Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
as they show paparazzi shots of an eight year old girl in gym shorts and caption her as a "leggy beauty"
I can't quite see it, but the public mood is at such a point that maybe people will be genuinely pissed off with their endless hypocrisy.
I defend the British media so much but the DM is actually grotesque.
None of the papers want to draw attention to sins of their own industry lest the splashback hit them. The BBC can't really do it. So who does? Blogs and forums. Is that going to sway public opinion to boycott advertising and so on?
It's another word only used in newspapers (apparently in ever more disturbing ways).
and just repeats things from newspapers.
when in the company of true geezers & lads. And, as everyone knows, geezers & lads only really appreciate tits. Even liking arses too much is a bit suspect with geezers & lads. Fuck admiring legs - that's for poofs. Hence no one ever says "I like that leggy blonde."
this sort of thing wouldn't be printed if the Mail weren't responding to the insatiable appetites of the public for... yeah no.
FUCKING SICK PAEDO SCUM
The phone hacking stuff was reprehensible but you understood the motivation behind it when they were pushing to get exclusives at any costs.
This kind of thing is just bizarre and hypocritical given Savile-gate, especially when they once famously vowed not to use papparzzi shots, and are actually banned by the PCC from printing pics of under-16s without permission from their parents/teachers (hence they blank out pics of UK celeb's kids).
They've probably already deleted this, but will there ever be an admission of guilt on it? Doubtful.
But the Mail is seriously dark sometimes, the amount of hateful bile and psychologically manipulative stuff they produce is upsetting ... I hate reading it, hate that I do, and hate (but understand) anyone else reading it either.
oh whatever, you are right :(