Why is the selling point of these below average chocolates the fact that one of them is found by most people to be disgusting?
Except it's not even one, is it? That orange one is shit as well.
Apparently they used to have peanut, but swapped it for raisin? Then they tried replacing shit coffee with even worse strawberry
WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY PLAYING AT OVER THERE AT REVELS HQ??
Hang on....wikipedia ' In July 2008 Revels started a "Big Brother"-style eviction campaign where one flavour from the bag would be replaced by a special limited edition flavour. Consumers were asked to nominate..........The flavour attracting the most votes was coffee, which received nearly half the votes cast.'
WE BROUGHT THIS UPON OURSELVES
Flavours should obviously be raisin, peanut, toffee, pure choc, malteser
*pure choc is a must because you would be all like 'who's in here Mr Revel???' and then it would just be pure choc and you'd be like 'oh, no one' and you just wouldn't know what to believe anymore