Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
Really inspired me to go out and watch it, that has.
(Has anyone seen the first one? What's it actually like?)
Awful actresses. Car breaks down. Nearest house is the doctor's. Drugs their drinks. Meh. Lots of inconsistencies which I won't detail just in case anyone hasn't seen it, wants to and then reads this. The second one just sounds ridiculous. Over 2 minutes of cuts. Been a long time since something has been cut that much.
about 201m longer than needed, amiriteguys
It's a classic
I only posted once in it though, so I guess it barely registered in my egocentric world.
wasn't amazing but focused on the horror of the idea more than being super graphic or anything. also it was quite short, which helped.
that does not appear to be the case with this one.
it has a reputation as being some kind of pinnacle of gross-out horror, but it's nothing compared to some.
pt. 2 should be good if they continue to exploit and expand upon the utterly ridiculous concept, rather than include loads of gratuitous violence. the cuts do indicate the latter...we'll see.
I won't be watching these films until the mad scientist has exactly 25 victims.
centipedes can have a varying number of legs from under 20 to over 300. Also, common species of millipede have between 36 and 400 legs, although the rare species Illacme plenipes has up to 750.
Do not want.
pretty wimpy in terms of disgusting gore, etc, and the effects were generally badly done
ended with a chase between the human centipede and the evil doctor with a broken leg. not at all thrilling
to watch the first one, this, and a serbian film, in a back to back marathon