Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
... we've always known the Queen's had the power to veto legislation.
Basically the royal family are meddling cunts, supported by us, who do nothing for anyone and worst of all, we've got to (literally and metaphorically) bow down to them. The inbreds.
Fucking get rid of them. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a prize tit.
I'm not sure the reason that it isn't used more often is a reason why they should have such powers in the first place.
between legislation generated by the executive and by the legislative.
and that in that case, it was the executive using their undemocratic powers in asking the queen to veto the bill.
But I'd refine the presentation of the argument a little.
Although there is a school of thought that the style of presentation of an argument had no relevancy, so...
The more the Royal Family does to seem anachronistic and incompatible with the 21st century, the better.
I don't think your plan is working...
2013: A NEW BABY!
2014: HARRY GETS MARRIED PROBABLY!
Let's bring back the death penalty and castrate paedos too yeah? Also, instant prison sentences for drug abuse. And more X Factor. And Eastenders. And let's lock Colin Stagg, Robert Murat and Chris Jefferies up too. Come on, they've got to be guilty, the press said so.
give 'em enough rope...
but they'll use it.