I’m confused how you can convert 24fps to 48fps without simply doubling every frame? Surely if it’s filmed in 48fps then that’s 48 different frames rather than 24 different frames doubled up?
I mean the more mechanical feel was what I was after, I think if you're making summat with puppets everyone knows you're making it with puppets, so why not make it look like it's been made with puppets?
That's why I'm not keen on a lot of super high budget modern stop motion eg Tim Burton related stuff, it might as well be CGI if it gets TOO smooth... On the other hand a curse on Wes Anderson for frame reducing great animation after the fact because it looked too 'good' >_<
like when people try and pretend FLAC or MP4 files sound better than MP3s, etc, but i watched a clip in 48fps, and it was truly dreadful. Looked like a cheap telly soap, and i genuinely felt a bit dizzy watching it.
If that's really what it does, i doubt i'd make it through a film without walking out, or even vomiting.
48faps > 24faps
Fucking hell, that looks horrendous.
Like a cheap TV show.
I think my computer's not displaying it properly.
Everything looks fucked. Like the sound's at the right rate but the movement seems too fast, like a Charlie Chaplin film.
that's just your perception
apparently if you watch more than 10 minutes of it your brain adjusts
it looks like a cheap hdtv
doesnt it, like just not quite right
It's simple maths.
48fps > 24fps
true if the criteria is 'the cinema industry continuing to make vast sums of money'
are you under the impression
that people get paid by the frame?
I'm not cat_race
makes sense to be paid by the frame though
yeah
buthten etha ll the films are too long
not if you use part time actors
Haha wait he just post-converted the normal trailer as an exercise, it won't actually look quite like this (still will look weird/bad I'm sure tho)
http://www.lukeletellier.com/?portfolio=post-converting-the-hobbit-trailer-to-48fps
Yeah I questioned that in a comment, although it tells me it's awaiting moderation
so maybe you can't see it.
He has a blog post with more info on how he did it that you could ever want unless you were also a postproduction artist/nerd:
http://www.lukeletellier.com/?p=205
?
I’m confused how you can convert 24fps to 48fps without simply doubling every frame? Surely if it’s filmed in 48fps then that’s 48 different frames rather than 24 different frames doubled up?
Wayhey!
It's there.
you times it by two instead of doubling
Apparently people are leaving the cinema feeling nauseous
T
yes please
But what do they think about the 48fps issue?
Milk and two, please.
PEOPLE LEAVE CINEMAS FEELING NAUSEOUS AT ANY FILM THAT ISN"T SHOT LIKE AN EPISODE OF NEIGHBORS
it's going to fail at the boxoffice
jackson should have locked off his tripods and only used static shots
When i was at uni
i used to prefer to make my films 12fps for the jerky Harryhausen look. SHOWS WHAT YOU KNOW
Harryhausen is not really jerky and filmed at 24fps, albiet without motion blur so it looks stopmotiony
18 FPS SUPER-8 FOR LYFE
I didn't know that
I mean the more mechanical feel was what I was after, I think if you're making summat with puppets everyone knows you're making it with puppets, so why not make it look like it's been made with puppets?
indeed!
That's why I'm not keen on a lot of super high budget modern stop motion eg Tim Burton related stuff, it might as well be CGI if it gets TOO smooth... On the other hand a curse on Wes Anderson for frame reducing great animation after the fact because it looked too 'good' >_<
I know what you mean
although i like the way in films like Wallace and Gromit they modelled fingerprints onto the CGI characters so that they looked like plasticene :)
I tried to animate stop motion on twos once but
i discovered when I played it back i'd subconsciously done it at 25fps anyway -__-
Probably could have sorted it out in post?
I did, we had to speed it up x 2 :)
can't wait to see what those blurry slow motion shots
he put in LOTR every 2 minutes look like in 48fps
Got tickets booked for tomorrow night, 48fps AND 3D.
If I'm not throwing up popcorn and cursing the name of Jackson by the time I leave, I shall be very disappointed.
Is it only in HFR in 3D?
Believe so. I think that was the point of doing it like that, to make the 3D look better.
25fps>>>>>
such a xenophobe
luddite
just disintegrates into pink squares for me
omeone described The Hobbit as Jackson's Phantom Menace
I hope it'snto true but apparently they've got the book, threw it in the bin and made this a cinematic LOTR prequel.
My colleague saw it and said it's the first third of the book in full.
So away with your Daily Mail hyperbole.
It wasn't Daily Mail who said that clearly
It was some film person. I can't remember though.
If it was the Daily Mail, it would be "immigrant workers steal actiing job and guess who picks up the bill" or something.
I;m sure they could get some hitler-related tolkien headline going
http://io9.com/5892697/whats-classier-than-jrr-tolkien-telling-off-nazis-absolutely-nothing
OUR FILM WILL BE AT A NORMAL FRAMERATE AND CONTAIN STOP MOTION FX
please support instead of The Hobbit: http://drownedinsound.com/community/boards/social/4421426
(JAG)
videogames have been running over 24fps for ages
no idea why cinema can't keep up.
Yeah, 120 frames per second, you cavemen
most of my pc games run at about 2 fps
haha
Was going to just say this is a load of shite for nobheads...
like when people try and pretend FLAC or MP4 files sound better than MP3s, etc, but i watched a clip in 48fps, and it was truly dreadful. Looked like a cheap telly soap, and i genuinely felt a bit dizzy watching it.
If that's really what it does, i doubt i'd make it through a film without walking out, or even vomiting.
wont be seein
lotr is appalling
haha untrue agreed with you