Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
Though rather annoying that the trailer basically ruins what I assume is the first third of the film.
tell the story in a retrospective way with the central character having a series of extended flashbacks to complement the story, but apparently not.
Tbf though pretty much all trailers do. At least there's no awful wubby dubstep in this one.
I'm definitely going to see it but I've no expectations that it will be anything but a ham-fisted 28 Days Later rip off now.
which used the brand and some of the ideas from the book. I'm surprised you hoped otherwise.
It's basically a different film to the one they started production on.
that once this sort of book gets sucked into *the machine* it is only going in one direction - generic - no matter how good the first few treatments are. You just can't get the budget required to make the sort of film you and I would probably want to see.
Still looks better than I expected though.
It was unlikely to remain completely bedwetter friendly once it became Hollywood property and I've not had hopes it would turn out as anything other than a mindless action flick for years now. But the novel was a cut above most zombie fiction and I had initially thought the film would be too, even after 20 different producers had pawed all over it.
because there's never been a decent zombie movie made on a relatively low budget ever.
I like this one
even tho that's clearly not a good idea and also pointless since it looks like the trailer gave away everything that happens in it.
enough is enough
is all Glasgow standing in for Philadelphia, saw some of the filming, it was amazing.
like its trying to be Resi Evil 5
The shots of George Square and Strathclyde Uni are hilarious
If it was Glasgow being Glasgow, it'd be fine.
least scary thing ever
It was fucking hard going, but I'm looking forward to seeing the film though.
- The title
looks like utter dog shit. About as original as PG tips
Except 2012 was fun and stupid and had John Cusack in it. This just looks stupid and has unnecessarily used the title of a great book.
Very interesting format. When I heard it was going to be a film, I did wonder how they would film it using the same format. Obviously it was too difficult
I loved the book. This isn't the book.
Plus, would someone just get rid of that lisping child.
How come Brad Pitt looks so young?