Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
then some are god awful. that cobain one especially.
the kurt cobain and the luigi throwing a fireball ones are incredible
It's kind of an insult.
That said, all the childhood references through out are great. The art itself, I'm not so sold on.
some of that's alright.
not in a 'hang it above your fire' sort of way, like, but he could certainly earn money illustrating.
it's not pretentious, which automatically makes it more interesting than about 90% of other 'art'.
but maybe the opposite - if it were music it'd be Kreayshawn. there's too much irony, pop culture reference and overall shittyness. I'm guessing these won't be selling for cheap/reasonable price either.
this is great
(my favourite, not one of MY paintings, etc)
have you seen that book he wrote?
I skim-read it in the library, it was pretty funny and weird. I like the lad.
He has shed loads of money and was boffing Mila Kunis for eight years.
Don't think any of us can get all superior over this given the above.
He's been taking drugs for about 15 years, and he was a kid when he earned his kippers, so agents and his folks probably spent most of it for him.
What was his last big role? Richie Rich?
£1m a year on, well, stuff, wouldn't be out of the ordinary for a celebrity, i don't think.
Some deeply philistine assumptions in "thinks he's an artist"
would you be accused of being a philistine for linking to macaulay culkin's artwork and not taking it deadly serious
lighten up ya plum
then he is an artist.
& if they are being exhibited then he is a successful one
might be a genius
and i've seen some art
I wouldn't buy it.
Fair play, if I was him I would probably be doing exactly the same kind of mental shit