Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
I dunno what to believe now.
for the number of sanctions per week.
Oh, wait.... http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/apr/08/jobcentres-benefits-sanctions-targets
it's funnier this way.
A Bull is an agressive lesbian.
which 1/3 true in his case
this is not how I envisaged this thread panning out.
cause those are really, really odd reasons not to trust CG and just makes you sound like a fattist, homophobic snob. Even if you were joking.
But well done on turning this thread into a rather nasty discussion on someone who isn't here.
I think that we should close this sub-thread and get back to the OP's topic.
You fat lesbian.
now you say you don't trust him cause he's a troll with a politcal agenda. Not cause of the way he looks or who he fancies or which university he went to. You made it personal for some reason. Not defending him or anything. It just struck me as a pretty odd thing to say.
Circles. Beautiful circles.
Although, having said that, I guess losing a stone or so wouldn't do any harm. And there was that cellist I mentioned earlier. As you were...
Actually, I'm not even twenty any more. You've really messed up this time.
desperation to keep this out of the courts. They are wriggling like a worm cut in half by a spade.
is too intense.
In that they've already paid out lots of money to prevent people bringing civil cases against them.
I don't think that this will stop the criminal investigation at all, though I might be wrong.
There was an interesting article in the paper today about how the mobile phone companies are now accusing John Yates of lying about their investigation: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/apr/07/phone-hacking-john-yates-evidence
But this is a bit more of a change in their stance.
Serves them right, maybe the poor bastards will just have to actually do some journalism.
would have have included a clause denying admission of guilt, whereas these ones won't.
The guy trying to convince people that it's about freedom of speech, not selling papers.
slouching, tie loosened, baggy brown suit - he looked like a stereotypical 'sleazy journalist'. And he had basically no morals.
Was fun though.
he seemed to be trying to convince himself in what he was saying as much as anyone else. Unfair putting him against Prescott really.
As marckee says above, the amount of money they've paid out of court is as close to an admission of guilt as you're going to get.
What's really annoying is that I will still see tonnes of people walking up the road on Sunday with a copy of the NOTW under the arm.
getting confused between freedom of speech and illegal phone hacking
something to do with Catholicism and the Pope or something. Big darts.
but frankly I can't be arsed. To summarise my thoughts: I hope they go fucking bust and that the top management are thrown in jail for their actions/mismanagement. Both of these things are unlikely and/or impossible.
Especially when I've told you before about it, and asked you not to.
Apart from anything else, it's needlessly overfamiliar.
No need for it. No need at all. Stop it please. Thank you.
TheBeautifulReturn had replied to one of my posts upthread with my IRL name.
And that post was a reply to it.
But it seems as if someone has deleted said TBR post (cheers, whoever it was), so my reply has ended up just tagged onto the end of the thread.