student. Sort it out for christ sake.
i pretty much said that in the most inoffensive way possible.
is morally questionable legal or not.
cos i can't be bothered to argue about that.
which are related to the thread but not about the thread itself. Insufferable.
it's ok though, i don't really care that much. hence why i didnt really make a big deal of it.
Not really sure that's how the theories of laughter or super sciencey neurology stuff works, but it could just be that I'm an absolute monster. Probably am, tbf. I've gone a bit Mehodor's own-brand of evolutionary psychology in a FEMINISM! thread.
every thread could become about politics or maths
jesus danielkelly you don't even know how to READ
I just thought we could talk about the things we find weird together, while everyone else argued amongst themselves. Fuck you though.
(Work's finished now so I'm going home. Don't worry, I'm not really mad at you)
that's ok, we're cool.
Stay classy MCR!!
stop promoting sexism/human trafficking/prostitution!
Just out of curiosity
No, I can't hold this in any longer.
FIVE QUID, SAME AS IN TOWN!!!!
How many drugs, if any, she is on and so forth
this is bullshit
and on the gawker page too
i think darwindude was the 2nd person, after shrewbie. everyone else was having a right laugh.
you win the georgiabeth sponsored by the darwindude school of womyn's studies award for most improved dis cis male
but if it had been at night rather than in the day, i might have done
When I look in my closet, I don't see male clothes or female clothes. They're all the same.
all my male friends grabbed my balls. true story
I felt more than a little naughty
Assumed they were both gypos tbh
It could very well be a cross dresser.
Is think you meant "ze" not "it" you monster.
it's a yorkshire terrier goes by the name of Mr Smeester. Meths is beside himself with worry.
this shit writes itself.