Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
Blair > Major > Brown > Cameron > Thatcher
Give reasons if you must, but you don't have to.
I'm not sure where to put Cameron; rakings need the benefit of hindsight. Definitely before Brown, though.
change this year.
possibly with thatcher and cameron swapped, just because there must have been SOMETHING about her that people liked so much?
ability as a PM? hotness? haircuts? number of kills?
5. puny human number two
4. puny human number four
3. puny human number three
2. puny human number one
1. Margaret Thatcher
rank: height (guestimate)
rank: messiah complex
number of letters in their name (largest to smallest) followed by reverse alphabetical
Even in music forum threads, he tries to skirt the rules.
AND IT DOES HIM NO GOOD
rank : number of Fall albums on their Ipods.
everyone >>>>>> Thatch
rank: who would you fuck.
I was going to say that you are strange, for putting thatcher in the middle......I thought she only generated extremes of opinion (due to her extremeness)
so it seems that you like 'moderate pms' in good time but hate them in the bad times, and you stick the extreme ones in the middle
I think Blair was quite good, but y'know, Iraq and all. and he's completely lost the plot since he left office. Thatcher was imo a really negative impact on Britain but at least she had a system of beliefs steering her actions unlike Cameron's clusterfuck.
Brown had to make a big decision and people didn't like it and misinterpret it, but it needed to be done. A bit like Batman
Haters gonna hate.
to find out how old everyone is.
Technically I was alive for 2 and a half months while Thatcher was still in power but I'm not ranking her. THATCHER BABY
Major is getting some love here. He seemed to have done the least harm overall, possibly due to a short term in office. He is the default no.1: the least worst.
Cameron's austerity plan is just an awful idea, and the financial outlook keeps getting worse. He is buggering it all up for ideological reasons, it seems - he can't back out otherwise he'll look a twat. Horrible combination of arrogance and cluelessness.
Jeremy Hunt is still in the cabinet? In charge of the bloody NHS? Jesus!
Thatcher did a lot of the same Tory stuff, but at least she didn't have the 'Big Society' and general smarm factor. Anti-union, should have invested North Sea oil money in infrastructure, had no idea about recessions. Was the last of her breed, really.
Brown wasn't great, but at least there was someone who knew how numbers worked in office (how much of the crisis is actually his fault remains to be seen). Had no chance of election following Blair, though.
So Blair is no.4. Iraq, tuition fees, being a smarmy toad and Bush's poodle and all that. Thatcher wasn't great, but at least she bolstered Britain's image abroad with her war - Blair ruined it with his. Wasn't as clueless as Cameron (NHS stuff worked okay, started Mayor of London business). Basically, Blair has good stuff to point to, Cameron hasn't.
only because he had no time to do anything.
He also had no political approval as he was never elected.
He also is a cunthead fucknut for being Chancellor for a decade leading up to the biggest international banking crisis ever and not spotting it / taking responsibility for it.
He was sold the 3G contracts and made billions and I can't work out for the life of me where all that money went.
He was also a massive advocate of "light touch" financial regulation.
All in all, the guy's a twat.
He wasn't head of the party when there was an electino and his party got a majority / got a minority but lead a coalition.
They were a bleak few months.
Doing this was like grading different venereal diseases I'd like to have in order of preference.