Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
JUDGE FOR YOURSELF
Makes a change to see a nutjob conspiracy theory that isn't directed at Obama though, I guess.
deliberately talking utter unadulterated drivel in order to purposefully confuse Obama. For Obama, it was like trying to work out what a two-year-old actually meant.
surely everyone understands that the candidates are prepped by a committee of advisors until their answers/viewpoints etc are finely honed.
they all have speech writers and that anyway, same difference.
not just cycle through prepared answers
whether the notes are in front of them or have been memorized.
I don't see what the difference is. There's no way either one would have been asked a question that they hadn't already rehearsed an answer to. and even if they were, it wouldn't be in their notes anyway.
Mitt won fair and square. Not unusual for an incumbant to lose Rd 1. This guy beat Hillary, so I'm sure it'll be a different story come Rd 2.