Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
Why would you think this was a suitable punishment????
AND HE'S COMPLAINING ???????
- FRANK, SLOUGH, 13/7/2011 11:30
Click to rate Rating 144
it says that...
in the article...
you presumably mean this was a scene in pulp fiction which the link even alludes to with a picture
...I'd rob it.
cos of how all men everywhere think with their dicks and just uncontrollably want to have sex with all the women all the time without discrimination because of hormones and evolution and stuff. SCIENCE
still rape tho innit luv
all men, everywhere, all the time? you've got a much lower opinion of men than any raging feminist i've met, tbh
men are dogs, so what? but if it helps you sleep at night, none of the males you care about have primal instincts. Only everyone else. Sleep well.
there's a good reason men don't want to fuck grannies.
if not then rape of men by women (who aren't grannies) is literally not possible, on your terms
if by that you mean 'sexual urges'. so do the women. what's your point, spaceman?
Say you didn't want to have sex and a lady touched your penis, would you not get aroused by that?
That describes about 50% of my sexual experiences in day to day life to be fair.
Before it's even gone to trial?
sometimes i give myself a semi by just fiddling around down there, not doing anything sexual
i think even brian blessed could get me hard, but i wouldn't enjoy it
if i was Wza i would bother finding the links.
can someone confirm that i'm not imagining this
thx. so is the daily mail literally just rehashing a several-year-old story because they missed it the first time around and hoping nobody will notice?
Published: 14 April, 2009, 14:05
Edited: 29 September, 2010, 04:05
*even though i've officially handed the crown on to songs_about_ducking
Paying someone 1000 roubles, cash in hand, which is not declared is tax evasion, pure and simple.
i.e. would you be a robber if you were then forced to be a sex slave?
I can only assume that's a deliberate decision? Too emasculating perhaps?
it is a male only crime.
or actually true
And minors. Not sure about men
*should add that strictly speaking, I think you're right. Rape requires insertion of a penis.
I was being entirely serious, I'll try and find a legal thing that isn;t totally unreadable.
(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
Whether you agree with this definition is up for debate.
There is surely something inherently more violating about rape as defined there than there is about - say - giving a man a load of viagra and then bringing him to orgasm, and in the case of vaginal and anal penetration, far more capacity for physical damage to the victim as well. Even if you shoved a dildo into someone, is that really the same? So for all the talk of sexual inequality and "Yeah, but what if a man had done it to a woman?", I'm not sure the somewhat glib response to the story is entirely unjustified.
however psychologically I would assume it would be just as detrimental. Being forced to do something sexual against your will - whether you 'physically' enjoy it or not doesn't make it right and doesn't mean you will not emotionally suffer.
Coincidentally, during the early 1900 if a woman conceived a child after a rape it was deemed not rape because they believed that in order for a woman to conceive she must orgasm which means that if she were raped and conceived as a result she must have orgasmed therefore enjoyed it therefore was not rape.
I'm not saying because being raped in the legal sense is more likely to be physically damaging, it's in turn more likely to be emotionally damaging, although I'm sure there is some interplay there. That was meant largely as an aside. My primary point (however badly made) was, what the woman did in this instance was something external on the man's body. That is different to forcing something inside of someone, whether it causes them physical damage or not. That was what I meant when I said it's "inherently more violating". You could perhaps say there's something more personal about it. The penis is relatively exposed; in some sense, it is there for the whole world. But the vagina, the mouth, the anus - they are all very much the property of the person they belong to. They are inside the person. To get to them, you have to push past some natural barrier. That, I imagine, would have greater emotional impact.
vaginal or anal rape will invariably consist of multiple movements, each comprising a violation in itself; stimulating a man's penis can to a greater extent be considered one extended act.
She said they had sex, but say she'd just given him a blow job - in that case, she'd have got no objective pleasure from it (unless she was masturbating at the same time). The connotations of the act are therefore different; the control element is still there, but there is not the same exploitation element. The victim will not come out of the ordeal thinking "My body has been used to give someone else sexual pleasure", which surely plays a part in the psychological/emotional impact of a rape.
suggesting that I know what rape victims go through in the aftermath of such an ordeal. I am aware that I am not really in a position to speak on their behalf and this is mainly speculation.
it's the psychological impact. and that's why people react with the "waheyy, i should burgle hairdressers!!" because it's assumed that men always want sex, whatever the circumstance, but women don't.
i think it's entirely reasonable to assume that a man could feel emotionally violated in the same way a woman would. i agree that the chances of it not affecting a man in the same way are exponentially higher, but not so high that the subject should be a complete joke (which it more or less is)
Guess they're talking about statutory rape then...
I guess she must have been convicted because she facilitated the rape?
I NEED TO KNOW DAMMIT!!!
Take some poppers.
you break into a shop, your adrenaline is pumping and the only thing on your mind is getting the fuck out of there ASAP. then somebody roundhouses you, ties you up and starts force feeding you pills.
i'm pretty sure that, at that moment, even if my erection was a solid rock, i'd be more interested in shitting my pants than blowing my load.
no reason i can't do both
is it ok to rape a nympho? she wants sex all the time anyway, you're just giving it to her. right?
as we've discussed it's the psychological damage that is the real concern. and i imagine getting beaten, tied up, fed medication and raped is just as harrowing an experience for a man as for a woman. i'm pretty sure that being completely emasculated like that would fuck you up.